Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 May;33(5):515-520. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000284. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
The neurobiological basis of neuroticism in late-life depression (LLD) is understudied. We hypothesized that older depressed subjects scoring high in measures of neuroticism would have smaller hippocampal and prefrontal volumes compared with non-neurotic older depressed subjects and with nondepressed comparison subjects based on previous research. Non-demented subjects were recruited and were either depressed with high neuroticism (n = 65), depressed with low neuroticism (n = 36), or never depressed (n = 27). For imaging outcomes focused on volumetric analyses, we found no significant between-group differences in hippocampal volume. However, we found several frontal lobe regions for which depressed subjects with high neuroticism scores had smaller volumes compared with non-neurotic older depressed subjects and with nondepressed comparison subjects, controlling for age and gender. These regions included the frontal pole, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and left pars orbitalis. In addition, we found that non-neurotic depressed subjects had a higher volume of non-white matter hypointensities on T1-weighted images (possibly related to cerebrovascular disease) than did neurotic depressed subjects. Our finding that depressed subjects low in neuroticism had higher volumes of non-white matter hypointensities is consistent with prior literature on "vascular depression." In contrast, the finding that those high in neuroticism had smaller frontal volume than depressed subjects low in neuroticism and never-depressed subjects highlight the importance of frontal circuitry in the subgroup of older depressed individuals with comorbid neuroticism. Together, these results implicate different neural mechanisms in older neurotic and non-neurotic depressed groups and suggest that multiple biological pathologies may lead to different clinical expressions of LLD.
老年期抑郁症(LLD)中神经质的神经生物学基础研究较少。我们假设,与非神经质的老年抑郁患者和未抑郁的对照组相比,神经质得分较高的老年抑郁患者的海马体和前额叶体积较小,这是基于先前的研究。招募了非痴呆受试者,他们要么抑郁且神经质得分高(n = 65),要么抑郁且神经质得分低(n = 36),要么从未抑郁过(n = 27)。对于关注容积分析的成像结果,我们没有发现组间海马体体积存在显著差异。然而,我们发现了几个额叶区域,与非神经质的老年抑郁患者和未抑郁的对照组相比,神经质得分较高的抑郁患者的这些区域的体积较小,控制了年龄和性别。这些区域包括额极、内侧眶额皮质和左侧眶额回。此外,我们发现,非神经质的抑郁患者 T1 加权图像上的非白质低信号体积较高(可能与脑血管疾病有关),而神经质的抑郁患者则较低。我们发现神经质得分较低的抑郁患者的非白质低信号体积较高,这与“血管性抑郁”的先前文献一致。相比之下,神经质得分较高的患者的额体积小于神经质得分较低的抑郁患者和未抑郁患者,这突出了额皮质回路在伴有共病神经质的老年抑郁患者亚组中的重要性。总之,这些结果表明,神经质和非神经质的老年抑郁患者群体存在不同的神经机制,并且多种生物学病理学可能导致 LLD 的不同临床表现。