• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Suvratoxumab 预防金黄色葡萄球菌呼吸机相关性肺炎(SAATELLITE)的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、2 期先导试验。

Efficacy and safety of suvratoxumab for prevention of Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia (SAATELLITE): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 pilot trial.

机构信息

ICU Department, Inserm CIC-1435 and UMR-1092, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.

BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30995-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30995-6
PMID:33894131
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus remains a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia, with little change in incidence over the past 15 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the α toxin, in reducing the incidence of S aureus pneumonia in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who are on mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 pilot trial at 31 hospitals in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible patients were in the ICU, aged ≥18 years, were intubated and on mechanical ventilation, were positive for S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract, as assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of endotracheal aspirate, and had not been diagnosed with new-onset pneumonia. Patients were excluded if they had confirmed or suspected acute ongoing staphylococcal disease; had received antibiotics for S aureus infection for more than 48 h within 72 h of randomisation; had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of 6 or higher; had an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of 25 or higher with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of more than 5, or an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of at least 30 with a GCS score of 5 or less; had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 9 or higher; or had active pulmonary disease that would impair the ability to diagnose pneumonia. Colonised patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), by use of an interactive voice or web response system, to receive either a single intravenous infusion of suvratoxumab 2000 mg, suvratoxumab 5000 mg, or placebo. Randomisation was done in blocks of size four, stratified by country and by whether patients had received systemic antibiotics for S aureus infection. Patients, investigators, and study staff involved in the treatment or clinical evaluation of patients were masked to patient assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of S aureus pneumonia at 30 days, as determined by a masked independent endpoint adjudication committee, in all patients who received their assigned treatment (modified intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Primary safety endpoints were the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at 30 days, 90 days, and 190 days after treatment, and the incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and new-onset chronic disease at 190 days after treatment. All primary safety endpoints were assessed in the modified ITT population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02296320) and the EudraCT database (2014-001097-34).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 10, 2014, and April 1, 2018, 767 patients were screened, of whom 213 patients with confirmed S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract were randomly assigned to the suvratoxumab 2000 mg group (n=15), the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (n=96), or the placebo group (n=102). Two patients in the placebo group did not receive treatment after randomisation because their clinical conditions changed and they no longer met the eligibility criteria for dosing. As adjudicated by the data monitoring committee at an interim analysis, the suvratoxumab 2000 mg group was discontinued on the basis of predefined pharmacokinetic criteria. At 30 days after treatment, 17 (18%) of 96 patients in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group and 26 (26%) of 100 patients in the placebo group had developed S aureus pneumonia (relative risk reduction 31·9% [90% CI -7·5 to 56·8], p=0·17). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at 30 days were similar between the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (87 [91%]) and the placebo group (90 [90%]). The incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events at 30 days were also similar between the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group (36 [38%]) and the placebo group (32 [32%]). No significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups at 90 days (89 [93%] in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group vs 92 [92%] in the placebo group) and at 190 days (93 [94%] vs 93 [93%]) was observed. 40 (40%) patients in the placebo group and 50 (52%) in the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group had a serious adverse event at 190 days. In the suvratoxumab 5000 mg group, one (1%) patient reported at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event related to treatment, two (2%) patients reported an adverse event of special interest, and two (2%) reported a new-onset chronic disease.

INTERPRETATION

In patients in the ICU receiving mechanical ventilation with qPCR-confirmed S aureus colonisation of the lower respiratory tract, the incidence of S aureus pneumonia at 30 days was not significantly lower following treatment with 5000 mg suvratoxumab than with placebo. Despite these negative results, monoclonal antibodies still represent one promising therapeutic option to reduce antibiotic consumption that require further exploration and studies.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca, with support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking.

