• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康效用评估自动化工具:赌徒二号。

Automated Tool for Health Utility Assessments: The Gambler II.

作者信息

Adejare Adeboye A, Eckman Mark H

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Division of General Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Mar 18;5(1):2381468320914307. doi: 10.1177/2381468320914307. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2381468320914307
PMID:32215320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7081474/
Abstract

The Gambler II is a web-based utility assessment tool supporting visual analogue scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) utility assessments. It contains novel features, including an easy to use project development authoring tool and use of multimedia clips for health state descriptions. Evaluate the usability and understandability of the patient-facing side of The Gambler. Investigate the feasibility of using The Gambler and evaluate its impact on patient knowledge regarding the relevant health states. We used The Gambler to assess utilities on a convenience sample of 55 users for common long-term complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus: diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic foot infection requiring transmetatarsal amputation. Using VAS, SG, and TTO, we collected metadata, such as time spent on each assessment and the entire assessment process. We evaluated usability with an adaptation of the System Usability Scale survey and understandability. We evaluated impact on knowledge gained through knowledge assessments about these complications before and after use of The Gambler. Overall satisfaction with The Gambler was high, 4.02 on a 5-point scale. Usability rated highly at 84.93 on a normalized scale between 0 and 100. Knowledge scores increased significantly following use of The Gambler from pretest mean of 68% to posttest mean of 76% ( < 0.01). Average time using the software: ∼7½ minutes. The Gambler is an easy to use and understand computer-based tool for utility assessment. It is feasible to use within clinical encounters to support shared decision making, and it has unique features that make it a powerful tool for investigators interested in research on health utilities.

