• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较多光谱图像处理方法在 BrainWeb 合成数据和真实磁共振图像中的脑组织分类。

Comparison of Multispectral Image-Processing Methods for Brain Tissue Classification in BrainWeb Synthetic Data and Real MR Images.

机构信息

Center for QUantitative Imaging in Medicine (CQUIM), Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 7;2021:9820145. doi: 10.1155/2021/9820145. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/9820145
PMID:33748284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7959972/
Abstract

Accurate quantification of brain tissue is a fundamental and challenging task in neuroimaging. Over the past two decades, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and FMRIB's Automated Segmentation Tool (FAST) have been widely used to estimate gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes. However, they cannot reliably estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes. To address this problem, we developed the TRIO algorithm (TRIOA), a new magnetic resonance (MR) multispectral classification method. SPM8, SPM12, FAST, and the TRIOA were evaluated using the BrainWeb database and real magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. In this paper, the MR brain images of 140 healthy volunteers (51.5 ± 15.8 y/o) were obtained using a whole-body 1.5 T MRI system (Aera, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Before classification, several preprocessing steps were performed, including skull stripping and motion and inhomogeneity correction. After extensive experimentation, the TRIOA was shown to be more effective than SPM and FAST. For real data, all test methods revealed that the participants aged 20-83 years exhibited an age-associated decline in GM and WM volume fractions. However, for CSF volume estimation, SPM8-s and SPM12-m both produced different results, which were also different compared with those obtained by FAST and the TRIOA. Furthermore, the TRIOA performed consistently better than both SPM and FAST for GM, WM, and CSF volume estimation. Compared with SPM and FAST, the proposed TRIOA showed more advantages by providing more accurate MR brain tissue classification and volume measurements, specifically in CSF volume estimation.

