School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle, Staffordshire, UK.
Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Mar 24;16(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00913-w.
Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation.
The clinical consultation is of pivotal importance in addressing barriers to treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to agree to the content of the 'model Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultation' within the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study.
A Delphi survey was co-designed with patients and clinical stakeholders using an evidence synthesis of current guidelines and content from frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence. Patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, their carers, FLS clinicians and osteoporosis specialists were sent three rounds of the Delphi survey. Participants were presented with potential consultation content and asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and to suggest new statements (Round 1). Lowest rated statements were removed or amended after Rounds 1 and 2. In Round 3, participants were asked whether each statement was 'essential' and percentage agreement calculated; the study team subsequently determined the threshold for essential content.
Seventy-two, 49 and 52 patients, carers and clinicians responded to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One hundred twenty-two statements were considered. By Round 3, consensus was reached, with 81 statements deemed essential within FLS consultations, relating to greeting/introductions; gathering information; considering therapeutic options; eliciting patient perceptions; establishing shared decision-making preferences; sharing information about osteoporosis and treatments; checking understanding/summarising; and signposting next steps.
This Delphi consensus exercise has summarised for the first time patient/carer and clinician consensus regarding clearly defined tasks for clinicians in a model FLS consultation.
临床咨询对于解决治疗依从性障碍至关重要。本研究的目的是在 iFraP(提高骨折预防药物治疗的接受度)研究中就“模型骨折联络服务(FLS)咨询”的内容达成共识。
使用当前指南的证据综合以及共享决策、沟通和药物依从性框架和理论的内容,与患者和临床利益相关者共同设计了一项 Delphi 调查。将骨质疏松症和/或脆性骨折患者及其照顾者、FLS 临床医生和骨质疏松症专家发送了三回合 Delphi 调查。参与者被提供了潜在的咨询内容,并被要求对每一项陈述的重要性进行 5 点李克特量表评分,并提出新的陈述(第一轮)。在第一轮和第二轮之后,删除或修改了评分最低的陈述。在第三轮中,参与者被要求回答每个陈述是否“必不可少”,并计算百分比协议;研究小组随后确定了必不可少内容的阈值。
分别有 72、49 和 52 名患者、照顾者和临床医生对第一轮、第二轮和第三轮做出了回应。考虑了 122 个陈述。到第三轮,达成了共识,81 项陈述被认为是 FLS 咨询中必不可少的,涉及问候/介绍;收集信息;考虑治疗方案;引出患者的看法;建立共同决策偏好;共享骨质疏松症和治疗信息;检查理解/总结;以及指明下一步。
这项 Delphi 共识性实践首次总结了患者/照顾者和临床医生对模型 FLS 咨询中临床医生明确任务的共识。