• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决印度 2004-18 年估算灾难性卫生支出和贫困的数据分析和方法学局限性。

Addressing data and methodological limitations in estimating catastrophic health spending and impoverishment in India, 2004-18.

机构信息

Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01421-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-021-01421-6
PMID:33743735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7981828/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Estimates of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) are counterintuitive to researchers, policy makers, and developmental partners due to data and methodological limitation. While inferences drawn from use of capacity-to-pay (CTP) and budget share (BS) approaches are inconsistent, the non-availability of data on food expenditure in the health survey in India is an added limitation.

METHODS

Using data from the health and consumption surveys of National Sample Surveys over 14 years, we have overcome these limitations and estimated the incidence and intensity of CHE and impoverishment using the CTP approach.

RESULTS

The incidence of CHE for health services in India was 12.5% in 2004, 13.4% in 2014 and 9.1% by 2018. Among those households incurring CHE, they spent 1.25 times of their capacity to pay in 2004 (intensity of CHE), 1.71 times in 2014 and 1.31 times by 2018. The impoverishment due to health spending was 4.8% in 2004, 5.1% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018. The state variations in incidence and intensity of CHE and incidence of impoverishment is large. The concentration index (CI) of CHE was - 0.16 in 2004, - 0.18 in 2014 and - 0.22 in 2018 suggesting increasing inequality over time. The concentration curves based on CTP approach suggests that the CHE was concentrated among poor. The odds of incurring CHE were lowest among the richest households [OR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.24], households with elderly members [OR 1.20; 95% CI:1.12, 1.18] and households using both inpatient and outpatient services [OR 2.80, 95% CI 2.66, 2.95]. Access to health insurance reduced the chance of CHE and impoverishment among the richest households. The pattern of impoverishment was similar to that of CHE.

CONCLUSION

In the last 14 years, the CHE and impoverishment in India has declined while inequality in CHE has increased.

摘要

背景

由于数据和方法上的限制,灾难性卫生支出(CHE)的估计结果与研究人员、政策制定者和发展伙伴的预期相悖。虽然使用支付能力(CTP)和预算份额(BS)方法得出的推论并不一致,但印度卫生调查中缺乏关于食品支出的数据是一个额外的限制。

方法

利用国家抽样调查的卫生和消费调查 14 年来的数据,我们克服了这些限制,使用 CTP 方法估计了 CHE 和贫困的发生率和强度。

结果

印度卫生服务 CHE 的发生率在 2004 年为 12.5%,2014 年为 13.4%,2018 年为 9.1%。在发生 CHE 的家庭中,他们在 2004 年的支出是其支付能力的 1.25 倍(CHE 的强度),2014 年为 1.71 倍,2018 年为 1.31 倍。由于卫生支出导致的贫困率在 2004 年为 4.8%,2014 年为 5.1%,2018 年为 3.3%。CHE 的发生率和强度以及贫困发生率的州际差异很大。CHE 的集中指数(CI)在 2004 年为-0.16,2014 年为-0.18,2018 年为-0.22,表明不平等程度随时间增加。基于 CTP 方法的集中曲线表明, CHE 主要集中在贫困人口中。最富裕家庭发生 CHE 的几率最低[OR 0.22;95%CI:0.21,0.24],有老年成员的家庭[OR 1.20;95%CI:1.12,1.18]和同时使用住院和门诊服务的家庭[OR 2.80,95%CI 2.66,2.95]。获得医疗保险降低了最富裕家庭发生 CHE 和贫困的几率。贫困的模式与 CHE 相似。

