Department of Health Management & Policy, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, Room 365, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
Department of Social and Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Grover Center W356, 53 Richland Ave, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May;32(5):473-482. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01412-6. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative partnership approach that leverages the strengths of academic-community groups to address local problems. CBPR emphasizes equity (e.g., co-learning, power-sharing, participatory decision-making) among groups to achieve goals and promote sustainability. This study examines group dynamics, and their influence on achieving shared goals, within a CBPR-guided partnership established to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among underserved African American communities in St. Louis, Missouri.
We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with key academic and community informants and surveyed via email community collaborators involved in outreach activities. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently coded by two authors using an iterative, open-coding process to identify major themes. Surveys were summarized using similar coding criteria for open-ended responses and descriptive statistics for discrete responses. Using a grounded theory approach, we summarized and compared themes from each data source to identify similarities and differences and triangulated results to generate overarching thematic findings.
Participants described benefits from the partnership (funding; clinical, public health and evaluation expertise; training and networking opportunities) and found beneficial ways to leverage the partners' strengths in collaborating Participants expressed long-term commitment to sustaining the partnership and building capacity to address cancer disparities, but faced challenges related to power-sharing and participatory decision-making.
Using CBPR to address cancer disparities is an effective approach to capacity-building and achieving shared goals. By evaluating the structures and processes within CBPR collaborations through the lens of equity, partners may identify and address challenges that threaten long-term partnership sustainability.
基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)是一种协作伙伴关系方法,利用学术-社区团体的优势来解决当地问题。CBPR 强调团体之间的公平(例如,共同学习、权力共享、参与式决策),以实现目标并促进可持续性。本研究考察了在一个 CBPR 指导的伙伴关系中,群体动态及其对实现共同目标的影响,该伙伴关系旨在改善密苏里州圣路易斯服务不足的非裔美国社区的乳腺癌和前列腺癌结果。
我们对参与外联活动的主要学术和社区知情者进行了现场半结构化访谈,并通过电子邮件对社区合作者进行了调查。访谈被录音、转录,并由两位作者使用迭代的开放编码过程进行独立编码,以确定主要主题。使用类似的开放编码标准对调查的开放式回答进行总结,并对离散回答进行描述性统计,以总结调查结果。使用扎根理论方法,我们总结和比较了每个数据源的主题,以确定相似点和不同点,并对结果进行三角分析,以生成总体主题发现。
参与者描述了伙伴关系的好处(资金;临床、公共卫生和评估专业知识;培训和网络机会),并找到了利用合作伙伴优势进行合作的有益方式。参与者表示对长期承诺维持伙伴关系和建立解决癌症差异的能力,但面临与权力共享和参与式决策相关的挑战。
使用 CBPR 来解决癌症差异是一种有效的能力建设和实现共同目标的方法。通过从公平的角度评估 CBPR 合作中的结构和流程,合作伙伴可以确定和解决威胁长期伙伴关系可持续性的挑战。