Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(1):6-28. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0002.
The third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) and its descriptive psychiatry-based intellectual antecedents imagined psychiatric disorders as discontinuous categories, presumably natural kinds, that would be empirically validated based on future scientific studies. Validation would emerge from a predicted convergence of clinical descriptions (symptom clusters that could be shown to be stable over the lifespan), laboratory results, and family studies. That future science is now arriving, but rather than validating the categorical DSM approach, large-scale genetics along with modern neurobiology and epidemiology have emphatically undercut it. Clinical description, laboratory studies, and family (now genetic) studies do not converge at all on distinct categories. Rather, modern studies are consistent with psychiatric disorders as heterogeneous quantitative deviations from health. The characteristics of these disorders have proven to be discoverable rather than invented and thus are grounded in nature. However, scientific results demonstrate that psychiatric disorders cannot reasonably be understood as discrete categories-and certainly not as natural kinds.
《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-III)第三版及其基于描述性精神病学的先验知识将精神障碍想象为不连续的类别,大概是自然类别,这些类别将基于未来的科学研究得到经验验证。验证将来自临床描述(可以证明在整个生命周期内稳定的症状群)、实验室结果和家族研究的预期趋同。未来的科学现在已经到来,但大规模遗传学以及现代神经生物学和流行病学并没有验证分类的 DSM 方法,而是强烈地削弱了它。临床描述、实验室研究和家族(现在是遗传)研究根本没有集中在明确的类别上。相反,现代研究表明,精神障碍是从健康状态偏离的异质定量,具有多样性。这些疾病的特征被证明是可发现的,而不是发明的,因此是基于自然的。然而,科学结果表明,精神障碍不能合理地理解为离散的类别,更不能理解为自然类别。