Reimer Shelby L, Beniac Daniel R, Hiebert Shannon L, Booth Timothy F, Chong Patrick M, Westmacott Garrett R, Zhanel George G, Bay Denice C
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 5;12:628801. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628801. eCollection 2021.
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) produced by Gram-negative bacteria are mediators of cell survival and pathogenesis by facilitating virulence factor dissemination and resistance to antimicrobials. Studies of OMV properties often focus on hypervesiculating mutants that have increased OMV production when compared to their corresponding wild-type (WT) strains. Currently, two conventional techniques, ultracentrifugation (UC) and ultradiafiltration (UF), are used interchangeably to isolate OMVs, however, there is concern that each technique may inadvertently alter the properties of isolated OMVs during study. To address this concern, we compared two OMV isolation methods, UC and UF, with respect to final OMV quantities, size distributions, and morphologies using a hypervesiculating K-12 Δ mutant. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) indicated that UC techniques result in lower vesicle yields compared to UF. However, UF permitted isolation of OMVs with smaller average sizes than UC, highlighting a potential OMV isolation size bias by each technique. Cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) visualization of isolated OMVs revealed distinct morphological differences between WT and Δ OMVs, where Δ OMVs isolated by either UC or UF method possessed a greater proportion of OMVs with two or more membranes. Proteomic OMV analysis of WT and Δ OMVs confirmed that Δ enhances inner plasma membrane carryover in multi-lamellar OMVs. This study demonstrates that UC and UF are useful techniques for OMV isolation, where UF may be preferable due to faster isolation, higher OMV yields and enrichment of smaller sized vesicles.
革兰氏阴性菌产生的外膜囊泡(OMV)通过促进毒力因子传播和对抗菌药物的抗性,成为细胞存活和发病机制的介质。对OMV特性的研究通常集中在超囊泡化突变体上,与相应的野生型(WT)菌株相比,这些突变体的OMV产量有所增加。目前,两种传统技术,即超速离心(UC)和超滤(UF),可交替用于分离OMV,然而,有人担心每种技术在研究过程中可能会无意中改变分离出的OMV的特性。为了解决这一问题,我们使用超囊泡化的K-12Δ突变体,比较了两种OMV分离方法,即UC和UF,在最终OMV数量、大小分布和形态方面的差异。纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)表明,与UF相比,UC技术产生的囊泡产量较低。然而,UF允许分离出平均尺寸比UC小的OMV,这突出了每种技术在OMV分离尺寸上的潜在偏差。对分离出的OMV进行低温透射电子显微镜(cryo-TEM)观察,发现WT和ΔOMV之间存在明显的形态差异,通过UC或UF方法分离出的ΔOMV中,具有两个或更多膜的OMV比例更高。对WT和ΔOMV进行蛋白质组学分析证实,Δ增强了多层OMV中内膜的残留。这项研究表明,UC和UF是用于OMV分离的有用技术,其中UF可能更可取,因为其分离速度更快、OMV产量更高且能富集较小尺寸的囊泡。