• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用针型抓钳的改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的比较

Modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

作者信息

Chen Yang, Guo Shi-Gang, Fu Xin-Ao, Fan Zong-Qi, Yuan Jie-Qing, Zhang Xiao-Xin, Liu Huan, Liu Zhu, Huang Yong-Shuai, Song Lei

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chaoyang Central Hospital, China Medical University, Chaoyang 122000, Liaoning Province, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Postgraduate Training Base of China Medical University and Jinzhou Medical University, Chaoyang 122000, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):102607. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607.

DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607
PMID:40291869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12019042/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is an advanced minimally invasive surgery that involves the use of upgraded instruments and equipment. We previously modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy with needle-type grasping forceps (mSLAN) for patients with simple appendicitis, but the feasibility and safety of our modified procedure need further evaluation in a high-quality clinical study.

AIM

To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of mSLAN with those of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS

This single-center, single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial included patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at our center between April 2024 and August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the mSLAN group or the CLA group computer-generated randomization. The primary endpoint was the 24-hour postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the secondary endpoints included the operative time, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response biomarkers (including white blood cells, the neutrophil ratio, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein), time to first postoperative exhaust, time to first out-of-bed activity, postoperative length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: The mSLAN group ( = 36) and the CLA group ( = 36). The 24-hour VAS scores, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response marker levels, first postoperative exhaust times, first out-of-bed activity times, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, operative times, or hospitalization costs did not significantly differ between the two groups. No postoperative complications, including incision infection or hernia, abdominal abscess or intestinal obstruction, were observed during the 1-month postoperative follow-up in either group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the CLA protocol, the mSLAN protocol for acute uncomplicated appendicitis yielded comparable short-term clinical outcomes, with a similar operative time and better cosmetic outcomes, indicating its potential for clinical application and superiority for patients with high cosmetic requirements. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种先进的微创手术,需要使用升级的仪器设备。我们之前对单纯性阑尾炎患者采用针型抓钳改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(mSLAN),但我们改良手术的可行性和安全性需要在高质量的临床研究中进一步评估。

目的

比较mSLAN与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎患者的短期临床疗效。

方法

本单中心、单盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验纳入了2024年4月至2024年8月期间在本中心接受急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的患者。患者通过计算机生成随机化被随机分为mSLAN组或CLA组。主要终点是术后24小时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,次要终点包括手术时间、术后24小时炎症反应生物标志物(包括白细胞、中性粒细胞比例、白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白)、首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、住院费用以及术后并发症发生率。

结果

共纳入72例患者并随机分为两组:mSLAN组(n = 36)和CLA组(n = 36)。两组间术后24小时VAS评分、术后24小时炎症反应标志物水平、首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、手术时间或住院费用均无显著差异。两组在术后1个月的随访中均未观察到术后并发症,包括切口感染或疝、腹腔脓肿或肠梗阻。

结论

与CLA术式相比,mSLAN术式治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的短期临床疗效相当,手术时间相似且美容效果更佳,表明其具有临床应用潜力,对有高美容需求的患者具有优势。需要进一步研究评估其长期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/9f730eee7693/102607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/32523ffe2da6/102607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/0db47af2ab22/102607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/9640295870a6/102607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/9f730eee7693/102607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/32523ffe2da6/102607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/0db47af2ab22/102607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/9640295870a6/102607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/12019042/9f730eee7693/102607-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.使用针型抓钳的改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的比较
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):102607. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607.
2
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study.经脐单孔与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的单中心回顾性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Aug;50(8):3000605221119647. doi: 10.1177/03000605221119647.
3
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Case series.使用针型抓钳的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎:病例系列
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;70:216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.040. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
5
A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.前瞻性、随机对照试验比较单切口腹腔镜与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):950-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
6
<Editors' Choice> Advantages of gasless single-port transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children in China: a multi-institutional retrospective study.<编辑推荐>在中国,无气单孔经脐腔外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术治疗儿童单纯性急性阑尾炎的优势:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2022 Nov;84(4):848-856. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.84.4.848.
7
Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SCAR trial).单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项多中心随机对照试验(SCAR试验)。
Int J Surg Protoc. 2021 Aug 30;25(1):201-208. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.159. eCollection 2021.
9
Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis: A case report.使用针型抓钳的改良技术方案用于急性单纯性阑尾炎的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:病例报告
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):3328-3333. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3328.
10
Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus transumbilical and suprapubic single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using only conventional laparoscopic instruments.传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与经脐和耻骨上单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(仅使用传统腹腔镜器械)的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3623-3629. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02683-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis: A case report.使用针型抓钳的改良技术方案用于急性单纯性阑尾炎的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:病例报告
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):3328-3333. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3328.
2
Single-port vs. three-port for laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术单孔与三孔的比较
Asian J Surg. 2024 Dec;47(12):5355-5356. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.06.048. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统方法的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1667-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10659-w. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
4
Single-incision versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Asian J Surg. 2024 Feb;47(2):864-873. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.179. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment for acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;47(10):102241. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102241. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.阑尾炎的诊断与治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):8933-8990. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10456-5. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
7
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus appendectomy or antibiotics in the modern approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗与阑尾切除术或抗生素在单纯性急性阑尾炎的现代治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2023 Dec;174(6):1292-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
8
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study.经脐单孔与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的单中心回顾性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Aug;50(8):3000605221119647. doi: 10.1177/03000605221119647.
9
Randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis.随机临床试验比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎:荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100.
10
Single-incision compared with conventional laparoscopy for appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Sep;37(9):1925-1935. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04231-6. Epub 2022 Aug 8.