Evidence-Based Healthcare, Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e043525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043525.
To understand how and why workplace mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) work or do not work.
A realist review.
We considered any studies (experimental quasi-experimental, observational, qualitative and mixed-methods studies) of workplace MBPs as long as they provided data to explain our programme theories. All MBP formats and delivery modes were included.
Consistent with realist review methodology, we systematically screened and analysed data to explain how and why workplace MBPs work or do not work. These explanations were consolidated into a programme theory augmented by theories from organisational literature, such as conservation of resources theory.
Findings from 75 primary studies suggest that workplace MBPs enable participants (including healthcare professionals) to deal more skillfully with stressful events and improve their well-being. The mechanisms involved can be grouped around awareness/self-regulation, acceptance/compassion, feeling permitted to take care of self, sense of growth and promise of goal attainment. In order for professionals to invest in an MBP and benefit from it, it is important that they feel safe to engage with self-care at work and share emotional difficulties among peers. It is also important that employees are able to link the programme and its activities to existing goals and practices. Concerns of being non-productive, of not getting work done or of being exposed in front of colleagues can result in strategic use of brief mindfulness exercises, non-adherence or drop-out.
Simply offering an MBP to (healthcare) professionals in order to reduce stress and enhance well-being does not suffice. A supportive environment must exist in order for the programme's benefits to be reaped.
CRD42018086280.
了解工作场所正念干预计划(MBP)为何以及如何奏效或失效。
现实主义综述。
我们考虑了任何研究(实验性准实验、观察性、定性和混合方法研究),只要它们提供了解释我们计划理论的数据即可。包括所有 MBP 格式和交付模式。
根据现实主义综述方法,我们系统地筛选和分析数据,以解释工作场所 MBP 为何以及如何奏效或失效。这些解释被整合到一个计划理论中,并补充了组织文献中的理论,如资源保护理论。
75 项主要研究的结果表明,工作场所 MBP 使参与者(包括医疗保健专业人员)能够更熟练地应对压力事件并改善他们的幸福感。涉及的机制可以围绕意识/自我调节、接受/同情、被允许照顾自己、成长感和目标实现的承诺来分组。为了让专业人员投资于 MBP 并从中受益,重要的是他们感到在工作中参与自我保健是安全的,并可以与同事分享情感困难。员工能够将计划及其活动与现有目标和实践联系起来也很重要。担心没有效率、无法完成工作或在同事面前暴露自己,可能会导致对简短的正念练习的策略性使用、不遵守或退出。
仅仅向(医疗保健)专业人员提供 MBP 以减轻压力和增强幸福感是不够的。必须存在一个支持性的环境,才能获得该计划的益处。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018086280。