• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种压力疼痛阈值测量可靠性的新指标。

A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement.

机构信息

School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Essex, UK.

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6
PMID:33767329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7994550/
Abstract

The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ([Formula: see text] = 222.28 N), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ([Formula: see text] = 4.83 N). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols.

摘要

会话间内组内相关系数(ICC)是一种常用于压力疼痛阈值(PPT)测量的可靠性的度量方法,且具有重要的临床意义。然而,目前的研究在计算会话间 ICC 时并未考虑到重复测量之间的变异性,尽管在不同的会话中进行的 PPT 测量也必须意味着不同的重复次数。本研究的主要目的是评估和报告一种新的 PPT 测量可靠性度量方法:会话间-重复 ICC。一名评估者使用压力测痛计在 20 名健康成年人的双侧腰部进行了两次测试,共记录了 10 次 PPT 测量的重复次数。使用线性混合模型计算方差分量,并构建 ICC;特别是会话间 ICC 和会话间-重复 ICC。在总方差的 70.1%中,最大变异性源是个体之间([公式:见文本] = 222.28 N),而最小变异性源(总方差的 1.5%)是会话之间([公式:见文本] = 4.83 N)。得出的会话间和会话间-重复 ICC 分别为 0.88(95%CI:0.77 至 0.94)和 0.73(95%CI:0.53 至 0.84)。会话间-重复 ICC 提供了比会话间 ICC 更保守的可靠性估计,差异的幅度具有临床意义。量化个体变异性的来源可以使 ICC 的构建反映出个体的测试方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/675a99f3d778/41598_2021_86344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/56441ddff1d0/41598_2021_86344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/4f18de76532f/41598_2021_86344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/675a99f3d778/41598_2021_86344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/56441ddff1d0/41598_2021_86344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/4f18de76532f/41598_2021_86344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde6/7994550/675a99f3d778/41598_2021_86344_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement.一种压力疼痛阈值测量可靠性的新指标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6.
2
Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm across three anatomical sites.在三个解剖部位评估条件性疼痛调制范式的可靠性。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):283-296. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0080.
3
Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.一次测试是否足以获得无症状个体下背部良好的压痛阈值可靠性?一项重测研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 11;11(8):e0160866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160866. eCollection 2016.
4
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold assessment in stroke patients.脑卒中患者压痛阈评估的组内信度和组间信度。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Aug;58(4):549-557. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07378-6. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
Pain pressure threshold algometry in knee osteoarthritis: intra- and inter-rater reliability.膝骨关节炎疼痛压力阈值测量法:评估者内及评估者间的可靠性
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;39(3):615-622. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2023929. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Test-retest reliability of subjective supra-threshold scaling of multiple pressure-pain sensations among healthy individuals: a study using hydraulic pressure algometry.健康个体中多种压力性疼痛感觉主观阈上缩放的重测信度:一项使用液压压力计的研究
Somatosens Mot Res. 2018 Sep-Dec;35(3-4):153-161. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2018.1505608. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Relative and absolute test-retest reliabilities of pressure pain threshold in patients with knee osteoarthritis.膝骨关节炎患者压力痛阈的相对及绝对重测信度
Scand J Pain. 2018 Apr 25;18(2):229-236. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0017.
8
Within-Session Test-Retest Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold and Mechanical Temporal Summation in Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下背痛患者压力疼痛阈和机械时间总和的 session 内复测信度。
Clin J Pain. 2023 May 1;39(5):217-225. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001106.
9
Pressure Pain Threshold in Subjects With Piriformis Syndrome: Test-Retest, Intrarater, and Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectible Changes.梨状肌综合征患者的压痛阈:测试-重测、组内和组间可靠性以及最小可检测变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May;101(5):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.194. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
10
Within-session test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and mechanical temporal summation in healthy subjects.健康受试者压力痛阈和机械性时间总和的组内重测信度
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0245278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245278. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Gua Sha therapy on thoracolumbar fascia thickness and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.刮痧疗法对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者胸腰筋膜厚度及临床疗效的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44233. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044233.
