School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Nov;20(11):7657-7674. doi: 10.1002/alz.14227. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Brain network dynamics have been extensively explored in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI); however, differences in single- and multiple-domain aMCI (SD-aMCI and MD-aMCI) remain unclear.
Using multicenter datasets, coactivation patterns (CAPs) were constructed and compared among normal control (NC), SD-aMCI, MD-aMCI, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients based on individual high-order cognitive network (HOCN) and primary sensory network (PSN) parcellations. Correlations between spatiotemporal characteristics and neuropsychological scores were analyzed.
Compared to NC, SD-aMCI showed temporal alterations in HOCN-dominant CAPs, while MD-aMCI showed alterations in PSN-dominant CAPs. In addition, transitions from SD-aMCI to AD may involve PSN, while MD-aMCI to AD involves both PSN and HOCN. Results were generally consistent across datasets from Chinese and White populations.
The HOCN and PSN are distinctively involved in aMCI subtypes and in the transformation between aMCI subtypes and AD, highlighting the necessity of aMCI subtype classification in AD studies.
Individual functional network parcellations and coactivation pattern (CAP) analysis were performed to characterize spatiotemporal differences between single- and multiple-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment (SD-aMCI and MD-aMCI), and between distinct aMCI subtypes and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The analysis of multicenter datasets converged on four pairs of recurrent CAPs, including primary sensory networks (PSN)-dominant CAPs, high-order cognitive networks (HOCN)-dominant CAPs, and PSN-HOCN-interacting CAPs. The HOCN and PSN are distinctively involved in aMCI subtypes and in the transformation between distinct aMCI subtypes and AD.
脑网络动力学已在遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者中得到广泛研究;然而,单域和多域 aMCI(SD-aMCI 和 MD-aMCI)之间的差异尚不清楚。
使用多中心数据集,基于个体高阶认知网络(HOCN)和初级感觉网络(PSN)分区,构建并比较正常对照组(NC)、SD-aMCI、MD-aMCI 和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的共激活模式(CAPs)。分析时空特征与神经心理学评分之间的相关性。
与 NC 相比,SD-aMCI 的 HOCN 主导的 CAP 存在时间变化,而 MD-aMCI 的 PSN 主导的 CAP 存在变化。此外,从 SD-aMCI 向 AD 的转变可能涉及 PSN,而 MD-aMCI 向 AD 则涉及 PSN 和 HOCN。结果在来自中国和白人人群的数据集之间基本一致。
HOCN 和 PSN 分别参与了 aMCI 亚型,以及 aMCI 亚型与 AD 之间的转化,突出了在 AD 研究中对 aMCI 亚型进行分类的必要性。
对个体功能网络分区和共激活模式(CAP)进行分析,以描绘单域和多域遗忘型轻度认知障碍(SD-aMCI 和 MD-aMCI)以及不同 aMCI 亚型与阿尔茨海默病(AD)之间的时空差异。对多中心数据集的分析得出了四对反复出现的 CAP,包括初级感觉网络(PSN)主导的 CAP、高阶认知网络(HOCN)主导的 CAP 以及 PSN-HOCN 相互作用的 CAP。HOCN 和 PSN 分别参与了 aMCI 亚型以及不同 aMCI 亚型与 AD 之间的转化。