• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?非人类灵长类动物如何表现出对其他动物对物体隐藏位置的意识?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104658. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Do non-human primates really represent others' ignorance? A test of the awareness relations hypothesis.非人类灵长类动物真的代表了他人的无知吗?对意识关系假说的检验。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?猴子对他人的知识了解多少?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
4
The origins of belief representation: monkeys fail to automatically represent others' beliefs.信念表征的起源:猴子无法自动表征他人的信念。
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
5
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
6
Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions?12.5个月大的婴儿在解读他人行为时会考虑他人能看到什么物体吗?
Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):489-512. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
Do young rhesus macaques know what others see?: A comparative developmental perspective.幼年恒河猴知道其他个体看到了什么吗?:一项比较发展心理学视角的研究。
Am J Primatol. 2020 Nov;82(11):e23054. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23054. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Monkeys represent others' knowledge but not their beliefs.猴子代表他人的知识而非其信念。
Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1406-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01085.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Macaque species with varying social tolerance show no differences in understanding what other agents perceive.不同社会容忍度的猕猴物种在理解其他个体感知方面没有差异。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jul;24(4):877-888. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01485-5. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
A decade of theory of mind research on Cayo Santiago: Insights into rhesus macaque social cognition.对圣地亚哥岛恒河猴进行的十年心理理论研究:对恒河猴社会认知的洞察
Am J Primatol. 2016 Jan;78(1):106-16. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22362. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Autism attenuates the perception of the mind-body divide.自闭症削弱了身心二分的感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2211628119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211628119. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Macaque species with varying social tolerance show no differences in understanding what other agents perceive.不同社会容忍度的猕猴物种在理解其他个体感知方面没有差异。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jul;24(4):877-888. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01485-5. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Primates Pass Dynamically Social Anticipatory-Looking False-Belief Tests.灵长类动物通过动态社交预期性注视错误信念测试。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):777-778. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Advancing Gaze-Based Research on Primate Theory of Mind.推进基于注视的灵长类心理理论研究。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):778-779. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Do Non-Human Primates Really Represent Others' Beliefs?非人类灵长类动物真的能代表他人的信仰吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):594-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Macaques Exhibit Implicit Gaze Bias Anticipating Others' False-Belief-Driven Actions via Medial Prefrontal Cortex.猕猴通过内侧前额叶皮质表现出对他人基于错误信念驱动行为的内隐注视偏见。
Cell Rep. 2020 Mar 31;30(13):4433-4444.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.013.
6
Great apes use self-experience to anticipate an agent's action in a false-belief test.类人猿通过自我体验来预测代理人在错误信念测试中的行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):20904-20909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910095116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Do young rhesus macaques know what others see?: A comparative developmental perspective.幼年恒河猴知道其他个体看到了什么吗?:一项比较发展心理学视角的研究。
Am J Primatol. 2020 Nov;82(11):e23054. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23054. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions.动物心理理论:当前和未来的方向。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;10(6):e1503. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1503. Epub 2019 May 17.
9
Do non-human primates really represent others' ignorance? A test of the awareness relations hypothesis.非人类灵长类动物真的代表了他人的无知吗?对意识关系假说的检验。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?猴子对他人的知识了解多少?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

非人类灵长类动物如何表现出对其他动物对物体隐藏位置的意识?

How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?

机构信息

School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104658. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104658
PMID:33773422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8154671/
Abstract

Although non-human primates (NHPs) generally appear to predict how knowledgeable agents use knowledge to guide their behavior, the cognitive mechanisms that enable this remain poorly understood. We assessed the conditions under which NHPs' representations of an agent's awareness break down. Free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) watched as an agent observed a target object being hidden in one of two boxes. While the agent could no longer see the boxes, the box containing the object flipped open and the object either changed in size/shape (Experiment 1) or color (Experiment 2). Monkeys looked longer when the agent searched for the object incorrectly rather than correctly following the color change (a non-geometric manipulation), but not the size/shape change (a geometric manipulation). Even though the agent maintained knowledge of the object's location in both cases, monkeys no longer expected the agent to search correctly after it had been geometrically (but not non-geometrically) manipulated. Experiment 3 confirmed that monkeys were sensitive to the color manipulation used in Experiment 2, making it unlikely that a failure to perceive the color manipulation accounted for our findings. Our results show that NHPs do not always expect that knowledgeable agents will act on their knowledge to obtain their goals, consistent with heuristic-based accounts of how NHPs represent others' mental states. These findings also suggest that geometric changes that occur outside the agent's perceptual access may disrupt attribution of awareness more so than non-geometric changes.

摘要

虽然非人类灵长类动物(NHPs)通常似乎可以预测有知识的代理人如何利用知识来指导他们的行为,但使这种情况发生的认知机制仍未得到很好的理解。我们评估了 NHPs 对代理人意识的代表崩溃的条件。自由放养的恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)观察到一个代理人观察一个目标物体被藏在两个盒子中的一个里面。当代理人无法再看到盒子时,装有物体的盒子翻转打开,物体的大小/形状(实验 1)或颜色(实验 2)发生变化。当代理人错误地寻找物体而不是正确地跟随颜色变化(非几何操作)时,猴子会看更长时间,但不是大小/形状变化(几何操作)。即使在两种情况下代理人都保持对物体位置的了解,猴子也不再期望代理人在经过几何(但不是非几何)操作后正确地搜索。实验 3 证实猴子对实验 2 中使用的颜色操作敏感,这使得不可能由于未能感知颜色操作而导致我们的发现。我们的结果表明,NHPs 并不总是期望有知识的代理人会根据他们的知识行事以实现他们的目标,这与 NHPs 代表他人心理状态的启发式解释一致。这些发现还表明,代理人感知范围之外发生的几何变化可能比非几何变化更能破坏意识的归因。