• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在妊娠期间抗血栓形成(DASH-TOP)的共同决策中进行决策分析:一项序贯解释性混合方法试点研究方案。

Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e046021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046021.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046021
PMID:33753445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986891/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Decision analysis is a quantitative approach to decision making that could bridge the gap between decisions based solely on evidence and the unique values and preferences of individual patients, a feature especially important when existing evidence cannot support clear recommendations and there is a close balance between harms and benefits for the treatments options under consideration. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy represents one such situation. The objective of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology of a pilot study that will explore the application of decision analysis to a shared decision-making process involving prophylactic LMWH for pregnant women or those considering pregnancy who have experienced a VTE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct an international, mixed methods, explanatory, sequential study, including quantitative data collection and analysis followed by qualitative data collection and analysis. In step I, we will ask women who are pregnant or considering pregnancy and have experienced VTE to participate in a shared decision-making intervention for prophylactic LMWH. The intervention consists of three components: a direct choice exercise, a values elicitation exercise and a personalised decision analysis. After administration of the intervention, we will ask women to make a treatment decision and measure decisional conflict, self-efficacy and satisfaction. In step II, which follows the analysis of quantitative data, we will use the results to inform the qualitative interview. Step III will be a qualitative descriptive study that explores participants' experiences and perceptions of the intervention. In step IV, we will integrate findings from the qualitative and quantitative analyses to obtain meta-inferences.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Site-specific ethics boards have approved the study. All participants will provide informed consent. The research team will take an integrated approach to knowledge translation.

摘要

简介

决策分析是一种定量决策方法,可以弥合仅基于证据的决策与个体患者独特价值观和偏好之间的差距,当现有证据无法支持明确的建议且考虑中的治疗方案的利弊之间存在紧密平衡时,这种方法尤为重要。低分子肝素(LMWH)用于预防妊娠期间的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)就是这种情况之一。本文的目的是描述一项试点研究的原理和方法,该研究将探索将决策分析应用于涉及有 VTE 病史或有妊娠计划的孕妇预防性使用 LMWH 的共享决策制定过程。

方法和分析

我们将进行一项国际性、混合方法、解释性、序贯研究,包括定量数据收集和分析,随后是定性数据收集和分析。在步骤 I 中,我们将邀请已经经历 VTE 的正在怀孕或有妊娠计划的女性参与预防性 LMWH 的共享决策干预。干预措施包括三个部分:直接选择练习、价值评估练习和个性化决策分析。在干预措施实施后,我们将要求女性做出治疗决策,并测量决策冲突、自我效能和满意度。在步骤 II 中,紧随定量数据分析之后,我们将使用结果来为定性访谈提供信息。步骤 III 将是一项定性描述性研究,旨在探讨参与者对干预措施的体验和看法。在步骤 IV 中,我们将整合定性和定量分析的结果,以获得元推断。

伦理和传播

特定地点的伦理委员会已经批准了这项研究。所有参与者都将提供知情同意。研究团队将采取综合方法进行知识转化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ea9d6335bbe5/bmjopen-2020-046021f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/aba39e29953f/bmjopen-2020-046021f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/d3f256767709/bmjopen-2020-046021f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ece72aa17d38/bmjopen-2020-046021f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ebfe45b1f908/bmjopen-2020-046021f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ea9d6335bbe5/bmjopen-2020-046021f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/aba39e29953f/bmjopen-2020-046021f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/d3f256767709/bmjopen-2020-046021f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ece72aa17d38/bmjopen-2020-046021f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ebfe45b1f908/bmjopen-2020-046021f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b3/7986891/ea9d6335bbe5/bmjopen-2020-046021f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol.在妊娠期间抗血栓形成(DASH-TOP)的共同决策中进行决策分析:一项序贯解释性混合方法试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e046021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046021.
2
Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed-methods pilot study.决策分析在妊娠期间血栓预防中的共享决策(DASH-TOP):一项序贯解释性混合方法试点研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):309-319. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112098. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study.采用决策冲突量表评估静脉血栓栓塞症预防共享决策干预(DASH-TOP):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02349-3.
4
Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).静脉血栓栓塞症、易栓症、抗栓治疗与妊娠:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第8版)
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):844S-886S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0761.
5
Women's values and preferences on low-molecular-weight heparin and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review.女性对低分子肝素和妊娠的价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05042-x.
6
Women's values and preferences and health state valuations for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy: A cross-sectional interview.女性在妊娠期的血栓预防中的价值观、偏好和健康状态评估:一项横断面访谈。
Thromb Res. 2016 Apr;140:22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.015.
7
Values and preferences towards the use of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy: a convergent mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the decision analysis in shared decision making for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy (DASH-TOP) study.孕期使用预防性低分子量肝素的价值观和偏好:来自孕期血栓预防共同决策中的决策分析(DASH-TOP)研究数据的聚合混合方法二次分析
Thromb J. 2024 Sep 6;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00648-x.
8
Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol.评估妊娠期患者对血栓预防决策的价值观和偏好:一项研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 May 30;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-40.
9
Women's values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy: a comparison of direct-choice and decision analysis using patient specific utilities.孕期女性对血栓预防的价值观和偏好:使用患者特定效用的直接选择与决策分析比较
Thromb Res. 2015 Aug;136(2):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 22.
10
Low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: Rationale and design of the Highlow study, a randomised trial of two doses.低分子量肝素预防妊娠期复发性静脉血栓栓塞:高低剂量研究的原理和设计,一项随机双剂量试验。
Thromb Res. 2016 Aug;144:62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study.采用决策冲突量表评估静脉血栓栓塞症预防共享决策干预(DASH-TOP):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02349-3.
2
Women's values and preferences on low-molecular-weight heparin and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review.女性对低分子肝素和妊娠的价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05042-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Tool for Health Utility Assessments: The Gambler II.健康效用评估自动化工具:赌徒二号。
MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Mar 18;5(1):2381468320914307. doi: 10.1177/2381468320914307. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
2
Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.国际妊娠期静脉血栓栓塞症预防与治疗指南的评价:系统综述。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1183-3.
3
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.
探索和引出医疗产品生命周期中患者偏好的方法:文献综述。
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jul;24(7):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Clinical decision analysis and model-based economic evaluation studies in perinatology: A systematic review.围产医学中临床决策分析和基于模型的经济评价研究:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Aug;98(8):967-975. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13590. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.美国血液学会 2018 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:妊娠相关静脉血栓栓塞症。
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3317-3359. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024802.
6
Shared decision-making tool for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation - A feasibility study.房颤患者抗栓治疗的决策辅助工具——一项可行性研究。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Clinical decision analysis in perinatology.围产医学中的临床决策分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):491-499. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13264. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
9
Use of decision aids for shared decision making in venous thromboembolism: A systematic review.使用决策辅助工具促进静脉血栓栓塞症的共同决策:系统评价。
Thromb Res. 2016 Jul;143:71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Pregnancy and the Culture of Extreme Risk Aversion.怀孕与极端风险规避文化
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(2):21-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1120801.