• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向得分调整后的网络调查估计值的季度校准数据与年度校准数据比较

Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates.

作者信息

Irimata Katherine E, He Yulei, Cai Bill, Shin Hee-Choon, Parsons Van L, Parker Jennifer D

机构信息

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD.

出版信息

Surv Methods Insights Field. 2020;2020. doi: 10.13094/SMIF-2020-00018. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

DOI:10.13094/SMIF-2020-00018
PMID:33748097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7976170/
Abstract

While web surveys have become increasingly popular as a method of data collection, there is concern that estimates obtained from web surveys may not reflect the target population of interest. Web survey estimates can be calibrated to existing national surveys using a propensity score adjustment, although requirements for the size and collection timeline of the reference data set have not been investigated. We evaluate health outcomes estimates from the National Center for Health Statistics' Research and Development web survey. In our study, the 2016 National Health Interview Survey as well as its quarterly subsets are considered as reference datasets for the web data. It is demonstrated that the calibrated health estimates overall vary little when using the quarterly or yearly data, suggesting that there is flexibility in selecting the reference dataset. This finding has many practical implications for constructing reference data, including the reduced cost and burden of a smaller sample size and a more flexible timeline.

摘要

虽然网络调查作为一种数据收集方法越来越受欢迎,但人们担心从网络调查中获得的估计值可能无法反映目标感兴趣的人群。网络调查估计值可以使用倾向得分调整来校准到现有的全国性调查,尽管参考数据集的规模和收集时间线的要求尚未得到研究。我们评估了美国国家卫生统计中心研发网络调查中的健康结果估计值。在我们的研究中,2016年全国健康访谈调查及其季度子集被视为网络数据的参考数据集。结果表明,使用季度或年度数据时,校准后的健康估计值总体差异不大,这表明在选择参考数据集方面具有灵活性。这一发现对构建参考数据有许多实际意义,包括降低较小样本量的成本和负担以及更灵活的时间线。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates.倾向得分调整后的网络调查估计值的季度校准数据与年度校准数据比较
Surv Methods Insights Field. 2020;2020. doi: 10.13094/SMIF-2020-00018. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Propensity-score Adjusted Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes From the Research and Development Survey.倾向评分调整估计值对研究与开发调查中选定健康结果的影响。
Vital Health Stat 1. 2022 Nov(196):1-20.
3
Overview and Initial Results of the National Center for Health Statistics' Research and Development Survey.国家卫生统计中心研发调查概述及初步结果
Stat J IAOS. 2020 Nov 25;36(4):1199-1211. doi: 10.3233/sji-200678.
4
An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours.评价倾向评分调整是否可以消除针对敏感健康行为的网络面板调查中固有的选择偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4.
5
The National Center for Health Statistics' 2015 and 2016 Research and Development Surveys.国家卫生统计中心的 2015 年和 2016 年研究与发展调查。
Vital Health Stat 1. 2020 Oct(59):1-60.
6
Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey.美国国家卫生统计中心研究与发展调查的校准加权方法
Vital Health Stat 2. 2023 Mar(199):1-23.
7
The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.多模式数据收集在随机数字拨号手机调查中对年轻人的应用:可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e31545. doi: 10.2196/31545.
8
The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的研发调查(RANDS)
Stat J IAOS. 2022 Mar 21;38(1):13-21. doi: 10.3233/SJI-210880.
9
Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.通过有向无环图的可变纳入策略,以调整易受选择偏倚影响的健康调查,从而得出全国性估计值。
J Off Stat. 2022 Sep;38(3):875-900. doi: 10.2478/jos-2022-0038.
10
National estimates from the Youth '19 Rangatahi smart survey: A survey calibration approach.《青年 19 岁 Rangatahi 智能调查:调查校准方法》全国估计数。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251177. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple imputation of missing data with skip-pattern covariates: a comparison of alternative strategies.带有跳跃模式协变量的缺失数据多重填补:替代策略比较
J Stat Comput Simul. 2023;94(7):1543-1570. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2023.2293124.
2
Bias-Adjusted Predictions of County-Level Vaccination Coverage from the COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey.从 COVID-19 趋势和影响调查中进行偏倚调整的县一级疫苗接种率预测。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):175-188. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231218024. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
3
Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.通过有向无环图的可变纳入策略,以调整易受选择偏倚影响的健康调查,从而得出全国性估计值。
J Off Stat. 2022 Sep;38(3):875-900. doi: 10.2478/jos-2022-0038.
4
The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的研发调查(RANDS)
Stat J IAOS. 2022 Mar 21;38(1):13-21. doi: 10.3233/SJI-210880.
5
Overview and Initial Results of the National Center for Health Statistics' Research and Development Survey.国家卫生统计中心研发调查概述及初步结果
Stat J IAOS. 2020 Nov 25;36(4):1199-1211. doi: 10.3233/sji-200678.
6
Impact of Kidney Failure Risk Prediction Clinical Decision Support on Monitoring and Referral in Primary Care Management of CKD: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.肾衰竭风险预测临床决策支持对慢性肾脏病初级保健管理中监测与转诊的影响:一项随机实用临床试验
Kidney Med. 2022 May 28;4(7):100493. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100493. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
National Health Interview Survey, COVID-19, and Online Data Collection Platforms: Adaptations, Tradeoffs, and New Directions.国家健康访谈调查、COVID-19 和在线数据收集平台:适应、权衡和新方向。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Dec;111(12):2167-2175. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306516.

本文引用的文献

1
National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.国家卫生统计中心比例数据呈现标准
Vital Health Stat 2. 2017 Aug(175):1-22.
2
Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.将观察性研究结果推广:将倾向评分方法应用于复杂调查。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):284-303. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12090. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.使用估计倾向得分进行匹配:理论与实践的关联
Biometrics. 1996 Mar;52(1):249-64.