Graduate Program in Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil; Fishing Ecology, management and economics group, Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Fishing Ecology, management and economics group, Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil; Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 15;288:112372. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112372. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Many global management and conservation initiatives fail to prevent overfishing either because they do not plan for local engagement, surveillance, and enforcement, and/or because they fail to include alternatives for short-term losses. Thus, these initiatives do not gain support among fishers. In this study, we interviewed fishers to investigate their stated behavior toward fisheries regulations. We assessed possible (non)compliant behavior under scenarios where fishers would face a moratorium on some of their target species. Additionally, we investigated the consequences of such a moratorium on the food web if it were to lead to fishing alternative species. Using data from two Brazilian coastal sites, we found that younger fishers and those who demonstrated a trustworthy relationship with stakeholders were inclined to comply with the rules. The level of potential compliance also varied between the studied places, probably due to unidentified local idiosyncrasies. Fishers tended to trust community actors (e.g., the leader or head of the fishing community) more than institutional actors (e.g., environmental agencies). When fishers were asked why they would choose specific replacement species in the event of a moratorium, they most often cited expected profitability and ease of capture as reasons. Fishers also tended to say that they would replace endangered species with species in the same and/or lower trophic categories. We suggest working toward stronger stakeholder engagement, given that an overall sense of trust in a community appears to be an important asset toward successful management. Higher levels of trust could promote more transparency in the decision-making process, which could facilitate information dissemination, awareness, and the need for compliance. The mixed methods approach used here could help predict responses to new and existing management policies and support adaptive fisheries management.
许多全球管理和保护倡议未能防止过度捕捞,要么是因为它们没有计划进行当地参与、监测和执法,要么是因为它们未能为短期损失提供替代方案。因此,这些倡议在渔民中没有得到支持。在这项研究中,我们采访了渔民,以调查他们对渔业法规的陈述行为。我们评估了在渔民面临某些目标物种禁渔的情况下可能出现的(不合规)行为。此外,我们还调查了如果转而捕捞替代物种,这种禁渔对食物网的后果。利用来自两个巴西沿海地点的数据,我们发现,年轻的渔民和那些与利益相关者建立了可信赖关系的渔民更倾向于遵守规则。潜在合规水平在研究地点之间也有所不同,这可能是由于未确定的当地特殊性。渔民往往更信任社区行为者(例如,渔业社区的领导或负责人)而不是机构行为者(例如,环境机构)。当被问及如果禁渔,他们为什么会选择特定的替代物种时,渔民们最常提到预期的盈利能力和捕捞的容易性作为原因。渔民们还倾向于说,他们会用同一营养级或更低营养级的物种来替代濒危物种。我们建议加强利益相关者的参与,因为对社区的总体信任感似乎是成功管理的重要资产。更高的信任度可以促进决策过程中的透明度,从而促进信息传播、意识和合规性的需要。这里使用的混合方法方法可以帮助预测对新的和现有的管理政策的反应,并支持适应性渔业管理。