• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知多样性对于维持共有物的重要性。

The importance of cognitive diversity for sustaining the commons.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

Sustainable Coastal Systems Cluster, National Center of Integrated Coastal Research, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 20;10(1):875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08549-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-08549-8
PMID:30787277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6382855/
Abstract

Cognitive abilities underpin the capacity of individuals to build models of their environment and make decisions about how to govern resources. Here, we test the functional intelligences proposition that functionally diverse cognitive abilities within a group are critical to govern common pool resources. We assess the effect of two cognitive abilities, social and general intelligence, on group performance on a resource harvesting and management game involving either a negative or a positive disturbance to the resource base. Our results indicate that under improving conditions (positive disturbance) groups with higher general intelligence perform better. However, when conditions deteriorate (negative disturbance) groups with high competency in both general and social intelligence are less likely to deplete resources and harvest more. Thus, we propose that a functional diversity of cognitive abilities improves how effectively social groups govern common pool resources, especially when conditions deteriorate and groups need to re-evaluate and change their behaviors.

摘要

认知能力是个体构建环境模型和决定如何管理资源的能力基础。在这里,我们检验了功能多样性认知能力对共同资源管理的重要性这一理论,即群体内部功能多样化的认知能力对管理共同资源至关重要。我们评估了两种认知能力,即社会智能和一般智能,对涉及资源基础负向或正向干扰的资源收获和管理游戏中群体表现的影响。结果表明,在条件改善(正向干扰)的情况下,一般智能较高的群体表现更好。然而,当条件恶化(负向干扰)时,一般智能和社会智能都较高的群体不太可能耗尽资源,反而会收获更多。因此,我们提出,认知能力的功能多样性可以提高社会群体管理共同资源的有效性,尤其是当条件恶化时,群体需要重新评估和改变行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/d5487e1e6815/41467_2019_8549_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/b1f294fdc570/41467_2019_8549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/ed835eb7f5c9/41467_2019_8549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/65b830d18f45/41467_2019_8549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/b8c4c0c998c4/41467_2019_8549_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/d5487e1e6815/41467_2019_8549_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/b1f294fdc570/41467_2019_8549_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/ed835eb7f5c9/41467_2019_8549_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/65b830d18f45/41467_2019_8549_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/b8c4c0c998c4/41467_2019_8549_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41f/6382855/d5487e1e6815/41467_2019_8549_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The importance of cognitive diversity for sustaining the commons.认知多样性对于维持共有物的重要性。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 20;10(1):875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08549-8.
2
Social and general intelligence improves collective action in a common pool resource system.社会和一般智力会提高共同资源系统中的集体行动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7712-7718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915824117. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured".认知能力专题介绍:斯皮尔曼(1904年)发表《“一般智力”,客观确定与测量》100年后。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):96-111. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.96.
4
Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons.公地中规范驱动合作的稳健性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 13;283(1822). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2431.
5
An arms race between producers and scroungers can drive the evolution of social cognition.生产者与寄生者之间的军备竞赛能够推动社会认知的进化。
Behav Ecol. 2014 May;25(3):487-495. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru002. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
6
Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?丰富化对成人认知发展的影响:老年人的功能能力能否得到保持和增强?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
8
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
Are People-Centered Intelligences Psychometrically Distinct from Thing-Centered Intelligences? A Meta-Analysis.以人为主导的智力在心理测量上是否与以物为主导的智力不同?一项元分析。
J Intell. 2021 Sep 30;9(4):48. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9040048.
10
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing the benefits of diversity to address socio-environmental governance challenges.利用多样性的优势来应对社会-环境治理挑战。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0263399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263399. eCollection 2022.
2
Do social identity and cognitive diversity correlate in environmental stakeholders? A novel approach to measuring cognitive distance within and between groups.环境利益相关者的社会认同和认知多样性是否相关?一种测量群体内部和群体之间认知距离的新方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0244907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244907. eCollection 2021.
3
Physician gender as a source of implicit bias affecting clinical decision-making processes: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution.推断人类大脑大小进化的生态和社会驱动因素。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):554-557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0127-x. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Multiplex social ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect community robustness more than resource depletion.多重社会生态网络分析揭示了社会变化对社区稳健性的影响如何超过资源枯竭。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13708-13713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604401113. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review.
医生性别作为影响临床决策过程的隐性偏见的来源:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02601-2.
4
The diversity bonus in pooling local knowledge about complex problems.汇聚关于复杂问题的局部知识的多样性红利。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 2;118(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016887118.
5
Social and general intelligence improves collective action in a common pool resource system.社会和一般智力会提高共同资源系统中的集体行动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7712-7718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915824117. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
儿童期心理理论与亲社会行为:一项元分析综述
Dev Psychol. 2016 Aug;52(8):1192-205. doi: 10.1037/dev0000140. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
The Insensitive Ruins It All: Compositional and Compilational Influences of Social Sensitivity on Collective Intelligence in Groups.麻木不仁毁了一切:社会敏感度对群体中集体智慧的构成性和编纂性影响
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00676. eCollection 2016.
5
Biodiversity enhances reef fish biomass and resistance to climate change.生物多样性可提高珊瑚礁鱼类的生物量及对气候变化的抵御能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 31;113(22):6230-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524465113. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas.时间压力会增强在竞争框架下的社会困境中的合作。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115756. eCollection 2014.
7
Reading the Mind in the Eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of Mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face.从眼神中读懂心思还是从字里行间领会含义?心理理论在网络和面对面交流中对集体智慧的预测效果同样出色。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e115212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115212. eCollection 2014.
8
Cooperating with the future.携手未来。
Nature. 2014 Jul 10;511(7508):220-3. doi: 10.1038/nature13530. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
9
Attributing awareness to oneself and to others.将意识归因于自身和他人。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):5012-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401201111. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
10
Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: a new task for assessing theory of mind in adults.运用虚构内容评估心理状态理解:一项评估成年人心理理论的新任务。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 7;8(11):e81279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081279. eCollection 2013.