Mistree Dinsha, Loyalka Prashant, Fairlie Robert, Bhuradia Ashutosh, Angrish Manyu, Lin Jason, Karoshi Amar, Yen Sara J, Mistri Jamsheed, Bayat Vafa
Stanford University, Law School, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stanford University, Graduate School of Education and Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Encina Hall East Wing Room 413, 616 Serra St., Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113846. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113846. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Seeking ways to encourage broad compliance with health guidelines during the pandemic, especially among youth, we test two hypotheses pertaining to the optimal design of instructional interventions for improving COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. We randomly assigned 8376 lower-middle income youth in urban India to three treatments: a concentrated and targeted fact-based, instructional intervention; a longer instructional intervention that provided the same facts along with underlying scientific concepts; and a control. Relative to existing efforts, we find that both instructional interventions increased COVID-19-related knowledge immediately after intervention. Relative to the shorter fact-based intervention, the longer intervention resulted in sustained improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behavior. Instead of reducing attention and comprehension by youth, the longer scientific based treatment appears to have increased understanding and retention of the material. The findings are instrumental to understanding the design of instruction and communication in affecting compliance during this and future pandemics.
为寻求在疫情期间鼓励广泛遵守健康指南的方法,特别是在年轻人中,我们检验了两个与改善新冠病毒相关知识、态度和行为的指导性干预措施的最佳设计有关的假设。我们将印度城市地区的8376名中低收入青年随机分为三组进行治疗:一种集中且有针对性的基于事实的指导性干预;一种更长的指导性干预,它在提供相同事实的同时还包含了基础科学概念;以及一个对照组。相对于现有措施,我们发现两种指导性干预措施在干预后都立即增加了与新冠病毒相关的知识。相对于较短的基于事实的干预措施,较长的干预措施在知识、态度和自我报告行为方面带来了持续的改善。基于科学的较长治疗措施似乎并未减少年轻人的注意力和理解力,反而增加了他们对材料的理解和记忆。这些发现有助于理解在此次及未来疫情期间影响人们遵守规定方面的指导和沟通设计。