结论

在过去的 14 年中,印度的 CHE 和贫困有所下降,而 CHE 的不平等程度有所增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/13d2259dfc06/12939_2021_1421_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/6cba13f5979c/12939_2021_1421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/67e81a4e607b/12939_2021_1421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/13d2259dfc06/12939_2021_1421_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/6cba13f5979c/12939_2021_1421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/67e81a4e607b/12939_2021_1421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/328c/7981828/13d2259dfc06/12939_2021_1421_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing data and methodological limitations in estimating catastrophic health spending and impoverishment in India, 2004-18.解决印度 2004-18 年估算灾难性卫生支出和贫困的数据分析和方法学局限性。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01421-6.
2
Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and impoverishment in tropical deltas: evidence from the Mekong Delta region.热带三角洲的灾难性医疗支出和贫困:来自湄公河三角洲地区的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 27;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0757-5.
3
Measurement and explanation of socioeconomic inequality in catastrophic health care expenditure: evidence from the rural areas of Shaanxi Province.灾难性卫生支出中社会经济不平等的测量与解释:来自陕西省农村地区的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 3;15:256. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0892-2.
4
Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh-an estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage.孟加拉国医疗保健支出的灾难性影响和与医疗保健自付费用相关的贫困问题——全民健康覆盖的财务风险保护评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx048.
5
Incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment among the elderly: an empirical evidence from India.老年人灾难性卫生支出和贫困的发生率和强度:来自印度的经验证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55142-1.
6
Assessing the household economic burden of non-communicable diseases in India: evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys.评估印度非传染性疾病的家庭经济负担:来自重复横断面调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 7;21(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10828-3.
7
Impact of out of pocket payments on financial risk protection indicators in a setting with no user fees: the case of Mauritius.在没有用户付费的情况下,自费支付对财务风险保护指标的影响:以毛里求斯为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 3;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0959-5.
8
Households forgoing healthcare as a measure of financial risk protection: an application to Liberia.作为金融风险保护措施而放弃医疗保健的家庭:以利比里亚为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 10;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1095-y.
9
Multidimensional poverty and catastrophic health spending in the mountainous regions of Myanmar, Nepal and India.缅甸、尼泊尔和印度山区的多维贫困与灾难性医疗支出。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 18;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0514-6.
10
Inequalities in financial risk protection in Bangladesh: an assessment of universal health coverage.孟加拉国金融风险保护方面的不平等:全民健康覆盖评估
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Apr 4;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0556-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of insomnia and its treatment-seeking among older adults in India.印度老年人失眠的患病率、预测因素及其寻求治疗的情况。
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Feb 1;3(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00044-w.
2
Catastrophic and impoverishing impacts of health expenditures: a focus on non-communicable diseases in Pokhara Metropolitan City, Nepal.医疗支出的灾难性和致贫影响:聚焦尼泊尔博卡拉市的非传染性疾病
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22418-8.
3
Catastrophic health expenditure associated with non-inpatient costs among middle-aged and older individuals in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Households forgoing healthcare as a measure of financial risk protection: an application to Liberia.作为金融风险保护措施而放弃医疗保健的家庭:以利比里亚为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 10;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1095-y.
2
Do poor people in the poorer states pay more for healthcare in India?印度较贫穷的邦的穷人在医疗保健方面的支出更多吗?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;19(1):1020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7342-8.
3
Measuring catastrophic medical expenditures: Reflections on three issues.衡量灾难性医疗支出:三个问题的思考。
中国中老年人群中与非住院费用相关的灾难性卫生支出
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;12:1454531. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454531. eCollection 2024.
4
District-level monitoring of universal health coverage, India.印度的全民健康覆盖区级监测。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Sep 1;102(9):630-638B. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290854. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
The Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) after four years of implementation - is it making an impact on quality of inpatient care and financial protection in India?《印度国家医保服务计划(AB-PMJAY)实施四年后——它对印度住院患者护理质量和财务保障产生影响了吗?》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11393-2.
6
Incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment among the elderly: an empirical evidence from India.老年人灾难性卫生支出和贫困的发生率和强度:来自印度的经验证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55142-1.
7
Hospitalisation expenditure on tuberculosis among tribal populations in India: A repeated cross-sectional analysis of national sample survey data, 2004 to 2018.印度部落人口结核病住院支出:基于2004年至2018年全国抽样调查数据的重复横断面分析
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Mar 5;7:100490. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100490. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Rural‒urban disparities in household catastrophic health expenditure in Bangladesh: a multivariate decomposition analysis.孟加拉国农村-城市家庭灾难性卫生支出的差异:多元分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 27;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02125-3.
9
Cancer care and economic burden-A narrative review.癌症护理与经济负担——一篇综述
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Dec;12(12):3042-3047. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1037_23. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis.印度南部邦的机构分娩公平吗?一项受益情况分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02097-4.
Health Econ. 2019 Jun;28(6):765-781. doi: 10.1002/hec.3881. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of caesarean births in public and private health centres in India.印度公立和私立医疗中心剖宫产的自费支出及相关因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;224:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Variations in catastrophic health expenditure across the states of India: 2004 to 2014.印度各邦灾难性卫生支出的差异:2004 年至 2014 年。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 22;13(10):e0205510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205510. eCollection 2018.
6
Catastrophic health spending in Europe: equity and policy implications of different calculation methods.欧洲灾难性卫生支出:不同计算方法的公平性及其政策含义。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 1;96(9):599-609. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.209031. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Measuring financial protection against catastrophic health expenditures: methodological challenges for global monitoring.衡量针对灾难性卫生支出的财务保护:全球监测的方法学挑战。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 31;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0749-5.
8
Disease-specific out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure on hospitalization in India: Do Indian households face distress health financing?印度住院治疗的特定疾病自付费用和灾难性卫生支出:印度家庭面临困境性卫生筹资吗?
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196106. eCollection 2018.
9
Inequity in out-of-pocket payments for hospitalisation in India: Evidence from the National Sample Surveys, 1995-2014.印度住院自费支出的不平等:来自全国抽样调查 1995-2014 年的数据证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;201:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
10
Geographic Variation in Household and Catastrophic Health Spending in India: Assessing the Relative Importance of Villages, Districts, and States, 2011-2012.印度家庭和灾难性卫生支出的地域差异:评估村庄、地区和邦的相对重要性,2011-2012 年。
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):167-206. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12315.