摘要

“赌徒二号”是一款基于网络的效用评估工具,支持视觉模拟量表(VAS)、标准博弈法(SG)和时间权衡法(TTO)效用评估。它具有一些新颖的功能,包括易于使用的项目开发创作工具以及用于健康状态描述的多媒体片段。评估“赌徒”面向患者一侧的可用性和易懂性。调查使用“赌徒”的可行性,并评估其对患者有关相关健康状态知识的影响。我们使用“赌徒”对55名用户的便利样本进行效用评估,这些用户患有2型糖尿病的常见长期并发症:糖尿病神经病变、糖尿病视网膜病变以及需要经跖骨截肢的糖尿病足部感染。我们使用VAS、SG和TTO收集元数据,例如每次评估以及整个评估过程所花费的时间。我们通过改编系统可用性量表调查来评估可用性以及易懂性。我们通过对使用“赌徒”前后有关这些并发症的知识评估来评估其对知识获取的影响。对“赌徒”的总体满意度较高,在5分制量表上为4.02分。在0至100的标准化量表上,可用性评分高达84.93分。使用“赌徒”后,知识得分从测试前的平均68%显著提高到测试后的平均76%(P<0.01)。使用该软件的平均时间约为7分半钟。“赌徒”是一款易于使用和理解的基于计算机的效用评估工具。在临床诊疗过程中使用它来支持共同决策是可行的,并且它具有独特的功能,使其成为对健康效用研究感兴趣的研究人员的有力工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/bacb96516a87/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/4e5a3f8736a9/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/2c107d24353c/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/1102e8daef28/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/bacb96516a87/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/4e5a3f8736a9/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/2c107d24353c/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/1102e8daef28/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f61/7081474/bacb96516a87/10.1177_2381468320914307-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Automated Tool for Health Utility Assessments: The Gambler II.健康效用评估自动化工具:赌徒二号。
MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Mar 18;5(1):2381468320914307. doi: 10.1177/2381468320914307. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
2
Implementing a Health Utility Assessment Platform to Acquire Health Utilities in a Hemodialysis Outpatient Setting: Feasibility Study.在血液透析门诊环境中实施健康效用评估平台以获取健康效用:可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 28;6(7):e33562. doi: 10.2196/33562.
3
The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia.轻度和重度发音障碍的健康效用。
Laryngoscope. 2020 May;130(5):1256-1262. doi: 10.1002/lary.28216. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
4
Development, feasibility, and validity of a computer-based utility assessment tool for measuring asthma-specific health utilities in Malaysia using the standard gamble method.一种基于计算机的效用评估工具的开发、可行性及有效性,该工具使用标准博弈法测量马来西亚哮喘特异性健康效用。
J Asthma. 2016 Oct;53(8):835-42. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1156694. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.心理健康服务使用者、医疗保健专业人员和普通公众对不同健康状况赋予了哪些效用评分?一项共同制定的混合方法在线调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0205223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205223. eCollection 2018.
6
Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.在韩国人群中,标准博弈法与评分量表及时间权衡技术相比的可行性、可比性和可靠性。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3387-3397. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1676-4. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
7
Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.照料者和父母身份对健康状态描述的时间权衡和标准博弈效用评分的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 9;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-48.
8
Measurement and comparison of health utility assessments in chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎健康效用评估的测量与比较
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Oct;5(10):929-36. doi: 10.1002/alr.21556. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients.视觉模拟量表(VAS)得出的标准博弈(SG)效用与健康效用指数效用是否一致?类风湿性关节炎患者对健康状况的患者和社区偏好比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Apr 20;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-25.
10
Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.健康评估研究中时间权衡法和标准博弈法评估的有效性、可行性及可接受性:新加坡多民族亚洲人群的一项研究
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00361.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study.采用决策冲突量表评估静脉血栓栓塞症预防共享决策干预(DASH-TOP):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02349-3.
2
Implementing a Health Utility Assessment Platform to Acquire Health Utilities in a Hemodialysis Outpatient Setting: Feasibility Study.在血液透析门诊环境中实施健康效用评估平台以获取健康效用:可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 28;6(7):e33562. doi: 10.2196/33562.
3
Incorporating Patients' Values and Preferences Into Decision Making About Transplantation of HCV-Naïve Recipients With Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors: A Feasibility Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving health communication with photographic images that increase identification in three minority populations.提高健康传播效果的照片选择:增加三个少数民族群体的认同感。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):145-158. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy054.
2
A Computer-Assisted Personal Interview App in Research Electronic Data Capture for Administering Time Trade-off Surveys (REDCap): Development and Pretest.一种用于在研究电子数据采集(REDCap)中管理时间权衡调查的计算机辅助个人访谈应用程序:开发与预测试。
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Jan 23;2(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/formative.8202.
3
Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice.
将患者的价值观和偏好纳入关于接受来自丙型肝炎病毒血症供体肾脏的初治丙型肝炎病毒受体移植决策的可行性研究
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Oct 29;6(2):23814683211056537. doi: 10.1177/23814683211056537. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
4
Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol.在妊娠期间抗血栓形成(DASH-TOP)的共同决策中进行决策分析:一项序贯解释性混合方法试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e046021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046021.
开发一种对话辅助工具以支持共同决策:抗凝药物选择设计的思考
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Shared Decision-Making Tool for Self-Management of Home Therapies for Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者家庭治疗自我管理的共同决策工具
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jun 23;2(1):2381468317715621. doi: 10.1177/2381468317715621. eCollection 2017 Jan-Jun.
5
Shared decision-making tool for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation - A feasibility study.房颤患者抗栓治疗的决策辅助工具——一项可行性研究。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
A Time-Motion Study of Primary Care Physicians' Work in the Electronic Health Record Era.电子健康记录时代基层医疗医生工作的时间动作研究
Fam Med. 2018 Feb;50(2):91-99. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.184803.
7
Challenges to measuring and achieving shared decision-making in practice.在实践中衡量和实现共同决策面临的挑战。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/hex.12659.
8
Shared decision making: everyone wants it, so why isn't it happening?共同决策:人人都想要它,可为什么它没有实现呢?
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):117-118. doi: 10.1002/wps.20407.
9
Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.患者使用住院个人健康记录的体验。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jun 1;7(2):446-60. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-10-RA-0130. eCollection 2016.
10
Acute care patient portals: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on current practices.急性护理患者门户网站:对利益相关者对当前实践看法的定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e9-e17. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw081.