摘要

准确量化脑组织是神经影像学中的一项基本且具有挑战性的任务。在过去的二十年中,统计参数映射(SPM)和 FMRIB 的自动分割工具(FAST)已被广泛用于估计灰质(GM)和白质(WM)体积。然而,它们不能可靠地估计脑脊髓液(CSF)体积。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了 TRIO 算法(TRIOA),这是一种新的磁共振(MR)多谱分类方法。使用 BrainWeb 数据库和真实磁共振成像(MRI)数据评估了 SPM8、SPM12、FAST 和 TRIOA。在本文中,使用全身 1.5T MRI 系统(Aera,Siemens,Erlangen,德国)获得了 140 名健康志愿者(51.5±15.8 岁)的 MR 脑图像。在分类之前,进行了几个预处理步骤,包括颅骨剥离和运动和不均匀性校正。经过广泛的实验,TRIOA 被证明比 SPM 和 FAST 更有效。对于真实数据,所有测试方法都表明,年龄在 20-83 岁的参与者的 GM 和 WM 体积分数随年龄增长而下降。然而,对于 CSF 体积估计,SPM8-s 和 SPM12-m 都产生了不同的结果,与 FAST 和 TRIOA 的结果也不同。此外,TRIOA 在 GM、WM 和 CSF 体积估计方面的表现均优于 SPM 和 FAST。与 SPM 和 FAST 相比,所提出的 TRIOA 通过提供更准确的 MR 脑组织分类和体积测量,特别是在 CSF 体积估计方面,具有更多优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/2174d47f3ec0/BMRI2021-9820145.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/b495db6cf665/BMRI2021-9820145.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/d9334f9ca4b4/BMRI2021-9820145.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/2174d47f3ec0/BMRI2021-9820145.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/b495db6cf665/BMRI2021-9820145.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/d9334f9ca4b4/BMRI2021-9820145.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3478/7959972/2174d47f3ec0/BMRI2021-9820145.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Multispectral Image-Processing Methods for Brain Tissue Classification in BrainWeb Synthetic Data and Real MR Images.比较多光谱图像处理方法在 BrainWeb 合成数据和真实磁共振图像中的脑组织分类。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 7;2021:9820145. doi: 10.1155/2021/9820145. eCollection 2021.
2
Segmentation of gray matter, white matter, and CSF with fluid and white matter suppression using MP2RAGE.采用 MP2RAGE 对灰质、白质和 CSF 进行分割,同时抑制脑脊液和白质信号。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1540-1550. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26014. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of whole brain segmentation and volume estimation in children and young adults using SPM and SyMRI.SPM 和 SyMRI 比较儿童和青年大脑整体分割和体积估计。
Clin Imaging. 2019 Sep-Oct;57:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
3D cerebral MR image segmentation using multiple-classifier system.使用多分类器系统的3D脑磁共振图像分割
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Mar;55(3):353-364. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1483-z. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation.用于脑磁共振图像分割的SPM、FSL和Brainsuite的定量比较。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2014 Mar 8;4(1):13-26. eCollection 2014 Mar.
6
Anatomically guided voxel-based partial volume effect correction in brain PET: impact of MRI segmentation.基于解剖学引导的体素式部分容积效应校正在脑 PET 中的应用:MRI 分割的影响。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2012 Dec;36(8):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
7
Fast and accurate pseudo multispectral technique for whole-brain MRI tissue classification.快速准确的伪多谱技术用于全脑 MRI 组织分类。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jul 11;64(14):145005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab239e.
8
Robust volume assessment of brain tissues for 3-dimensional fourier transformation MRI via a novel multispectral technique.通过一种新型多光谱技术对三维傅里叶变换磁共振成像的脑组织进行稳健的体积评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 24;10(2):e0115527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115527. eCollection 2015.
9
Measured volumes using segmented tissue probability data obtained using statistical parametric mapping 12 were not influenced by the contrasts of analyzed images.使用统计参数映射 12 获得的分段组织概率数据测量的体积不受分析图像对比的影响。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.059. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Reliability assessment of tissue classification algorithms for multi-center and multi-scanner data.多中心多扫描仪数据的组织分类算法的可靠性评估。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116928. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116928. Epub 2020 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Brain Changes in Patients with Congenital Anosmia: MRI-Based Analysis of Gray- and White-Matter Volumes.先天性嗅觉缺失患者的脑结构变化:基于MRI的灰质和白质体积分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;15(15):1927. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151927.
2
Quantitative Measurement of Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid by Cascade Artificial Intelligence Models in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.采用级联人工智能模型对自发性颅内低压患者的脊髓脑脊液进行定量测量。
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 22;10(8):2049. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10082049.
3
Review: Emerging Eye-Based Diagnostic Technologies for Traumatic Brain Injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation.使用深度卷积神经网络进行新生儿脑图像分割。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Mar 26;14:207. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00207. eCollection 2020.
2
Knowing What You Know in Brain Segmentation Using Bayesian Deep Neural Networks.利用贝叶斯深度神经网络进行脑部分割时了解自身所知。
Front Neuroinform. 2019 Oct 17;13:67. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2019.00067. eCollection 2019.
3
Fast and accurate pseudo multispectral technique for whole-brain MRI tissue classification.快速准确的伪多谱技术用于全脑 MRI 组织分类。
综述:创伤性脑损伤的新兴眼部诊断技术。
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2023;16:530-559. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2022.3161352. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jul 11;64(14):145005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab239e.
4
Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions.用于脑磁共振成像分割的深度学习:现状与未来方向。
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):449-459. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4.
5
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks.基于深度神经网络的脑肿瘤分割。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
Self-Trained Supervised Segmentation of Subcortical Brain Structures Using Multispectral Magnetic Resonance Images.使用多光谱磁共振图像对皮质下脑结构进行自训练监督分割
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:764383. doi: 10.1155/2015/764383. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
7
How Does the Accuracy of Intracranial Volume Measurements Affect Normalized Brain Volumes? Sample Size Estimates Based on 966 Subjects from the HUNT MRI Cohort.颅内体积测量的准确性如何影响标准化脑容量?基于HUNT MRI队列中966名受试者的样本量估计。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):1450-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4299. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Robust volume assessment of brain tissues for 3-dimensional fourier transformation MRI via a novel multispectral technique.通过一种新型多光谱技术对三维傅里叶变换磁共振成像的脑组织进行稳健的体积评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 24;10(2):e0115527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115527. eCollection 2015.
9
Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation.用于脑磁共振图像分割的SPM、FSL和Brainsuite的定量比较。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2014 Mar 8;4(1):13-26. eCollection 2014 Mar.
10
Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance.准确自动估计总颅内体积:一个麻烦程度较低的干扰变量。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:366-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.034. Epub 2014 Oct 1.