• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据时间限制调整速度-准确性权衡时的风险规避。

Risk aversion in the adjustment of speed-accuracy tradeoff depending on time constraints.

机构信息

Laboratory of Sports Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48052-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-48052-0
PMID:31409813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6692412/
Abstract

Humans are often required to make decisions under time constraints and to adjust speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) based on time constraints. Previous studies have investigated how humans adjust SAT depending on the time discount rate of expected gain. Although the expected gain of actions can be determined by both gain and probability, only situations where gain decreases over time have been tested. Considering the effect of risk on decision-making, the difference in time discount factors may modulate the response strategies for SAT, since temporal changes in variance of possible outcomes differ when gain or probability decreases over time. Here, we investigated the response strategies for SAT under different time discount factors. Participants were required to select one of the two options with different initial values in situations where the expected gain of options declined over time by a linear decrease in gain or probability. Comparison of response strategies between conditions revealed that response times in the gain condition were longer than those in the probability condition, possibly due to risk-aversion. These findings indicate the existence of common rules underpinning sensorimotor and economic decision-making.

摘要

人类经常需要在时间限制下做出决策,并根据时间限制调整速度准确性权衡(SAT)。以前的研究已经调查了人类如何根据预期收益的时间折扣率来调整 SAT。尽管行动的预期收益可以由收益和概率共同决定,但只测试了收益随时间减少的情况。考虑到风险对决策的影响,时间折扣因素的差异可能会调节 SAT 的反应策略,因为当收益或概率随时间减少时,可能结果方差的时间变化不同。在这里,我们研究了在不同时间折扣因素下 SAT 的反应策略。在选项的预期收益随时间线性减少的情况下,参与者需要从两个具有不同初始值的选项中选择一个。条件之间的反应策略比较表明,收益条件下的反应时间比概率条件下的反应时间长,这可能是由于风险规避。这些发现表明,在感觉运动和经济决策中有共同的规则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/b555a0c82b54/41598_2019_48052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/48a727a414a5/41598_2019_48052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/edf8307ac273/41598_2019_48052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/5cc23da234b5/41598_2019_48052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/b555a0c82b54/41598_2019_48052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/48a727a414a5/41598_2019_48052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/edf8307ac273/41598_2019_48052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/5cc23da234b5/41598_2019_48052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6235/6692412/b555a0c82b54/41598_2019_48052_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk aversion in the adjustment of speed-accuracy tradeoff depending on time constraints.根据时间限制调整速度-准确性权衡时的风险规避。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48052-0.
2
Trading accuracy for speed over the course of a decision.在决策过程中,为了追求速度而牺牲准确性。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Aug 1;126(2):361-372. doi: 10.1152/jn.00038.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Neurally constrained modeling of speed-accuracy tradeoff during visual search: gated accumulation of modulated evidence.视觉搜索中速度-准确性权衡的神经约束建模:调制证据的门控积累。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Apr 1;121(4):1300-1314. doi: 10.1152/jn.00507.2018. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Trial-to-trial adjustments of speed-accuracy trade-offs in premotor and primary motor cortex.运动前区和初级运动皮层中速度-准确性权衡的逐次试验调整。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Feb 1;117(2):665-683. doi: 10.1152/jn.00726.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
5
Neurodynamic Evidence Supports a Forced-Excursion Model of Decision-Making under Speed/Accuracy Instructions.神经动力学证据支持速度/准确性指令下决策的强制激发模型。
eNeuro. 2018 Jun 26;5(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0159-18.2018. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
6
Computational analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff.计算速度-准确性权衡分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):21995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26120-2.
7
Qualitative speed-accuracy tradeoff effects that cannot be explained by the diffusion model under the selective influence assumption.在选择性影响假设下,无法用扩散模型解释的定性速度-准确性权衡效应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79765-2.
8
The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff.在速度-准确性权衡中进行感觉处理的最优性。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 6;32(23):7992-8003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-12.2012.
9
fMRI evidence for a dual process account of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in decision-making.功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)证据支持决策中速度-准确性权衡的双过程理论。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 9;3(7):e2635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002635.
10
