Suppr超能文献

《抱怨词典:理解威胁性语言的使用》

The Grievance Dictionary: Understanding threatening language use.

机构信息

Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK.

Dawes Centre for Future Crime, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2105-2119. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01536-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Abstract

This paper introduces the Grievance Dictionary, a psycholinguistic dictionary that can be used to automatically understand language use in the context of grievance-fueled violence threat assessment. We describe the development of the dictionary, which was informed by suggestions from experienced threat assessment practitioners. These suggestions and subsequent human and computational word list generation resulted in a dictionary of 20,502 words annotated by 2318 participants. The dictionary was validated by applying it to texts written by violent and non-violent individuals, showing strong evidence for a difference between populations in several dictionary categories. Further classification tasks showed promising performance, but future improvements are still needed. Finally, we provide instructions and suggestions for the use of the Grievance Dictionary by security professionals and (violence) researchers.

摘要

本文介绍了“怨愤词典”,这是一种心理语言学词典,可以用于在与怨愤相关的暴力威胁评估语境下自动理解语言使用。我们描述了词典的开发过程,该过程得到了有经验的威胁评估从业者的建议。这些建议以及随后的人工和计算词汇表生成,产生了一个包含 20502 个单词的词典,由 2318 名参与者进行了注释。通过将词典应用于暴力和非暴力个体所写的文本,该词典得到了验证,表明在几个词典类别中,群体之间存在明显差异。进一步的分类任务显示出有希望的性能,但仍需要进一步改进。最后,我们为安全专业人员和(暴力)研究人员提供了使用“怨愤词典”的说明和建议。

相似文献

1
The Grievance Dictionary: Understanding threatening language use.
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2105-2119. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01536-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Developing and validating the self-transcendent emotion dictionary for text analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0239050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239050. eCollection 2020.
3
Threats to public figures and association with approach, as a proxy for violence: The importance of grievance.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:998155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998155. eCollection 2022.
4
Grievance-fueled violence can be better understood using an enactive approach.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:997121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997121. eCollection 2022.
6
Grievance-fueled sexual violence.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1070484. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1070484. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of the Japanese Version of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Dictionary 2015.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 7;13:841534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841534. eCollection 2022.
8
Promotion and prevention regulatory focus LIWC dictionary. Polish adaptation and validation.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288726. eCollection 2023.
9
Applying a Computer-Assisted Tool for Semantic Analysis of Writing: Uses for STEM and ELL.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2019 Apr 26;20(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v20i1.1709. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural Language Analysis and the Psychology of Verbal Behavior: The Past, Present, and Future States of the Field.
J Lang Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;40(1):21-41. doi: 10.1177/0261927x20967028. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Online validation of combined mood induction procedures.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 4;14(6):e0217848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217848. eCollection 2019.
3
Mental Disorders, Personality Traits, and Grievance-Fueled Targeted Violence: The Evidence Base and Implications for Research and Practice.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):459-470. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1475392. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
5
Profiling School Shooters: Automatic Text-Based Analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 3;6:86. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00086. eCollection 2015.
6
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):158-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
7
Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Oct;54(10):1372-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1372.
8
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1296-312. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验