• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会隔离措施与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 血清阳性率之间的关联：荷兰全国范围内的基于人群的研究。

Associations Between Measures of Social Distancing and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seropositivity: A Nationwide Population-based Study in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Surveillance, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Immunology of Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 16;73(12):2318-2321. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab264.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciab264
PMID:33772265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083720/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This large, nationwide, population-based, seroepidemiological study provides evidence of the effectiveness of physical distancing (>1.5 m) and indoor group size reductions in reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Additionally, young adults may play an important role in viral spread, contrary to children up until age 12 years with whom close contact is permitted.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NTR8473.

摘要

未标注

本项大规模、全国性、基于人群的血清流行病学研究提供了证据，表明保持 1.5 米以上的身体距离和减少室内群体规模能够有效减少严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型感染。此外，与直至 12 岁的儿童可以密切接触不同，年轻成年人可能在病毒传播中发挥重要作用。

临床试验注册

NTR8473。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e9/8677553/dec5f460969f/ciab264f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e9/8677553/dec5f460969f/ciab264f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e9/8677553/dec5f460969f/ciab264f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations Between Measures of Social Distancing and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seropositivity: A Nationwide Population-based Study in the Netherlands.社会隔离措施与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 血清阳性率之间的关联：荷兰全国范围内的基于人群的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 16;73(12):2318-2321. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab264.
2
Association of a Public Health Campaign About Coronavirus Disease 2019 Promoted by News Media and a Social Influencer With Self-reported Personal Hygiene and Physical Distancing in the Netherlands.新闻媒体和社交媒体影响者联合开展的关于 2019 冠状病毒病的公共卫生宣传活动与荷兰人自我报告的个人卫生和保持身体距离行为之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014323. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14323.
3
Rapid Real-time Tracking of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions and Their Association With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Positivity: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Pulse Study.快速实时追踪非药物干预措施及其与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2（SARS-CoV-2）阳性的关联：2019 年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行脉搏研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1822-e1829. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1313.
4
Social Distancing Alters the Clinical Course of COVID-19 in Young Adults: A Comparative Cohort Study.社交隔离改变了年轻人 COVID-19 的临床病程：一项比较队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):598-603. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa889.
5
Effects of Social Distancing Measures during the First Epidemic Wave of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Infection, Greece.严重急性呼吸系统综合征疫情第一波期间实施社会疏离措施的效果，希腊。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):452-462. doi: 10.3201/eid2702.203412.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Distancing Interventions to Delay or Flatten the Epidemic Curve of Coronavirus Disease.评估社交隔离干预措施在延迟或拉平冠状病毒病流行曲线方面的效果。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;26(8):1740-1748. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201093. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
7
Contact tracing, use of surgical masks, hand hygiene and social distancing represent a bundle of effective measures to control SARS-CoV-2 spreading among healthcare workers in a paediatric hospital.接触者追踪、使用外科口罩、手部卫生和保持社交距离是控制 SARS-CoV-2 在儿科医院医护人员中传播的一系列有效措施。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Sep 15;62(3):E592-E597. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.3.1719. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016-17, April 2020 and June 2020.针对 COVID-19 的身体距离措施对接触和混合模式的影响：重复的横断面调查，荷兰，2016-17 年，2020 年 4 月和 2020 年 6 月。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb;26(8). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994.
9
Social Distancing, Mask Use, and Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Brazil, April-June 2020.社交距离、口罩使用与 2020 年 4 月至 6 月期间巴西严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的传播。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;27(8):2135-2143. doi: 10.3201/eid2708.204757. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Shifting Patterns of Respiratory Virus Activity Following Social Distancing Measures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in South Korea.社交隔离措施对韩国 2019 年冠状病毒病呼吸道病毒活动模式的影响
J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 1;224(11):1900-1906. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab231.

引用本文的文献

1
Flexible and scalable participatory syndromic and virological surveillance for respiratory infections: Our experiences in The Netherlands.用于呼吸道感染的灵活且可扩展的参与式症状监测和病毒学监测：我们在荷兰的经验。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0303230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303230. eCollection 2025.
2
Quantifying the Health Burden of COVID-19 Using Individual Estimates of Years of Life Lost Based on Population-wide Administrative Level Data.利用基于全人群行政层面数据的个体生命年损失估计值来量化新冠疫情的健康负担
Epidemiology. 2025 Jul 1;36(4):520-530. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001854. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016-17, April 2020 and June 2020.针对 COVID-19 的身体距离措施对接触和混合模式的影响：重复的横断面调查，荷兰，2016-17 年，2020 年 4 月和 2020 年 6 月。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb;26(8). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994.
2
Nationwide seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and identification of risk factors in the general population of the Netherlands during the first epidemic wave.荷兰第一波疫情期间全国范围内严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）的血清流行率及普通人群风险因素的识别
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov 28;75(6):489-95. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215678.
3
Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys, 2016 to 2017 and 2020 to 2023.
新冠疫情前后荷兰的接触行为：来自 2016 年至 2017 年和 2020 年至 2023 年接触调查的证据。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Oct;29(43). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.43.2400143.
4
Determinants of Systemic SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody Responses to Infection and to Vaccination: A Secondary Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trial Data.感染和接种疫苗后系统性SARS-CoV-2特异性抗体反应的决定因素：随机对照试验数据的二次分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;12(6):691. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12060691.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Trends in the Netherlands in the Variant of Concern Era: Input for Future Response.关注变异株时代下荷兰的 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行趋势：为未来的应对提供依据。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Jun;18(6):e13312. doi: 10.1111/irv.13312.
6
Health-related quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of restrictive measures using data from two Dutch population-based cohort studies.新冠大流行期间的健康相关生活质量：来自两项荷兰基于人群的队列研究的限制性措施影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0300324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300324. eCollection 2024.
7
Projecting COVID-19 intensive care admissions for policy advice, the Netherlands, February 2020 to January 2021.预测 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 1 月期间荷兰的 COVID-19 重症监护入院人数，为政策建议提供参考。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Mar;29(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.10.2300336.
8
Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study.在一项前瞻性家庭研究中估计 SARS-CoV-2 的引入和传播率。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 29;20(1):e1011832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011832. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers in Dutch hospitals after the 2020 first wave: a multicentre cross-sectional study with prospective follow-up.荷兰医院医护人员在 2020 年第一波疫情后 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率：一项前瞻性随访的多中心横断面研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Nov 29;12(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01324-x.
10
Correcting for Antibody Waning in Cumulative Incidence Estimation From Sequential Serosurveys.从连续血清学调查中校正累积发病率估计的抗体衰减。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 May 7;193(5):777-786. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad226.
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
全球范围内 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):331-340. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.020. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
4
Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children and Adolescents Compared With Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童和青少年与成年人相比对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的易感性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;175(2):143-156. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4573.
5
SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody Detection for Seroepidemiology: A Multiplex Analysis Approach Accounting for Accurate Seroprevalence.用于血清流行病学的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体检测：一种考虑准确血清流行率的多重分析方法。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 1;222(9):1452-1461. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa479.
6
[The role of children in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2].[儿童在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2传播中的作用]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Jun 3;164:D5140.
7
Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study.一线医护人员和普通社区人群 COVID-19 发病风险：前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):e475-e483. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Assessing the extent of SARS-CoV-2 circulation through serological studies.通过血清学研究评估严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）的传播程度。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1171-1172. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1018-x.
9
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study.西班牙 2020 年人群血清流行病学研究（ENE-COVID）：全国范围内基于人群的血清流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31483-5. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics.年龄相关因素对 COVID-19 疫情传播和防控的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1205-1211. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9. Epub 2020 Jun 16.