• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

投资回报率:雇主赞助的数字化强化生活方式干预、减重带来的医疗储蓄。

Return on Investment: Medical Savings of an Employer-Sponsored Digital Intensive Lifestyle Intervention, Weight Loss.

机构信息

Rally Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Apr;29(4):654-661. doi: 10.1002/oby.23117.

DOI:10.1002/oby.23117
PMID:33759385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8252728/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the medical cost impact and return on investment (ROI) of a large, commercial, digital, weight-management intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) program (Real Appeal).

METHODS

Participants in this program were compared with a control group matched by age, sex, geographic region, health risk, baseline medical costs, and chronic conditions. Medical costs were defined as the total amount paid for all medical expenses, inclusive of both the insurers' and the study participants' responsibility.

RESULTS

In the 3 years following program registration, the intent-to-treat (ITT) cohort had significantly lower medical expenditures than the matched controls, with an average of -$771 or 12% lower costs (P = 0.002). Among 4,790 ITT participants, a total savings of $3,693,090 compared with total program costs of $1,639,961 translated into a 2.3:1 ROI. Program completers (n = 3,990), who attended more sessions than the overall ITT group, had greater mean weight loss (-4.4%), greater cost savings (-$956 or 14%), and an ROI of 2.0:1 over the 3-year time frame compared with matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrated that the digital weight-management ILI was associated with a significantly positive ROI. Employers and payers willing to cover the cost of an ILI that produces both weight loss and demonstrated cost benefits can improve health and save money for their population with overweight or obesity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估大型商业数字化体重管理强化生活方式干预(ILI)计划(Real Appeal)的医疗成本影响和投资回报率(ROI)。

方法

将该计划的参与者与通过年龄、性别、地理区域、健康风险、基线医疗费用和慢性病匹配的对照组进行比较。医疗费用被定义为所有医疗费用的总支出,包括保险公司和研究参与者的责任。

结果

在计划注册后的 3 年内,意向治疗(ITT)队列的医疗支出明显低于匹配对照组,平均节省 -771 美元,即节省 12%的费用(P=0.002)。在 4790 名 ITT 参与者中,与总计划成本 1639961 美元相比,总共节省了 3693090 美元,换算成 ROI 为 2.3:1。与匹配对照组相比,完成计划(n=3990)的参与者,即参加课程次数超过总体 ITT 组的参与者,体重减轻幅度更大(-4.4%),成本节省更多(-956 美元,即 14%),在 3 年的时间框架内,ROI 为 2.0:1。

