• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定商业猪群中未来世代基因组估计育种值准确性的稳定性。

Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Smithfield Premium Genetics, Rose Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2021 Apr 1;99(4). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab085.

DOI:10.1093/jas/skab085
PMID:33733277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8051850/
Abstract

Genomic information has a limited dimensionality (number of independent chromosome segments [Me]) related to the effective population size. Under the additive model, the persistence of genomic accuracies over generations should be high when the nongenomic information (pedigree and phenotypes) is equivalent to Me animals with high accuracy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the decay in accuracy over time and to compare the magnitude of decay with varying quantities of data and with traits of low and moderate heritability. The dataset included 161,897 phenotypic records for a growth trait (GT) and 27,669 phenotypic records for a fitness trait (FT) related to prolificacy in a population with dimensionality around 5,000. The pedigree included 404,979 animals from 2008 to 2020, of which 55,118 were genotyped. Two single-trait models were used with all ancestral data and sliding subsets of 3-, 2-, and 1-generation intervals. Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) was used to compute genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). Estimated accuracies were calculated by the linear regression (LR) method. The validation population consisted of single generations succeeding the training population and continued forward for all generations available. The average accuracy for the first generation after training with all ancestral data was 0.69 and 0.46 for GT and FT, respectively. The average decay in accuracy from the first generation after training to generation 9 was -0.13 and -0.19 for GT and FT, respectively. The persistence of accuracy improves with more data. Old data have a limited impact on the predictions for young animals for a trait with a large amount of information but a bigger impact for a trait with less information.

摘要

基因组信息的维度有限(与有效种群大小相关的独立染色体片段数量 [Me])。在加性模型下,当非基因组信息(系谱和表型)与具有高精度的 Me 动物等同时,基因组准确性在世代间的持续时间应该很高。本研究的目的是评估随着时间的推移准确性的衰减,并比较衰减的幅度与不同数量的数据以及低和中度遗传力的性状。数据集包括一个群体中与繁殖力相关的生长性状(GT)的 161,897 个表型记录和一个适应性状(FT)的 27,669 个表型记录,该群体的维度约为 5000。系谱包括 2008 年至 2020 年的 404,979 只动物,其中 55,118 只进行了基因分型。使用所有祖先数据和 3、2 和 1 个世代间隔的滑动子集,使用两个单性状模型。单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测(ssGBLUP)用于计算基因组估计育种值(GEBV)。估计准确性通过线性回归(LR)方法计算。验证群体由继训练群体之后的单个世代组成,并继续进行所有可用的世代。使用所有祖先数据进行训练后的第一代的平均准确性分别为 0.69 和 0.46,分别用于 GT 和 FT。从训练后的第一代到第 9 代的平均准确性衰减分别为 -0.13 和 -0.19,分别用于 GT 和 FT。准确性的持久性随着数据的增加而提高。对于信息量较大的性状,旧数据对年轻动物的预测影响有限,但对于信息量较小的性状,旧数据的影响更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/3d58519b4f6d/skab085_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/11bc521705e3/skab085_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/30deaa912d29/skab085_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/581ed5e52382/skab085_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/654b19bff41a/skab085_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/3d58519b4f6d/skab085_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/11bc521705e3/skab085_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/30deaa912d29/skab085_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/581ed5e52382/skab085_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/654b19bff41a/skab085_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a17/8051850/3d58519b4f6d/skab085_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.确定商业猪群中未来世代基因组估计育种值准确性的稳定性。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Apr 1;99(4). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab085.
2
Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.训练世代数对蛋鸡群体中各种性状基因组预测的影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Mar 19;48:22. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0198-9.
3
Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.中等规模繁殖群体中仔猪出生存活数基因组预测不同方法的实证比较。
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1434-1443. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0991.
4
Investigating the persistence of accuracy of genomic predictions over time in broilers.研究肉鸡基因组预测准确性随时间的持续性。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 1;99(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab239.
5
Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.世代间鸡基因组估计育种值准确性的持续
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jun 21;43(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-23.
6
Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.基因型策略对纯种种猪模拟群体中基因组预测准确性的影响。
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):1804-1810. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003567. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.使用不同伪表型对内洛尔牛牛肉脂肪酸谱的基因组预测能力。
J Appl Genet. 2018 Nov;59(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0470-5. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.猪基因组评估中基因型、表型和系谱截断的界限。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad273.
9
Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?对年轻的基因分型动物的评估是否受益于过去几代?
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3930-42. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Comparing algorithms to approximate accuracies for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.比较算法以近似单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测器的准确性。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae195.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.在大型基因组模型中利用预测性按时间切片估计遗传力和遗传相关性。
Genetics. 2025 Jun 4;230(2). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyaf066.
2
Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.在基因组选择计划中使用孟德尔抽样方差进行选择决策时的实际考量。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):419-437. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12913. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Potential negative effects of genomic selection.

