Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, United States.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105715. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105715. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
In a previous real-world study, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke overall and severe stroke compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility in a different database of our previously observed results (Alberts M, et al. Stroke. 2020;51:549-555) on the risk of severe stroke among NVAF patients in a different population treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.
This retrospective cohort study included patients from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare databases (2011-2019) who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin after a diagnosis of NVAF, had ≥6 months of continuous health plan enrollment, had a CHADS-VASc score ≥2, and had no history of stroke or anticoagulant use. Patient data were assessed until the earliest occurrence of a primary inpatient diagnosis of stroke, death, end of health plan enrollment, or end of study. Stroke severity was defined by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, imputed by random forest model. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare risk of stroke between cohorts, balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting.
The mean observation period from index date to either stroke, or end of eligibility or end of data was 28 months. Data from 13,599 rivaroxaban and 39,861 warfarin patients were included. Stroke occurred in 272 rivaroxaban-treated patients (0.97/100 person-years [PY]) and 1,303 warfarin-treated patients (1.32/100 PY). Rivaroxaban patients had lower risk for stroke overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88) and for minor (NIHSS 1 to <5; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93), moderate (NIHSS 5 to <16; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99), and severe stroke (NIHSS 16 to 42; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91).
The results of this study in a larger population of NVAF patients align with previous real-world findings and the ROCKET-AF trial by showing improved stroke prevention with rivaroxaban versus warfarin across all stroke severities.
在之前的真实世界研究中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班降低了非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的中风总体风险和严重中风风险。本研究的目的是在不同的数据库中评估我们之前观察到的结果(Alberts M,等。中风。2020;51:549-555)的重现性,即在不同人群中,NVAF 患者使用利伐沙班或华法林治疗时严重中风的风险。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了来自 IBM® MarketScan®商业和医疗保险数据库(2011-2019 年)的患者,这些患者在诊断为 NVAF 后开始使用利伐沙班或华法林,连续健康计划参与时间≥6 个月,CHADS-VASc 评分≥2,且无中风或抗凝剂使用史。患者数据评估直至首次发生住院诊断为中风、死亡、健康计划参与结束或研究结束的最早时间。中风严重程度通过 NIHSS 评分(National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)定义,通过随机森林模型推断。使用 Cox 比例风险回归比较队列之间的中风风险,通过逆概率治疗加权进行平衡。
从索引日期到中风或资格结束或数据结束的平均观察期为 28 个月。纳入了 13599 名利伐沙班组和 39861 名华法林组患者的数据。272 名利伐沙班组患者(0.97/100 人年[PY])和 1303 名华法林组患者(1.32/100 PY)发生了中风。利伐沙班组患者的总体中风风险较低(风险比[HR],0.82;95%置信区间[CI],0.76-0.88),且轻度(NIHSS 1-<5;HR,0.83;95% CI,0.74-0.93)、中度(NIHSS 5-<16;HR,0.88;95% CI,0.78-0.99)和重度中风(NIHSS 16-42;HR,0.44;95% CI,0.22-0.91)风险也较低。
这项在更大 NVAF 患者人群中的研究结果与之前的真实世界研究结果以及 ROCKET-AF 试验一致,表明利伐沙班在所有中风严重程度上都比华法林更能预防中风。