• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查参与度:城乡比较。

Low-dose CT lung cancer screening uptake: A rural-urban comparison.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):40-53. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12568. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12568
PMID:33734492
Abstract

PURPOSE

The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends lung cancer screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) in high-risk individuals. Our objective was to identify demographic, health, and financial factors associated with screening uptake, with a focus on urban-rural differences.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2018 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and its optional Lung Cancer Screening Module to examine factors associated with screening uptake among 20 states that administered the optional module. We compared differences in factors associated with uptake overall and by geographical regions and conducted multivariable logistic mixed-effects regression, accounting for participant clustering by state to assess the impact of these factors on uptake.

FINDINGS

Overall 1,268 participants underwent LDCT screening with no significant differences observed between rural (16.3%) and urban residents (17.7%, p = 0.67). In multivariable models, rural residents did not differ significantly in their LDCT screening uptake (OR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.67-1.09, p = 0.20), but uptake was significantly higher for participants with underlying chronic respiratory conditions, veterans, those with higher pack-year history, and those with poor/fair general health and prior history of cancer. Uptake declined with age, higher education level, concerns about paying for medical care, and lack of primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifiable targets can be leveraged to increase LDCT screening. Based on significant predictors of screening uptake, clinicians should prioritize interventions that effectively consider smoking history as well as those identified as effective in veterans' health settings. Additionally, reducing structural barriers to care related to insurance and income will be key to reducing disparities.

摘要

目的

美国预防服务工作组建议对高危人群进行低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查。我们的目的是确定与筛查参与相关的人口统计学、健康和财务因素,重点关注城乡差异。

方法

我们分析了 2018 年和 2019 年行为风险因素监测系统及其可选的肺癌筛查模块的数据,以检查在实施可选模块的 20 个州中与筛查参与相关的因素。我们比较了总体以及按地理区域划分的与参与相关的因素差异,并进行了多变量逻辑混合效应回归,考虑了按州划分的参与者聚类,以评估这些因素对参与的影响。

结果

总体而言,有 1268 名参与者接受了 LDCT 筛查,农村居民(16.3%)和城市居民(17.7%)之间没有显著差异(p=0.67)。在多变量模型中,农村居民的 LDCT 筛查参与率没有显著差异(OR=0.85;95%CI:0.67-1.09,p=0.20),但有潜在慢性呼吸系统疾病、退伍军人、吸烟史较高、一般健康状况较差/一般以及有癌症病史的参与者的筛查参与率显著较高。随着年龄的增长、教育水平的提高、对支付医疗费用的担忧以及缺乏初级保健,参与率会下降。

结论

可以利用可修改的目标来增加 LDCT 筛查。根据筛查参与的显著预测因素,临床医生应优先考虑那些有效考虑吸烟史的干预措施,以及那些在退伍军人健康环境中被证明有效的干预措施。此外,减少与保险和收入相关的护理结构障碍将是缩小差距的关键。

相似文献

1
Low-dose CT lung cancer screening uptake: A rural-urban comparison.低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查参与度:城乡比较。
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):40-53. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12568. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Predictors of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization in a Population-Based Survey.一项基于人群调查的肺癌筛查利用率预测因素
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Dec;17(12):1591-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Challenges and Opportunities for Lung Cancer Screening in Rural America.美国农村地区肺癌筛查的挑战与机遇。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt B):590-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.001.
4
Urban-Rural Disparities in Access to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening in Missouri and Illinois.密苏里州和伊利诺伊州低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查机会的城乡差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 5;17:E140. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200202.
5
Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States.美国城乡环境中符合条件的成年人获得肺癌筛查的地理可达性。
Cancer. 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1584-1594. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33996. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Impact of Low-dose Chest CT Screening on the Association Between Rurality and Lung Cancer Outcomes.低剂量胸部 CT 筛查对农村和肺癌结局之间关联的影响。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;45(12):519-525. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000956. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.农村肺癌筛查的实施和采用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Mar;19(3):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
New recommendation and coverage of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: uptake has increased but is still low.肺癌筛查低剂量计算机断层扫描的新推荐与覆盖情况:接受度有所提高但仍较低。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3338-9.
9
Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.新墨西哥州初级保健提供者对使用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的态度和信念
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 9;12:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150112.
10
[Analysis of low-dose computed tomography compliance and related factors among high-risk population of lung cancer in three provinces participating in the cancer screening program in urban China].[中国城市癌症筛查项目中三省肺癌高危人群低剂量计算机断层扫描依从性及相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 May 6;55(5):633-639. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20201015-01286.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers of lung cancer screening participation: umbrella and systematic review of the global evidence.肺癌筛查参与的促进因素和障碍:全球证据的综合及系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):2993. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23808-8.
2
Collaborative Selection of Implementation Strategies for Improving Smoking Cessation Treatment and Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Pilot Study.联邦合格健康中心改善戒烟治疗和肺癌筛查实施策略的协作选择:一项试点研究。
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jul 8:333549251322734. doi: 10.1177/00333549251322734.
3
New Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence.
肺癌筛查与人工智能的新视角
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;15(3):498. doi: 10.3390/life15030498.
4
An approach for developing a blood-based screening panel for lung cancer based on clonal hematopoietic mutations.基于克隆性造血突变的肺癌血液筛查面板的开发方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0307232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307232. eCollection 2024.
5
Regional trends in diagnosis of advanced lung cancer in Michigan over 33 years.密歇根州33年间晚期肺癌诊断的区域趋势。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 May 31;16(5):2936-2947. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-205. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Healthcare disparities, screening, and molecular testing in the changing landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: a review.美国非小细胞肺癌变化格局中的医疗保健差异、筛查和分子检测:综述。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024 Dec;43(4):1217-1231. doi: 10.1007/s10555-024-10187-6. Epub 2024 May 16.
7
Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.风险定制癌症筛查在人群中的实施考虑因素:范围综述。
Prev Med. 2024 Apr;181:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
8
Lung cancer screening use among screening-eligible adults with disabilities.残疾筛查合格的成年人中肺癌筛查的使用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Apr;72(4):1155-1165. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18795. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Lung Cancer Screening Among U.S. Military Veterans by Health Status and Race and Ethnicity, 2017-2020: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study.2017 - 2020年美国退伍军人按健康状况、种族和族裔划分的肺癌筛查:一项基于人群的横断面研究
AJPM Focus. 2023 Feb 9;2(2):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100084. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Equitable implementation of lung cancer screening: avoiding its potential to mirror existing inequities among people who use tobacco.公平实施肺癌筛查:避免其在使用烟草的人群中潜在地反映现有的不平等现象。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01790-z. Epub 2023 Sep 15.