本文引用的文献

1
Using imputed whole-genome sequence variants to uncover candidate mutations and genes affecting milking speed and temperament in Holstein cattle.利用推算的全基因组序列变异来揭示影响荷斯坦奶牛挤奶速度和性情的候选突变和基因。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Nov;103(11):10383-10398. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18897. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.使用包含元数据和未知父群的 BLUP 和 SSGBLUP 对奶绵羊进行评估的偏差和准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Aug 12;52(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00567-1.
3
Accuracy of genomic BLUP when considering a genomic relationship matrix based on the number of the largest eigenvalues: a simulation study.
基因组选择的潜在负面影响。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae155.
4
Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.猪基因组评估中基因型、表型和系谱截断的界限。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad273.
5
The importance of historically popular sires on the accuracy of genomic predictions of young animals in the US Holstein population.美国荷斯坦奶牛群体中,历史上受欢迎的种公牛对年轻动物基因组预测准确性的重要性。
JDS Commun. 2023 Apr 20;4(4):260-264. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0299. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.校正挪威红牛单步基因组预测中基础群体差异和未知父群。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac227.
7
Quality of breeding value predictions from longitudinal analyses, with application to residual feed intake in pigs.从纵向分析中预测育种值的质量,应用于猪的剩余采食量。
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 May 13;54(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00722-w.
8
Determining Heat Stress Effects of Multiple Genetic Traits in Tropical Dairy Cattle Using Single-Step Genomic BLUP.利用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法确定热带奶牛多个遗传性状的热应激效应
Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 3;9(2):66. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020066.
考虑基于最大特征值数量的基因组关系矩阵时,基因组 BLUP 的准确性:一项模拟研究。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Dec 12;51(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0516-0.
4
Behavior of the Linear Regression method to estimate bias and accuracies with correct and incorrect genetic evaluation models.线性回归方法对正确和不正确遗传评估模型估计偏差和精度的行为。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):529-544. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16603. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.使用逻辑回归(LR)方法对半参数估计群体预测准确性和偏差的估计。
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Nov 6;50(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0426-6.
6
Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection.基因组选择中的非加性效应。
Front Genet. 2018 Mar 6;9:78. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00078. eCollection 2018.
7
Selection of core animals in the Algorithm for Proven and Young using a simulation model.使用模拟模型在“经证实和年轻动物算法”中选择核心动物。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Dec;134(6):545-552. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12276. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits Cannot Be Inferred from Variance Component Analysis.数量性状的遗传结构无法从方差成分分析中推断出来。
PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 3;12(11):e1006421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006421. eCollection 2016 Nov.
9
Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.基因组信息的维度以及不同家畜物种的“已证实和年轻个体算法”的性能。
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Oct 31;48(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0261-6.
10
Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.基因组选择对美国荷斯坦奶牛遗传选择差异和世代间隔的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):E3995-4004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519061113. Epub 2016 Jun 27.