Neural mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff of visual search: saccade vigor, the origin of targeting errors, and comparison of the superior colliculus and frontal eye field.视觉搜索速度-准确性权衡的神经机制:扫视力度、目标错误的根源以及上丘与额叶眼区的比较。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul 1;120(1):372-384. doi: 10.1152/jn.00887.2017. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Speed is associated with polarization during subjective evaluation: no tradeoff, but an effect of the ease of processing.在主观评价过程中,速度与两极分化相关:不存在权衡取舍,而是处理难易程度的一种效应。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3691-3714. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10151-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Developmental Trajectory of Anticipation: Insights from Sequential Comparative Judgments.预期的发展轨迹:来自序列比较判断的见解
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;13(8):646. doi: 10.3390/bs13080646.
3
Effects of Time Constraints and Goal Setting on Basketball Shooting.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic combination of sensory and reward information under time pressure.在时间压力下对感觉和奖励信息进行动态组合。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Mar 27;14(3):e1006070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006070. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Cognitive Bias for the Distribution of Ball Landing Positions in Amateur Tennis Players (Cognitive Bias for the Motor Variance in Tennis).业余网球运动员击球落点分布的认知偏差(网球运动方差的认知偏差)
J Mot Behav. 2019;51(2):141-150. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2018.1440523. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Sub-optimality in motor planning is retained throughout 9 days practice of 2250 trials.
时间限制和目标设定对篮球投篮的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:923061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923061. eCollection 2022.
4
Motor Plans under Uncertainty Reflect a Trade-Off between Maximizing Reward and Success.在不确定性下的运动计划反映了在最大化奖励和成功之间的权衡。
eNeuro. 2022 Apr 12;9(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0503-21.2022. Print 2022 Mar-Apr.
5
Modulation of initial movement for double potential targets with specific time constraints.带有特定时间约束的双靶标初始运动的调制。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 18;11(1):22492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01777-3.
6
Sensorimotor strategy selection under time constraints in the presence of two motor targets with different values.在存在两个具有不同价值的运动目标的情况下,在时间限制下选择运动感觉策略。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 15;11(1):22207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01584-w.
7
Peer Presence Effect on Numerosity and Phonological Comparisons in 4th Graders: When Working with a SchoolMate Makes Children More Adult-like.同伴在场对四年级学生数字和语音比较的影响:与同学一起学习时,孩子的表现更像成年人。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 12;10(9):902. doi: 10.3390/biology10090902.
8
Competition Rather Than Observation and Cooperation Facilitates Optimal Motor Planning.竞争而非观察与合作有助于实现最佳运动规划。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 26;3:637225. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.637225. eCollection 2021.
9
The impact of learning opportunities on the development of learning and decision-making: an experiment with passerine birds.学习机会对学习和决策发展的影响:以雀形目鸟类为例的实验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 20;375(1803):20190496. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0496. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
在 2250 次试验的 9 天练习过程中,运动规划中的次优性得以保留。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 21;6:37181. doi: 10.1038/srep37181.
4
Rationality in Human Movement.人类运动中的合理性
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2016 Jan;44(1):20-8. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000066.
5
Motor planning under temporal uncertainty is suboptimal when the gain function is asymmetric.当增益函数不对称时,在时间不确定性下的运动规划是次优的。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;9:88. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00088. eCollection 2015.
6
Seeing what you want to see: priors for one's own actions represent exaggerated expectations of success.看到你想看到的:对自身行为的先验认知代表了对成功的过高期望。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun 27;8:232. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00232. eCollection 2014.
7
The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior.速度-准确性权衡:历史、生理学、方法论和行为。
Front Neurosci. 2014 Jun 11;8:150. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00150. eCollection 2014.
8
Testing whether humans have an accurate model of their own motor uncertainty in a speeded reaching task.测试人类在快速到达任务中是否对自身运动不确定性有准确的模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5):e1003080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003080. Epub 2013 May 23.
9
Reinforcement learning in professional basketball players.职业篮球运动员的强化学习。
Nat Commun. 2011 Dec 6;2:569. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1580.
10
Speed/accuracy trade-off between the habitual and the goal-directed processes.习惯与目标导向过程之间的速度/准确性权衡。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 May;7(5):e1002055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002055. Epub 2011 May 26.