2
Immediate Changes in the Elasticity of Tissue and the Pain Pressure Threshold in Cesarean Scar Tissue After a Vacuum Intervention: An Open Clinical Trial.真空干预后剖宫产瘢痕组织的组织弹性和疼痛压力阈值的即时变化:一项开放性临床试验。
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):557. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030557.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Controlled manual loading of body tissues: towards the next generation of pressure algometer.受控手动加载人体组织:迈向新一代压力触觉仪。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Oct 5;28(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00340-7.
2
Pressure pain threshold and temporal summation in adults with episodic and persistent low back pain trajectories: a secondary analysis at baseline and after lumbar manipulation or sham.有发作性和持续性腰痛轨迹的成年人的压痛阈和时间总和:基线时和腰椎手法或假治疗后进行的二次分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 12;28(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00326-5.
3
Pressure Pain Threshold in Subjects With Piriformis Syndrome: Test-Retest, Intrarater, and Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectible Changes.
Mechanical and thermal thresholds before and after application of a conditioning stimulus in healthy Göttingen Minipigs.
健康哥廷根迷你猪应用条件刺激前后的机械和热阈值。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0309604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309604. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of force pain thresholds to ensure collision safety in worker-robot collaborative operations.评估力痛阈值以确保工人-机器人协作操作中的碰撞安全。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Apr 8;11:1374999. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1374999. eCollection 2024.
5
Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial.脊骨疗法治疗慢性原发性下腰痛患者的机制:一项机制随机安慰剂对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e065999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065999.
6
Inter-individual variability in mechanical pain sensation in patients with cervicogenic headache: an explorative study.颈源性头痛患者机械性疼痛感觉的个体间变异性:一项探索性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 30;12(1):20635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25326-8.
7
Pressure pain thresholds in a real-world chiropractic setting: topography, changes after treatment, and clinical relevance?真实世界的整脊环境中的压痛阈值:分布、治疗后变化及临床意义?
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 12;30(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00436-2.
8
A Statistical Model to Determine Biomechanical Limits for Physically Safe Interactions With Collaborative Robots.一种用于确定与协作机器人进行物理安全交互的生物力学极限的统计模型。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Feb 3;8:667818. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.667818. eCollection 2021.
梨状肌综合征患者的压痛阈:测试-重测、组内和组间可靠性以及最小可检测变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May;101(5):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.194. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
4
Intraclass correlation - A discussion and demonstration of basic features.组内相关系数 - 基本特征的讨论与演示。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219854. eCollection 2019.
5
Assessing Endogenous Pain Inhibition: Test-Retest Reliability of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Local and Remote Body Parts After Aerobic Cycling.评估内源性疼痛抑制:有氧运动后局部和远程身体部位的运动诱导镇痛的测试-重测信度。
Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2272-2282. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz131.
6
Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometer.测量头晕患者颈部的压力疼痛阈值——压力痛觉计的可靠性
Physiother Res Int. 2018 Oct;23(4):e1736. doi: 10.1002/pri.1736. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
7
Pressure pain thresholds: Subject factors and the meaning of peak pressures.压力疼痛阈值:受试者因素与峰值压力的意义。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Jan;23(1):167-182. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1298. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Experimental pressure-pain assessments: Test-retest reliability, convergence and dimensionality.实验性压力疼痛评估:重测信度、收敛性和维度
Scand J Pain. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.10.003.
9
Reliability of pressure pain threshold testing in healthy pain free young adults.健康无痛年轻成年人压力痛阈测试的可靠性
Scand J Pain. 2015 Oct 1;9(1):38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.05.004.
10
How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.定量感觉测试测量结果随时间的稳定性如何?关于健康志愿者10周可靠性及结果一致性的报告。
J Pain Res. 2017 Aug 29;10:2067-2078. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S137391. eCollection 2017.