• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可穿戴设备的奖励计划对医疗费用的影响:回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。

The Influence of a Wearable-Based Reward Program on Health Care Costs: Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

机构信息

Clinical Evidence Development, Aetna Medical Affairs, CVS Health, Hartford, CT, United States.

Aetna Digital Product Development, CVS Health, Wellesley, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e45064. doi: 10.2196/45064.

DOI:10.2196/45064
PMID:36917152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mHealth) technology holds great promise as an easily accessible and effective solution to improve population health at scale. Despite the abundance of mHealth offerings, only a minority are grounded in evidence-based practice, whereas even fewer have line of sight into population-level health care spending, limiting the clinical utility of such tools.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the influence of a health plan-sponsored, wearable-based, and reward-driven digital health intervention (DHI) on health care spending over 1 year. The DHI was delivered through a smartphone-based mHealth app available only to members of a large commercial health plan and leveraged a combination of behavioral economics, user-generated sensor data from the connected wearable device, and claims history to create personalized, evidence-based recommendations for each user.

METHODS

This study deployed a propensity score-matched, 2-group, and pre-post observational design. Adults (≥18 years of age) enrolled in a large, national commercial health plan and self-enlisted in the DHI for ≥7 months were allocated to the intervention group (n=56,816). Members who were eligible for the DHI but did not enlist were propensity score-matched to the comparison group (n=56,816). Average (and relative change from baseline) medical and pharmacy spending per user per month was computed for each member of the intervention and comparison groups during the pre- (ie, 12 months) and postenlistment (ie, 7-12 months) periods using claims data.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and medical spending were similar between groups (P=.89). On average, the total included sample population (N=113,632) consisted of young to middle-age (mean age 38.81 years), mostly White (n=55,562, 48.90%), male (n=46,731, 41.12%) and female (n=66,482, 58.51%) participants. Compared to a propensity score-matched cohort, DHI users demonstrated approximately US $10 per user per month lower average medical spending (P=.02) with a concomitant increase in preventive care activities and decrease in nonemergent emergency department admissions. These savings translated to approximately US $6.8 million in avoidable health care costs over the course of 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

This employer-sponsored, digital health engagement program has a high likelihood for return on investment within 1 year owing to clinically meaningful changes in health-seeking behaviors and downstream medical cost savings. Future research should aim to elucidate health behavior-related mechanisms in support of these findings and continue to explore novel strategies to ensure equitable access of DHIs to underserved populations that stand to benefit the most.

摘要

背景

移动医疗(mHealth)技术具有巨大的潜力,可以作为一种易于获取和有效的解决方案,大规模改善人口健康。尽管有大量的 mHealth 产品,但只有少数产品基于循证实践,而更少的产品能够直接了解人口层面的医疗保健支出,从而限制了这些工具的临床实用性。

目的

本研究旨在探讨一项健康计划赞助的、基于可穿戴设备的、奖励驱动的数字健康干预(DHI)对 1 年医疗保健支出的影响。该 DHI 通过仅向大型商业健康计划的成员提供的基于智能手机的 mHealth 应用程序提供,利用行为经济学、来自连接的可穿戴设备的用户生成的传感器数据以及索赔历史记录,为每个用户创建个性化的、基于证据的建议。

方法

本研究采用倾向评分匹配的、2 组和前后观测设计。参加大型全国性商业健康计划且自我注册 DHI 时间≥7 个月的成年人(≥18 岁)被分配到干预组(n=56816)。有资格参加 DHI 但未注册的成员通过倾向评分匹配到对照组(n=56816)。使用索赔数据,在注册前(即 12 个月)和注册后(即 7-12 个月)期间,计算每个干预组和对照组成员的每月每位用户的平均(和基线的相对变化)医疗和药房支出。

结果

基线特征和医疗支出在组间相似(P=.89)。平均而言,总纳入样本人群(N=113632)由年轻到中年(平均年龄 38.81 岁)组成,大多数为白人(n=55562,48.90%),男性(n=46731,41.12%)和女性(n=66482,58.51%)参与者。与倾向评分匹配队列相比,DHI 用户的平均医疗支出每月约低 10 美元/用户(P=.02),同时预防性护理活动增加,非紧急急诊入院减少。这些节省在 1 年内转化为约 680 万美元的可避免医疗保健费用。

