精神障碍的跨国结构:来自世界精神卫生调查的结果。

The cross-national structure of mental disorders: results from the World Mental Health Surveys.

机构信息

Developmental Psychology,Department of Psychology,Rijksuniversiteit Groningen,Groningen,Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry,Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation,University Medical Center Groningen,Groningen,Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2018 Sep;48(12):2073-2084. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003610. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The patterns of comorbidity among mental disorders have led researchers to model the underlying structure of psychopathology. While studies have suggested a structure including internalizing and externalizing disorders, less is known with regard to the cross-national stability of this model. Moreover, little data are available on the placement of eating disorders, bipolar disorder and psychotic experiences (PEs) in this structure.

METHODS

We evaluated the structure of mental disorders with data from the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, including 15 lifetime mental disorders and six PEs. Respondents (n = 5478-15 499) were included from 10 high-, middle- and lower middle-income countries across the world aged 18 years or older. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used to evaluate and compare the fit of different factor structures to the lifetime disorder data. Measurement invariance was evaluated with multigroup CFA (MG-CFA).

RESULTS

A second-order model with internalizing and externalizing factors and fear and distress subfactors best described the structure of common mental disorders. MG-CFA showed that this model was stable across countries. Of the uncommon disorders, bipolar disorder and eating disorder were best grouped with the internalizing factor, and PEs with a separate factor.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that cross-national patterns of lifetime common mental-disorder comorbidity can be explained with a second-order underlying structure that is stable across countries and can be extended to also cover less common mental disorders.

摘要

背景

精神障碍的共病模式促使研究人员对精神病理学的潜在结构进行建模。虽然研究表明存在包括内在和外在障碍的结构,但对于该模型在跨国层面的稳定性知之甚少。此外,关于饮食障碍、双相情感障碍和精神病性体验(PEs)在该结构中的位置,数据也很少。

方法

我们使用来自世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈的资料评估了精神障碍的结构,包括 15 种终身精神障碍和 6 种 PEs。纳入了来自全球 10 个高、中、中低收入国家的 18 岁及以上的 5478-15499 名受访者。使用验证性因素分析(CFA)评估和比较不同因素结构对终身障碍数据的拟合程度。使用多群组 CFA(MG-CFA)评估测量不变性。

结果

一个包含内在和外在因素以及恐惧和痛苦亚因素的二阶模型最能描述常见精神障碍的结构。MG-CFA 表明,该模型在各国之间具有稳定性。在罕见障碍中,双相情感障碍和饮食障碍与内在因素最相关,PEs 则与一个单独的因素相关。

结论

这些结果表明,跨国层面的终身常见精神障碍共病模式可以用一个稳定的二阶潜在结构来解释,该结构可以扩展到也包括较少见的精神障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索