• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃酸苷与维奈托克联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病的疗效比较。

Comparative effectiveness of glasdegib versus venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia.

机构信息

Purple Squirrel Economics, Montreal H3J 1M1, Canada.

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2021 May;10(7):603-612. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0280. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2020-0280
PMID:33733815
Abstract

Two combination therapies recently approved and recommended for use in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in acute myeloid leukemia patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy are glasdegib+LDAC and venetoclax+LDAC. An indirect treatment comparison used median overall survival, overall survival hazard ratios, complete remission (CR), CR+CR with incomplete blood count recovery and transfusion independence to assess comparative effectiveness, and a simulated treatment comparison accounted for differences in patient characteristics between trials. Differences in efficacy between glasdegib+LDAC and venetoclax+LDAC were suggestive and not statistically significant. With no significant differences in comparative effectiveness, considerations such as safety profiles, burden of administration and patient preference are likely to guide treatment decisions.

摘要

两种联合疗法最近被批准并推荐与低剂量阿糖胞苷(LDAC)联合用于不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病患者,分别是glasdegib+LDAC 和 venetoclax+LDAC。间接治疗比较使用中位总生存期、总生存风险比、完全缓解(CR)、CR+不完全血细胞计数恢复的 CR 和输血独立性来评估疗效,模拟治疗比较考虑了试验之间患者特征的差异。glasdegib+LDAC 和 venetoclax+LDAC 之间的疗效差异具有提示性,但没有统计学意义。在没有显著疗效差异的情况下,安全性特征、管理负担和患者偏好等因素可能会指导治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of glasdegib versus venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia.玻璃酸苷与维奈托克联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病的疗效比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 May;10(7):603-612. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0280. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy.根据治疗反应,接受吉拉替尼联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗的急性髓系白血病患者的生存结果和临床获益。
J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.
3
A quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicities analysis of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine versus low-dose cytarabine as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy.对于不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病患者,用加用低剂量阿糖胞苷的吉拉替尼与低剂量阿糖胞苷作为初始治疗的无病症或毒性的调整后生存时间的质量分析。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;126(19):4315-4321. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33072. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial.地西他滨联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗初治和复发性急性髓系白血病的临床获益:一项 II 期随机试验的长期分析。
Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1181-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.维奈托克联合 LDAC 方案用于不适合强化化疗的新诊断 AML:一项 3 期随机安慰剂对照试验。
Blood. 2020 Jun 11;135(24):2137-2145. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020004856.
6
The cost-effectiveness of glasdegib in combination with low-dose cytarabine, for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in adult patients who are not eligible to receive intensive induction chemotherapy in Canada.在加拿大,对于不符合强化诱导化疗条件的新诊断成人急性髓系白血病患者,用吉西他滨联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):150-161. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1875743.
7
Costs per patient achieving remission with venetoclax-based combinations in newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy.新诊断为不符合强化诱导化疗条件的急性髓系白血病患者中,基于 venetoclax 的联合治疗使每位患者达到缓解的成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):980-988. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22021. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
8
An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure.新诊断急性髓系白血病患者的总生存评估及其与格拉斯吉布治疗和暴露的关系。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
9
[Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine for patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: results from the Chinese cohort of a phase three randomized placebo-controlled trial].维奈托克联合小剂量阿糖胞苷治疗不适合强化化疗的初治急性髓系白血病患者:一项三期随机安慰剂对照试验中国队列的结果
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 14;42(4):288-294. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.04.004.
10
Venetoclax Combined With Low-Dose Cytarabine for Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From a Phase Ib/II Study. Venetoclax 联合低剂量阿糖胞苷治疗未经治疗的急性髓系白血病患者:来自 Ib/II 期研究的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1277-1284. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01600. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare resource utilization trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy receiving first-line systemic treatment or best supportive care: A multicenter international study.不适合强化化疗的急性髓细胞白血病患者一线系统治疗或最佳支持治疗的医疗资源利用趋势:一项多中心国际研究。
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Jul;109(1):58-68. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13769. Epub 2022 Apr 13.