结论

由于在寻求医疗保健行为方面发生了有临床意义的变化,并且医疗成本节省了,这项雇主赞助的数字健康参与计划在 1 年内很有可能实现投资回报。未来的研究应旨在阐明与健康行为相关的机制,以支持这些发现,并继续探索确保 DHIs 公平惠及最受益人群的新策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6f/10131601/c48b4f32f3b1/jmir_v25i1e45064_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6f/10131601/c48b4f32f3b1/jmir_v25i1e45064_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6f/10131601/c48b4f32f3b1/jmir_v25i1e45064_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of a Wearable-Based Reward Program on Health Care Costs: Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.基于可穿戴设备的奖励计划对医疗费用的影响:回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e45064. doi: 10.2196/45064.
2
Utilization and Cost of an Employer-Sponsored Comprehensive Primary Care Delivery Model.雇主赞助的综合初级保健提供模式的利用和成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3803.
3
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Drug use and spending under a formulary informed by cost-effectiveness.基于成本效益的用药清单下的药物使用和支出。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Nov;29(11):1175-1183. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.11.1175.
6
Evaluation of a Diabetes Self-Management Program: Claims Analysis on Comorbid Illnesses, Health Care Utilization, and Cost.一项糖尿病自我管理项目的评估:关于合并症、医疗保健利用及成本的索赔分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 22;20(6):e207. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9225.
7
Effect of Adding Telephone-Based Brief Coaching to an mHealth App (Stay Strong) for Promoting Physical Activity Among Veterans: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于 mHealth 应用(保持强壮)的电话式简短辅导对促进退伍军人身体活动的效果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e19216. doi: 10.2196/19216.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT.数字化智能手机干预识别和管理精神分裂症早期预警信号以预防复发:EMPOWER 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(27):1-174. doi: 10.3310/HLZE0479.
10
The Impact of a Digital Weight Loss Intervention on Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Compared Between Users and Nonusers With Overweight and Obesity: Retrospective Analysis Study.数字减肥干预对超重和肥胖患者的医疗资源利用和成本的影响:用户与非用户之间的回顾性分析研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 24;11:e47473. doi: 10.2196/47473.

本文引用的文献

1
How health systems facilitate patient-centered care and care coordination: a case series analysis to identify best practices.医疗体系如何促进以患者为中心的医疗和医疗协调:案例系列分析以确定最佳实践。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):1448. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08623-w.
2
The Influence of Wearables on Health Care Outcomes in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review.可穿戴设备对慢性病医疗效果的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):e36690. doi: 10.2196/36690.
3
2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.
《2022年糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Spring;35(2):137-149. doi: 10.2337/ds22-ps02. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of behavior change communication apps: Assessment of key methods.行为改变沟通应用程序成本效益分析的系统评价:关键方法评估
Digit Health. 2021 Mar 26;7:20552076211000559. doi: 10.1177/20552076211000559. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Is it worth it? Cost-effectiveness analysis of a commercial physical activity app.值得吗?一款商业化身体活动应用的成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1950. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11988-y.
6
Systematic review of context-aware digital behavior change interventions to improve health.系统评价情境感知型数字行为改变干预措施对健康的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1037-1048. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa099.
7
Mobile Apps for Health Behavior Change in Physical Activity, Diet, Drug and Alcohol Use, and Mental Health: Systematic Review.移动应用程序在身体活动、饮食、药物和酒精使用以及心理健康方面的健康行为改变:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 18;8(3):e17046. doi: 10.2196/17046.
8
Digital Health Behavior Change Technology: Bibliometric and Scoping Review of Two Decades of Research.数字健康行为改变技术:二十年研究的文献计量和范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 13;7(12):e13311. doi: 10.2196/13311.
9
Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances.卫生技术评估中的倾向得分方法:原理、扩展应用及最新进展
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 18;10:973. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00973. eCollection 2019.
10
Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice.帮助患者自助:初级卫生保健实践中自我管理支持策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.