Domingo Esteban
Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
J Virol. 2002 Jan 1;76(1):463-465. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.1.463-465.2002.
Holmes and Moya claim that quasispecies is an unnecessary and misleading description of RNA virus evolution, that virologists refer to quasispecies inappropriately, and that there is little evidence of quasispecies in RNA virus evolution. They wish to look for other ideas in evolutionary biology and to set down an agenda for future research. I argue here that real virus quasispecies often differ from the theoretical quasispecies as initially formulated and that this difference does not invalidate quasispecies as a suitable theoretical framework to understand viruses at the population level.
福尔摩斯和莫亚声称,准种是对RNA病毒进化不必要且具误导性的描述,病毒学家不恰当地提及准种,而且在RNA病毒进化中几乎没有准种的证据。他们希望在进化生物学中寻找其他观点,并制定未来研究的议程。我在此论证,真正的病毒准种往往与最初提出的理论准种不同,而这种差异并不会使准种作为理解群体水平病毒的合适理论框架失效。