Mencía-Ares Oscar, Argüello Héctor, Puente Héctor, Gómez-García Manuel, Manzanilla Edgar G, Álvarez-Ordóñez Avelino, Carvajal Ana, Rubio Pedro
Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Ireland.
Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40813-021-00206-1.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health threat consequence of antimicrobial use (AMU) in human and animal medicine. In food-producing animals factors such as management, husbandry or biosecurity may impact AMU. Organic and extensive Iberian swine productions are based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity to evaluate how sustained differences in AMU impact the AMR in indicator bacteria. Here, we evaluate the usefulness of commensal Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates as AMR bioindicators when comparing 37 Spanish pig farms from both intensive and organic-extensive production systems, considering the effect of AMU and biosecurity measures, the last only on intensive farms.
The production system was the main factor contributing to explain the AMR differences in E. coli and Enterococcus spp. In both bacteria, the pansusceptible phenotype was more common (p < 0.001) on organic-extensive farms when compared to intensive herds. The microbiological resistance in commensal E. coli was, for most of the antimicrobials evaluated, significantly higher (p < 0.05) on intensive farms. In enterococci, the lincosamides usage revealed the association between AMR and AMU, with an increase in the AMR for erythromycin (p < 0.01), quinupristin-dalfopristin (p < 0.01) and the multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype (p < 0.05). The biosecurity measures implemented on intensive farms influenced the AMR of these bioindicators, with a slightly lower resistance to sulfamethoxazole (p < 0.01) and the MDR phenotype (p < 0.05) in E. coli isolated from farms with better cleaning and disinfection protocols. On these intensive farms, we also observed that larger herds had a higher biosecurity when compared to smaller farms (p < 0.01), with no significant associations between AMU and the biosecurity scores.
Overall, this study evidences that the production system and, to a lesser extent, the biosecurity measures, contribute to the AMR development in commensal E. coli and Enterococcus spp., with antimicrobial usage as the main differential factor, and demonstrates the potential value of these bacteria as bioindicators on pig farms in AMR surveillance programs.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)是人类和兽医学中抗菌药物使用(AMU)导致的全球公共卫生威胁。在食用动物生产中,管理、饲养或生物安全等因素可能会影响抗菌药物的使用。有机和粗放式伊比利亚猪生产基于更可持续和生态友好的管理系统,为评估抗菌药物使用的持续差异如何影响指示菌中的抗菌药物耐药性提供了绝佳机会。在此,我们在比较来自集约化和有机-粗放式生产系统的37个西班牙猪场时,考虑抗菌药物使用和生物安全措施(后者仅针对集约化猪场)的影响,评估共生大肠杆菌和肠球菌分离株作为抗菌药物耐药性生物指示物的效用。
生产系统是解释大肠杆菌和肠球菌中抗菌药物耐药性差异的主要因素。在这两种细菌中,与集约化猪群相比,泛敏感表型在有机-粗放式猪场中更为常见(p < 0.001)。对于大多数评估的抗菌药物,集约化猪场中共生大肠杆菌的微生物耐药性显著更高(p < 0.05)。在肠球菌中,林可酰胺类药物的使用揭示了抗菌药物耐药性与抗菌药物使用之间的关联,红霉素(p < 0.01)、奎奴普丁-达福普汀(p < 0.01)和多重耐药(MDR)表型(p < 0.05)的抗菌药物耐药性增加。集约化猪场实施的生物安全措施影响了这些生物指示物的抗菌药物耐药性,从清洁和消毒方案更好的猪场分离出的大肠杆菌对磺胺甲恶唑的耐药性略低(p < 0.01),对MDR表型的耐药性也略低(p < 0.05)。在这些集约化猪场中,我们还观察到与较小猪场相比,较大猪群的生物安全性更高(p < 0.01),抗菌药物使用与生物安全评分之间无显著关联。
总体而言,本研究证明生产系统以及在较小程度上生物安全措施促成了共生大肠杆菌和肠球菌中抗菌药物耐药性的发展,抗菌药物使用是主要差异因素,并证明了这些细菌作为猪场抗菌药物耐药性监测计划中生物指示物的潜在价值。