Suppr超能文献

非人类灵长类动物如何表现出对其他动物对物体隐藏位置的意识?

How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?

机构信息

School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104658. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Abstract

Although non-human primates (NHPs) generally appear to predict how knowledgeable agents use knowledge to guide their behavior, the cognitive mechanisms that enable this remain poorly understood. We assessed the conditions under which NHPs' representations of an agent's awareness break down. Free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) watched as an agent observed a target object being hidden in one of two boxes. While the agent could no longer see the boxes, the box containing the object flipped open and the object either changed in size/shape (Experiment 1) or color (Experiment 2). Monkeys looked longer when the agent searched for the object incorrectly rather than correctly following the color change (a non-geometric manipulation), but not the size/shape change (a geometric manipulation). Even though the agent maintained knowledge of the object's location in both cases, monkeys no longer expected the agent to search correctly after it had been geometrically (but not non-geometrically) manipulated. Experiment 3 confirmed that monkeys were sensitive to the color manipulation used in Experiment 2, making it unlikely that a failure to perceive the color manipulation accounted for our findings. Our results show that NHPs do not always expect that knowledgeable agents will act on their knowledge to obtain their goals, consistent with heuristic-based accounts of how NHPs represent others' mental states. These findings also suggest that geometric changes that occur outside the agent's perceptual access may disrupt attribution of awareness more so than non-geometric changes.

摘要

虽然非人类灵长类动物(NHPs)通常似乎可以预测有知识的代理人如何利用知识来指导他们的行为,但使这种情况发生的认知机制仍未得到很好的理解。我们评估了 NHPs 对代理人意识的代表崩溃的条件。自由放养的恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)观察到一个代理人观察一个目标物体被藏在两个盒子中的一个里面。当代理人无法再看到盒子时,装有物体的盒子翻转打开,物体的大小/形状(实验 1)或颜色(实验 2)发生变化。当代理人错误地寻找物体而不是正确地跟随颜色变化(非几何操作)时,猴子会看更长时间,但不是大小/形状变化(几何操作)。即使在两种情况下代理人都保持对物体位置的了解,猴子也不再期望代理人在经过几何(但不是非几何)操作后正确地搜索。实验 3 证实猴子对实验 2 中使用的颜色操作敏感,这使得不可能由于未能感知颜色操作而导致我们的发现。我们的结果表明,NHPs 并不总是期望有知识的代理人会根据他们的知识行事以实现他们的目标,这与 NHPs 代表他人心理状态的启发式解释一致。这些发现还表明,代理人感知范围之外发生的几何变化可能比非几何变化更能破坏意识的归因。

相似文献

3
What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?猴子对他人的知识了解多少?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
5
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
8
Monkeys represent others' knowledge but not their beliefs.猴子代表他人的知识而非其信念。
Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1406-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01085.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Autism attenuates the perception of the mind-body divide.自闭症削弱了身心二分的感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2211628119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211628119. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

3
Advancing Gaze-Based Research on Primate Theory of Mind.推进基于注视的灵长类心理理论研究。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):778-779. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Do Non-Human Primates Really Represent Others' Beliefs?非人类灵长类动物真的能代表他人的信仰吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):594-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions.动物心理理论:当前和未来的方向。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;10(6):e1503. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1503. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?猴子对他人的知识了解多少?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验