Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neuropsychology & Cognitive Health, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jan 12;77(1):71-83. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab051.
Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, is characterized by episodic memory impairment. Recent evidence has shown inhibitory control deficits in aMCI, but the extent of these deficits across inhibitory domains (i.e., response inhibition and interference control) and aMCI subtypes (i.e., single vs multiple domain) remains unclear. Few studies have included reaction time intraindividual variability (RT IIV) in these efforts. The aim of this study was to compare response inhibition and interference control between aMCI subtypes using measures of accuracy, mean RT, and RT IIV.
We report data from 34 individuals with single-domain aMCI (sdaMCI, 66-86 years), 20 individuals with multiple-domain aMCI (mdaMCI, 68-88 years), and 52 healthy controls (HC, 64-88 years) who completed tasks of response inhibition (Go-NoGo) and interference control (Flanker). Group differences in accuracy, mean RT, and RT IIV were examined for both tasks.
Individuals with mdaMCI had higher RT IIV than the other groups on both tasks. In RT IIV, we observed an interference control deficit in mdaMCI and sdaMCI relative to healthy controls, a finding not observed through accuracy or mean RT.
RT IIV may detect subtle differences in inhibition deficits between aMCI subtypes that may not be evident with conventional behavioral measures. Findings support the supplementary use of RT IIV when assessing early executive function deficits.
遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)是阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症的前驱阶段,其特征是情景记忆障碍。最近的证据表明 aMCI 存在抑制控制缺陷,但这些缺陷在抑制领域(即反应抑制和干扰控制)和 aMCI 亚型(即单一或多个领域)中的程度仍不清楚。很少有研究在这些研究中包含反应时个体内变异性(RT IIV)。本研究旨在通过准确性、平均 RT 和 RT IIV 来比较 aMCI 亚型的反应抑制和干扰控制。
我们报告了来自 34 名单域 aMCI(sdaMCI,66-86 岁)、20 名多域 aMCI(mdaMCI,68-88 岁)和 52 名健康对照者(HC,64-88 岁)的数据集,他们完成了反应抑制(Go-NoGo)和干扰控制(Flanker)任务。我们检查了两个任务中准确性、平均 RT 和 RT IIV 的组间差异。
在两个任务中,mdaMCI 个体的 RT IIV 均高于其他组。在 RT IIV 中,我们观察到 mdaMCI 和 sdaMCI 相对于健康对照组存在干扰控制缺陷,而这一发现无法通过准确性或平均 RT 来观察到。
RT IIV 可能检测到 aMCI 亚型之间抑制缺陷的细微差异,而这些差异可能无法通过传统的行为测量来察觉。这些发现支持在评估早期执行功能缺陷时补充使用 RT IIV。