ICU Department, Inserm CIC-1435 and UMR-1092, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30995-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Staphylococcus aureus remains a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia, with little change in incidence over the past 15 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the α toxin, in reducing the incidence of S aureus pneumonia in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who are on mechanical ventilation.
We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 pilot trial at 31 hospitals in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible patients were in the ICU, aged ≥18 years, were intubated and on mechanical ventilation, were positive for S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract, as assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of endotracheal aspirate, and had not been diagnosed with new-onset pneumonia. Patients were excluded if they had confirmed or suspected acute ongoing staphylococcal disease; had received antibiotics for S aureus infection for more than 48 h within 72 h of randomisation; had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of 6 or higher; had an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of 25 or higher with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of more than 5, or an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of at least 30 with a GCS score of 5 or less; had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 9 or higher; or had active pulmonary disease that would impair the ability to diagnose pneumonia. Colonised patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), by use of an interactive voice or web response system, to receive either a single intravenous infusion of suvratoxumab 2000 mg, suvratoxumab 5000 mg, or placebo. Randomisation was done in blocks of size four, stratified by country and by whether patients had received systemic antibiotics for S aureus infection. Patients, investigators, and study staff involved in the treatment or clinical evaluation of patients were masked to patient assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of S aureus pneumonia at 30 days, as determined by a masked independent endpoint adjudication committee, in all patients who received their assigned treatment (modified intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Primary safety endpoints were the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at 30 days, 90 days, and 190 days after treatment, and the incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and new-onset chronic disease at 190 days after treatment. All primary safety endpoints were assessed in the modified ITT population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02296320) and the EudraCT database (2014-001097-34).
Between Oct 10, 2014, and April 1, 2018, 767 patients were screened, of whom 213 patients with confirmed S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract were randomly assigned to the suvratoxumab 2000 mg group (n=15), the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (n=96), or the placebo group (n=102). Two patients in the placebo group did not receive treatment after randomisation because their clinical conditions changed and they no longer met the eligibility criteria for dosing. As adjudicated by the data monitoring committee at an interim analysis, the suvratoxumab 2000 mg group was discontinued on the basis of predefined pharmacokinetic criteria. At 30 days after treatment, 17 (18%) of 96 patients in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group and 26 (26%) of 100 patients in the placebo group had developed S aureus pneumonia (relative risk reduction 31·9% [90% CI -7·5 to 56·8], p=0·17). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at 30 days were similar between the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (87 [91%]) and the placebo group (90 [90%]). The incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events at 30 days were also similar between the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (36 [38%]) and the placebo group (32 [32%]). No significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups at 90 days (89 [93%] in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group vs 92 [92%] in the placebo group) and at 190 days (93 [94%] vs 93 [93%]) was observed. 40 (40%) patients in the placebo group and 50 (52%) in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group had a serious adverse event at 190 days. In the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group, one (1%) patient reported at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event related to treatment, two (2%) patients reported an adverse event of special interest, and two (2%) reported a new-onset chronic disease.
In patients in the ICU receiving mechanical ventilation with qPCR-confirmed S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract, the incidence of S aureus pneumonia at 30 days was not significantly lower following treatment with 5000 mg suvratoxumab than with placebo. Despite these negative results, monoclonal antibodies still represent one promising therapeutic option to reduce antibiotic consumption that require further exploration and studies.
AstraZeneca, with support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking.
金黄色葡萄球菌仍然是呼吸机相关性肺炎的常见病因,在过去 15 年中,其发病率几乎没有变化。我们旨在评估靶向α毒素的单克隆抗体 suvratoxumab 降低机械通气的重症监护病房(ICU)中金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎发生率的疗效。
我们在比利时、捷克共和国、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、葡萄牙、西班牙和瑞士的 31 家医院进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、2 期试点试验。符合条件的患者为 ICU 患者,年龄≥18 岁,气管插管并接受机械通气,下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植阳性,通过气管内抽吸物的定量 PCR(qPCR)分析评估,且未诊断为新发肺炎。如果患者有确诊或疑似急性持续性金黄色葡萄球菌疾病;在随机分组后 72 小时内,在 48 小时内接受过金黄色葡萄球菌感染的抗生素治疗;临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)为 6 分或更高;急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分(APACHE II)为 25 分或更高,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 5 分或更高,或急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分至少为 30 分,GCS 评分为 5 分或更低;序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为 9 分或更高;或患有可能损害诊断肺炎能力的活动性肺部疾病,则将被排除。定植患者通过交互式语音或网络响应系统以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配接受单剂量静脉注射 suvratoxumab 2000mg、suvratoxumab 5000mg 或安慰剂。随机分组以 4 个大小的块进行,按国家和患者是否接受过金黄色葡萄球菌感染的全身抗生素治疗进行分层。接受治疗或对患者进行临床评估的患者、研究者和研究人员对患者的分配情况均设盲。主要疗效终点为所有接受指定治疗的患者(修改后的意向治疗[ITT]人群)在 30 天时金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的发生率,由盲法独立终点评估委员会确定。主要安全性终点为治疗后 30 天、90 天和 190 天时治疗出现的不良事件发生率,以及治疗后 190 天时治疗出现的严重不良事件、关注的不良事件和新发慢性疾病的发生率。所有主要安全性终点均在修改后的 ITT 人群中评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02296320)和 EudraCT 数据库(2014-001097-34)中注册。
2014 年 10 月 10 日至 2018 年 4 月 1 日,共筛选了 767 名患者,其中 213 名患者的下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植得到确认,他们被随机分配到 suvratoxumab 2000mg 组(n=15)、suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(n=96)或安慰剂组(n=102)。安慰剂组中的 2 名患者在随机分组后由于临床状况改变且不再符合给药标准而未接受治疗。根据数据监测委员会在中期分析时的建议,基于预设的药代动力学标准,停止了 suvratoxumab 2000mg 组的治疗。治疗后 30 天时,suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中 96 名患者中有 17 名(18%)和安慰剂组中 100 名患者中有 26 名(26%)发生金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎(相对风险降低 31.9%[90%CI-7.5 至 56.8],p=0.17)。suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(91%)和安慰剂组(90%)在治疗后 30 天时治疗出现的不良事件发生率相似。suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(38%)和安慰剂组(32%)在治疗后 30 天时治疗出现的严重不良事件发生率也相似。在治疗后 90 天(suvratoxumab 5000mg 组 89[93%]vs 安慰剂组 92[92%])和 190 天(suvratoxumab 5000mg 组 93[94%]vs 安慰剂组 93[93%])时,两组之间治疗出现的不良事件发生率也没有显著差异。安慰剂组中有 40 名(40%)患者和 suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中有 50 名(52%)患者在 190 天时发生了严重不良事件。在 suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中,1 名(1%)患者报告了至少 1 例与治疗相关的严重不良事件,2 例(2%)患者报告了关注的不良事件,2 例(2%)患者报告了新发慢性疾病。
在接受机械通气并通过 qPCR 确认下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植的 ICU 患者中,与安慰剂相比,接受 5000mg suvratoxumab 治疗后 30 天金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的发生率没有显著降低。尽管有这些阴性结果,但单克隆抗体仍然是一种有前途的降低抗生素使用的治疗选择,需要进一步探索和研究。
阿斯利康,得到了创新药物倡议联合事业的支持。