摘要

背景

金黄色葡萄球菌仍然是呼吸机相关性肺炎的常见病因,在过去 15 年中,其发病率几乎没有变化。我们旨在评估靶向α毒素的单克隆抗体 suvratoxumab 降低机械通气的重症监护病房(ICU)中金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎发生率的疗效。

方法

我们在比利时、捷克共和国、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、葡萄牙、西班牙和瑞士的 31 家医院进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、2 期试点试验。符合条件的患者为 ICU 患者,年龄≥18 岁,气管插管并接受机械通气,下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植阳性,通过气管内抽吸物的定量 PCR(qPCR)分析评估,且未诊断为新发肺炎。如果患者有确诊或疑似急性持续性金黄色葡萄球菌疾病;在随机分组后 72 小时内,在 48 小时内接受过金黄色葡萄球菌感染的抗生素治疗;临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)为 6 分或更高;急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分(APACHE II)为 25 分或更高,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 5 分或更高,或急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分至少为 30 分,GCS 评分为 5 分或更低;序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为 9 分或更高;或患有可能损害诊断肺炎能力的活动性肺部疾病,则将被排除。定植患者通过交互式语音或网络响应系统以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配接受单剂量静脉注射 suvratoxumab 2000mg、suvratoxumab 5000mg 或安慰剂。随机分组以 4 个大小的块进行,按国家和患者是否接受过金黄色葡萄球菌感染的全身抗生素治疗进行分层。接受治疗或对患者进行临床评估的患者、研究者和研究人员对患者的分配情况均设盲。主要疗效终点为所有接受指定治疗的患者(修改后的意向治疗[ITT]人群)在 30 天时金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的发生率,由盲法独立终点评估委员会确定。主要安全性终点为治疗后 30 天、90 天和 190 天时治疗出现的不良事件发生率,以及治疗后 190 天时治疗出现的严重不良事件、关注的不良事件和新发慢性疾病的发生率。所有主要安全性终点均在修改后的 ITT 人群中评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02296320)和 EudraCT 数据库(2014-001097-34)中注册。

结果

2014 年 10 月 10 日至 2018 年 4 月 1 日,共筛选了 767 名患者,其中 213 名患者的下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植得到确认,他们被随机分配到 suvratoxumab 2000mg 组(n=15)、suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(n=96)或安慰剂组(n=102)。安慰剂组中的 2 名患者在随机分组后由于临床状况改变且不再符合给药标准而未接受治疗。根据数据监测委员会在中期分析时的建议,基于预设的药代动力学标准,停止了 suvratoxumab 2000mg 组的治疗。治疗后 30 天时,suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中 96 名患者中有 17 名(18%)和安慰剂组中 100 名患者中有 26 名(26%)发生金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎(相对风险降低 31.9%[90%CI-7.5 至 56.8],p=0.17)。suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(91%)和安慰剂组(90%)在治疗后 30 天时治疗出现的不良事件发生率相似。suvratoxumab 5000mg 组(38%)和安慰剂组(32%)在治疗后 30 天时治疗出现的严重不良事件发生率也相似。在治疗后 90 天(suvratoxumab 5000mg 组 89[93%]vs 安慰剂组 92[92%])和 190 天(suvratoxumab 5000mg 组 93[94%]vs 安慰剂组 93[93%])时,两组之间治疗出现的不良事件发生率也没有显著差异。安慰剂组中有 40 名(40%)患者和 suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中有 50 名(52%)患者在 190 天时发生了严重不良事件。在 suvratoxumab 5000mg 组中,1 名(1%)患者报告了至少 1 例与治疗相关的严重不良事件,2 例(2%)患者报告了关注的不良事件,2 例(2%)患者报告了新发慢性疾病。

解释

在接受机械通气并通过 qPCR 确认下呼吸道金黄色葡萄球菌定植的 ICU 患者中,与安慰剂相比,接受 5000mg suvratoxumab 治疗后 30 天金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的发生率没有显著降低。尽管有这些阴性结果,但单克隆抗体仍然是一种有前途的降低抗生素使用的治疗选择,需要进一步探索和研究。

