Suppr超能文献

高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的比较有效性和安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yi, Geng Jinsong, Bao Haini, Dong Jiancheng, Shi Jianwei, Xi Qinghua

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Ministry of Education Virtual Research Center of Evidence-Based Medicine at Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 9;11:600800. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.600800. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors among premenopausal women. High- intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging non-invasive intervention which uses the high-intensity ultrasound waves from ultrasound probes to focus on the targeted fibroids. However, the efficacy of HIFU in comparison with that of other common treatment types in clinical procedure remains unclear. To investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of HIFU with other techniques which have been widely used in clinical settings. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database, and three Chinese academic databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the rate of re-intervention, and the GRADE approach was used to interpret the findings. About 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. HIFU was associated with an increased risk of re-intervention rate in comparison with myomectomy (MYO) [pooled odds ratio (OR): 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-8.9]. The results favored HIFU in comparison with hysterectomy (HYS) on the change of follicle-stimulating hormone [pooled mean difference (MD): -7.95, 95% CI: -8.92-6.98), luteinizing hormone (MD: -4.38, 95% CI: -5.17-3.59), and estradiol (pooled MD: 43.82, 95% CI: 36.92-50.72)]. HIFU had a shorter duration of hospital stay in comparison with MYO (pooled MD: -4.70, 95% CI: -7.46-1.94, < 0.01). It had a lower incidence of fever (pooled OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06-0.39, < 0.01) and a lower incidence of major adverse events (pooled OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00-0.30, < 0.01) in comparison with HYS. High-intensity focused ultrasound may help maintain feminity and shorten the duration of hospital stay. High-quality clinical studies with a large sample size, a long-term follow-up, and the newest HIFU treatment protocol for evaluating the re-intervention rate are suggested to be carried out. Clinical decision should be based on the specific situation of the patients and individual values.

摘要

子宫肌瘤是绝经前女性常见的良性肿瘤。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是一种新兴的非侵入性干预手段,它利用超声探头发出的高强度超声波聚焦于目标肌瘤。然而,在临床过程中,HIFU与其他常见治疗方式相比的疗效仍不明确。为了研究HIFU与其他已在临床广泛应用的技术相比的有效性和安全性,我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央登记库、PubMed、EMBASE、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引、科学引文索引、ProQuest护理学与健康相关数据库以及三个中文学术数据库,包括随机对照试验(RCT)、非RCT和队列研究。主要结局是再次干预率,并采用GRADE方法解释研究结果。约18项研究符合纳入标准。与子宫肌瘤切除术(MYO)相比,HIFU导致再次干预率升高的风险增加[合并比值比(OR):4.05,95%置信区间(CI):1.82 - 8.9]。在促卵泡生成素变化方面,与子宫切除术(HYS)相比,结果更倾向于HIFU[合并均数差(MD): - 7.95,95% CI: - 8.92 - 6.98]、促黄体生成素(MD: - 4.38,95% CI: - 5.17 - 3.59)和雌二醇(合并MD:43.82,95% CI:36.92 - 50.72)。与MYO相比,HIFU的住院时间更短(合并MD: - 4.70,95% CI: - 7.46 - 1.94,P < 0.01)。与HYS相比,其发热发生率更低(合并OR:0.15,95% CI:0.06 - 0.39,P < 0.01),主要不良事件发生率也更低(合并OR:0.04,95% CI:0.00 - 0.30,P < 0.01)。高强度聚焦超声可能有助于维持女性特征并缩短住院时间。建议开展大样本量、长期随访以及采用最新HIFU治疗方案以评估再次干预率的高质量临床研究。临床决策应基于患者的具体情况和个人价值观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验