结论

研究结果表明,数字化体重管理 ILI 与显著的正 ROI 相关。愿意支付既能减轻体重又能带来成本效益的 ILI 费用的雇主和支付方可以改善其超重或肥胖人群的健康状况并节省资金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0614/8252728/7072a9505d8c/OBY-29-654-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0614/8252728/2d52aa36cef4/OBY-29-654-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0614/8252728/7072a9505d8c/OBY-29-654-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0614/8252728/2d52aa36cef4/OBY-29-654-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0614/8252728/7072a9505d8c/OBY-29-654-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Return on Investment: Medical Savings of an Employer-Sponsored Digital Intensive Lifestyle Intervention, Weight Loss.投资回报率:雇主赞助的数字化强化生活方式干预、减重带来的医疗储蓄。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Apr;29(4):654-661. doi: 10.1002/oby.23117.
2
Employee and Employer Benefits From a Migraine Management Program: Disease Outcomes and Cost Analysis.员工和雇主从偏头痛管理项目中获益:疾病结局和成本分析。
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):1947-1960. doi: 10.1111/head.13933. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.纽约市体重管理倡议的财务影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246621. eCollection 2021.
4
Economic value of nonsurgical weight loss in adults with obesity.肥胖成年人非手术减肥的经济价值。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):37-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20036. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
A return-on-investment simulation model of workplace obesity interventions.工作场所肥胖干预措施的投资回报率模拟模型
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jul;51(7):751-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a86656.
6
The Influence of a Wearable-Based Reward Program on Health Care Costs: Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.基于可穿戴设备的奖励计划对医疗费用的影响:回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e45064. doi: 10.2196/45064.
7
An evaluation of the Well at Dell health management program: health risk change and financial return on investment.戴尔健康管理项目之健康评估:健康风险变化与投资财务回报
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):147-57. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131115-QUAN-582.
8
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.投资回报率:对美国公共资助计划生育项目的效益和成本节约情况进行更全面的评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):696-749. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12080. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
9
Medical cost savings for participants and nonparticipants in health risk assessments, lifestyle management, disease management, depression management, and nurseline in a large financial services corporation.大型金融服务公司中,健康风险评估、生活方式管理、疾病管理、抑郁管理和护理热线参与者和非参与者的医疗费用节省。
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(4):245-52. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090805-QUAN-253.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of a Diabetes Pay-For-Performance Program in Diabetes Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions.针对患有多种慢性病的糖尿病患者的糖尿病按效付费项目的成本效益
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0133163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133163. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care resource utilization and health care costs among digital weight-loss intervention participants and nonparticipants.数字减肥干预参与者和非参与者的医疗保健资源利用情况及医疗保健成本。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2025 Sep;33(9):1637-1644. doi: 10.1002/oby.24337. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
2
Differential effect by chronic disease risk: A secondary analysis of the ChooseWell 365 randomized controlled trial.慢性病风险的差异效应:ChooseWell 365随机对照试验的二次分析
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Apr 20;42:102736. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102736. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
The Impact of a Digital Weight Loss Intervention on Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Compared Between Users and Nonusers With Overweight and Obesity: Retrospective Analysis Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018.成年人肥胖和重度肥胖的患病率:美国,2017-2018 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Feb(360):1-8.
2
DEBATE: Do interventions based on behavioral theory work in the real world?辩论:基于行为理论的干预措施在现实世界中是否有效?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Apr 25;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0795-4.
3
Behavioral Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
数字减肥干预对超重和肥胖患者的医疗资源利用和成本的影响:用户与非用户之间的回顾性分析研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 24;11:e47473. doi: 10.2196/47473.
4
Economic Evaluation Associated With Clinical-Grade Mobile App-Based Digital Therapeutic Interventions: Systematic Review.基于临床级移动应用的数字治疗干预措施的经济评估:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 1;25:e47094. doi: 10.2196/47094.
5
An Innovative Approach to Employer-Provided Benefits for Obesity Care: A Case Report on H-E-B's Healthier Lifestyle Choices Program.雇主提供肥胖症护理福利的创新方法:关于H-E-B更健康生活方式选择计划的案例报告。
NAM Perspect. 2022 Sep 19;2022. doi: 10.31478/202209a. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessing the Clinical Robustness of Digital Health Startups: Cross-sectional Observational Analysis.评估数字健康创业公司的临床稳健性:横断面观察性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 20;24(6):e37677. doi: 10.2196/37677.
行为体重管理干预以预防成年人肥胖相关的发病率和死亡率:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1163-1171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13022.
4
Implementing an Online Weight-Management Intervention to an Employee Population: Initial Experience with Real Appeal.实施在线体重管理干预措施于员工群体:真实吸引力的初步经验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Nov;26(11):1704-1708. doi: 10.1002/oby.22309. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Perceptions of Barriers to Effective Obesity Care: Results from the National ACTION Study.有效肥胖症护理的障碍认知:全国行动研究的结果
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jan;26(1):61-69. doi: 10.1002/oby.22054. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Engagement and outcomes in a digital Diabetes Prevention Program: 3-year update.数字糖尿病预防计划的参与情况与成果:三年期更新
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Sep 7;5(1):e000422. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000422. eCollection 2017.
7
Fifty Years of Behavioral/Lifestyle Interventions for Overweight and Obesity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?针对超重和肥胖的行为/生活方式干预五十年:我们走过了哪些历程,又将走向何方?
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25(11):1867-1875. doi: 10.1002/oby.21914. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Weight Loss and Improvement in Comorbidity: Differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and Over.体重减轻与合并症改善:5%、10%、15%及以上的差异
Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Jun;6(2):187-194. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0262-y.
9
Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?真实世界证据——它是什么以及能告诉我们什么?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
10
Clinical and Economic Impact of a Digital, Remotely-Delivered Intensive Behavioral Counseling Program on Medicare Beneficiaries at Risk for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease.数字远程强化行为咨询计划对有糖尿病和心血管疾病风险的医疗保险受益人在临床和经济方面的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0163627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163627. eCollection 2016.