• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家新区对中国经济发展和空气污染的影响:来自 69 个大中城市的经验证据。

Effects of National New District on economic development and air pollution in China: empirical evidence from 69 large and medium-sized cities.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):38594-38603. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13494-5. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-13494-5
PMID:33738735
Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the effect of the establishment of National New District (NND) on economic development and air pollution in China. For this purpose, this study adopts the difference-in-differences (DID) model, the propensity-score-matched difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) model, and the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model, using a panel data set of 69 large and medium-sized cities during the period of 2003-2018. The results show that NND promotes economic development but fails to reduce the emission of air pollution including per capita SO and per capita smoke without the consideration of spatial spillover effect. However, the promotion effect of NND on economic development is not supported after PSM matching. On the other hand, the advantage of the SDID model in policy evaluation is proved. For instance, with the consideration of spatial spillover effect, the win-win of promoting economic development and reducing air pollution are partially supported. Based on the above empirical findings, several policy implementations and research prospects are outlined.

摘要

本研究试图探讨国家新区(NND)的设立对中国经济发展和空气污染的影响。为此,本研究采用了差分法(DID)模型、倾向得分匹配差分法(PSM-DID)和空间差分法(SDID)模型,利用 2003-2018 年期间 69 个大中城市的面板数据。结果表明,NND 促进了经济发展,但在不考虑空间溢出效应的情况下,未能减少包括人均 SO 和人均烟尘在内的空气污染排放。然而,在进行 PSM 匹配后,NND 对经济发展的促进作用并不支持。另一方面,SDID 模型在政策评估方面的优势得到了证明。例如,在考虑空间溢出效应的情况下,部分支持了促进经济发展和减少空气污染的双赢局面。基于以上实证研究结果,提出了几项政策实施和研究展望。

相似文献

1
Effects of National New District on economic development and air pollution in China: empirical evidence from 69 large and medium-sized cities.国家新区对中国经济发展和空气污染的影响:来自 69 个大中城市的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):38594-38603. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13494-5. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Assessment of the Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in China.评估中国大气污染防治行动计划的碳减排效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):13307. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413307.
3
The effects of National High-tech Industrial Development Zones on economic development and environmental pollution in China during 2003-2018.国家高新技术产业开发区对中国 2003-2018 年经济发展和环境污染的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):1097-1107. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10553-1. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
4
Does "National Civilized City" policy mitigate air pollution in China? A spatial Durbin difference-in-differences analysis.“全国文明城市”政策是否减轻了中国的空气污染?基于空间杜宾差分的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 4;24(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18671-y.
5
Ecological Civilization Demonstration Zone, Air Pollution Reduction, and Political Promotion Tournament in China: Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment.生态文明示范区、大气污染减排与中国的政治锦标赛:来自准自然实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11880. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211880.
6
Spatial effects of air pollutants reduction on CO emissions.大气污染物减排对 CO 排放的空间效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(30):75213-75224. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27708-5. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Labor market distortion and air pollution: An empirical analysis based on spatial effect modeling.劳动力市场扭曲与空气污染:基于空间效应模型的实证分析
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 1;337:117743. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117743. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
8
Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations on air pollution: Evidence from urban agglomerations in China.环境规制对空气污染的空间溢出效应:来自中国城市群的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 15;272:110998. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110998. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Do economic development and population agglomeration inevitably aggravate haze pollution in China? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis.经济发展和人口集聚是否必然加剧中国的霾污染?来自空间计量经济学分析的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5063-5079. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10847-4. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
10
Can Green Technological Innovation Reduce Hazardous Air Pollutants?-An Empirical Test Based on 283 Cities in China.绿色技术创新能否减少大气污染物排放?——基于中国 283 个城市的实证检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 30;19(3):1611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031611.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of pilot policy for innovative industrial clusters on green innovation efficiency.创新产业集群试点政策对绿色创新效率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07771-3.
2
Causality and dynamic spillover effects of megacities on regional industrial pollution reduction.特大城市对区域工业污染减排的因果关系及动态溢出效应。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 2;9(3):e14047. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14047. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Does the Establishment of National New Areas Improve Urban Ecological Efficiency? Empirical Evidence Based on Staggered DID Model.
国家新区设立是否提升了城市生态效率?基于双重差分模型的实证检验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20):13623. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013623.
4
Can the Policy of National Urban Agglomeration Improve Economic and Environmental Gains? Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments with 280 Cities in China.城市群政策能否提高经济和环境效益?来自中国 280 个城市的准自然实验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7596. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137596.