Suppr超能文献

液晶显示器(LCD)在视觉系统临床评估和实验研究中的非彩色、平均调制闪烁。

Liquid-Crystal Display (LCD) of achromatic, mean-modulated flicker in clinical assessment and experimental studies of visual systems.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248180. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Achromatic, mean-modulated flicker-wherein luminance increments and decrements of equal magnitude are applied, over time, to a test field-is commonly used in both clinical assessment of vision and experimental studies of visual systems. However, presenting flicker on computer-controlled displays is problematic; displays typically introduce luminance artifacts at high flicker frequency or contrast, potentially interfering with the validity of findings. Here, we present a battery of tests used to weigh the relative merits of two displays for presenting achromatic, mean-modulated flicker. These tests revealed marked differences between a new high-performance liquid-crystal display (LCD; EIZO ColorEdge CG247X) and a new consumer-grade LCD (Dell U2415b), despite displays' vendor-supplied specifications being almost identical. We measured displayed luminance using a spot meter and a linearized photodiode. We derived several measures, including spatial uniformity, the effect of viewing angle, response times, Fourier amplitude spectra, and cycle-averaged luminance. We presented paired luminance pulses to quantify the displays' nonlinear dynamics. The CG247X showed relatively good spatial uniformity (e.g., at moderate luminance, standard deviation 2.8% versus U2415b's 5.3%). Fourier transformation of nominally static test patches revealed spectra free of artifacts, with the exception of a frame response. The CG247X's rise and fall times depended on both the luminance from which, and to which, it responded, as is to be generally expected from LCDs. Despite this nonlinear behaviour, we were able to define a contrast and frequency range wherein the CG247X appeared largely artifact-free; the relationship between nominal luminance and displayed luminance was accurately modelled using a causal, linear time-invariant system. This range included contrasts up to 80%, and flicker frequencies up to 30 Hz. This battery of tests should prove useful to others conducting clinical assessment of vision and experimental studies of visual systems.

摘要

无彩色、平均调制闪烁-其中亮度的增减幅度相等,随时间施加于测试场-常用于临床评估视力和视觉系统的实验研究。然而,在计算机控制的显示器上呈现闪烁是有问题的;显示器通常在高闪烁频率或对比度下引入亮度伪影,可能干扰发现的有效性。在这里,我们提出了一系列测试来权衡两种用于呈现无彩色、平均调制闪烁的显示器的相对优点。这些测试揭示了新型高性能液晶显示器 (EIZO ColorEdge CG247X) 和新型消费级液晶显示器 (Dell U2415b) 之间的显著差异,尽管显示器的供应商提供的规格几乎相同。我们使用点光度计和线性化光电二极管测量显示亮度。我们得出了几个度量标准,包括空间均匀性、视角效应、响应时间、傅里叶幅度谱以及平均周期亮度。我们呈现了成对的亮度脉冲来量化显示器的非线性动态。CG247X 显示出相对较好的空间均匀性(例如,在中等亮度下,标准偏差为 2.8%,而 U2415b 为 5.3%)。名义上静态测试补丁的傅里叶变换显示出无伪影的光谱,除了一个帧响应。CG247X 的上升和下降时间取决于其响应的亮度,这是液晶显示器的一般预期。尽管存在这种非线性行为,我们还是能够定义一个对比度和频率范围,其中 CG247X 看起来基本上没有伪影;使用因果、线性时不变系统准确地建模了名义亮度和显示亮度之间的关系。该范围包括高达 80%的对比度和高达 30 Hz 的闪烁频率。这套测试应该对进行视力临床评估和视觉系统实验研究的其他人有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb1/7990305/c523cb318858/pone.0248180.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验