资金

阿斯利康,得到了创新药物倡议联合事业的支持。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of suvratoxumab for prevention of Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia (SAATELLITE): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 pilot trial.Suvratoxumab 预防金黄色葡萄球菌呼吸机相关性肺炎(SAATELLITE)的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、2 期先导试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30995-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Pirfenidone in patients with unclassifiable progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.吡非尼酮治疗无法分类的进行性纤维化间质性肺疾病患者:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):147-157. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30341-8. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
3
Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial.加巴喷丁治疗失败的偏头痛预防性药物患者(CONQUER)的安全性和疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3b 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Oct;19(10):814-825. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
CAL02, a novel antitoxin liposomal agent, in severe pneumococcal pneumonia: a first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.CAL02,一种新型抗毒素脂质体药物,在严重肺炎链球菌肺炎中的应用:一项首次人体、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;19(6):620-630. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30805-3. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Inhaled amikacin adjunctive to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia (INHALE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, superiority trial.吸入性阿米卡星辅助治疗机械通气革兰氏阴性菌肺炎患者静脉标准治疗抗生素(INHALE):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、3 期优效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):330-340. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30574-2. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Ceftriaxone to prevent early ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acute brain injury: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked superiority trial.头孢曲松预防急性脑损伤患者早期呼吸机相关性肺炎:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、评估者设盲的优效性试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 May;12(5):375-385. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00471-X. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
Safety and efficacy of GABA α5 antagonist S44819 in patients with ischaemic stroke: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.GABAα5 拮抗剂 S44819 治疗缺血性脑卒中患者的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Mar;19(3):226-233. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30004-1.
8
Discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in non-critical care wards (PTC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.非重症监护病房中接受社区获得性肺炎治疗的患者,在 3 天后停止使用β-内酰胺治疗(PTC):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1195-1203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00313-5.
9
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂作为完全切除的IIB期或IIC期黑色素瘤辅助治疗(KEYNOTE-716):一项随机、双盲、3期试验
Lancet. 2022 Apr 30;399(10336):1718-1729. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00562-1. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
10
Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.头孢地尔与大剂量延长输注美罗培南治疗革兰阴性菌医院获得性肺炎(APEKS-NP):一项随机、双盲、3期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30731-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Methicillin-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: tolerance, immune evasion and treatment.耐甲氧西林和敏感金黄色葡萄球菌:耐受性、免疫逃避与治疗
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01226-2.
2
Reduced efficacy of an anti-toxin vaccine from senescence-driven attenuation of toxin virulence.衰老导致毒素毒力减弱,抗毒素疫苗效力降低。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 14:2025.08.14.670416. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.14.670416.
3
Exploring Human Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Critical Bacteria: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.
探索人类对针对关键细菌的单克隆抗体的使用:一项临床试验的范围综述
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2.
4
Associations Between Candida and , and Species as Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Isolates in 84 Cohorts of ICU Patients.念珠菌与[未提及的两种菌]以及84个重症监护病房患者队列中作为呼吸机相关性肺炎分离株的[具体菌名]之间的关联。
Microorganisms. 2025 May 22;13(6):1181. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061181.
5
The Next Frontier: Unveiling Novel Approaches for Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.下一个前沿领域:揭示对抗多重耐药细菌的新方法。
Pharm Res. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s11095-025-03871-x.
6
Antibiotics re-booted-time to kick back against drug resistance.抗生素迎来新契机——是时候反击耐药性了。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025 May 30;3(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s44259-025-00096-1.
7
Staphylococcal toxin PVL ruptures model membranes under acidic conditions through interactions with cardiolipin and phosphatidic acid.葡萄球菌毒素PVL在酸性条件下通过与心磷脂和磷脂酸相互作用使模型膜破裂。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Apr 15;23(4):e3003080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003080. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Beyond antibiotics: exploring multifaceted approaches to combat bacterial resistance in the modern era: a comprehensive review.超越抗生素:探索现代对抗细菌耐药性的多方面方法:全面综述
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Mar 18;15:1493915. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1493915. eCollection 2025.
9
in Inflammation and Pain: Update on Pathologic Mechanisms.《炎症与疼痛:病理机制的最新进展》
Pathogens. 2025 Feb 12;14(2):185. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14020185.
10
Antibacterials with Novel Chemical Scaffolds in Clinical Development.处于临床开发阶段的具有新型化学骨架的抗菌药物。
Drugs. 2025 Mar;85(3):293-323. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02137-x. Epub 2025 Jan 23.