Suppr超能文献

转移性集合管癌、肾髓质癌和透明细胞肾细胞癌的综合基因组分析

Comprehensive genomic profiling of metastatic collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Bratslavsky Gennady, Gleicher Stephanie, Jacob Joseph M, Sanford Thomas H, Shapiro Oleg, Bourboulia Dimitra, Gay Laurie M, Andrea Elvin Julie, Vergilio Jo-Anne, Suh James, Ramkissoon Shakti, Severson Eric Allan, Killian Jonathan Keith, Schrock Alexa Betzig, Chung Jon H, Miller Vincent A, Mollapour Mehdi, Ross Jeffrey S

机构信息

Upstate Medical University, Syracuse NY.

Upstate Medical University, Syracuse NY.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2021 Jun;39(6):367.e1-367.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Unlike clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) are rare tumors that progress rapidly and appear resistant to current systemic therapies. We queried comprehensive genomic profiling to uncover opportunities for targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

DNA was extracted from 40 microns of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen from relapsed, mCDC (n = 46), mRMC (n = 24), and refractory and metastatic (m) mCCRCC (n = 626). Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed, and Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were calculated. We analyzed all classes of genomic alterations.

RESULTS

mCDC had 1.7 versus 2.7 genomic alterations/tumor in mCCRCC ( = 0.04). Mutations in VHL (P < 0.0001) and TSC1 (P = 0.04) were more frequent in mCCRCC. SMARCB1 (P < 0.0001), NF2 (P = 0.0007), RB1 (P = 0.02) and RET (P = 0.0003) alterations were more frequent in mCDC versus mCCRCC. No VHL alterations in mRMC and mCDC were identified. SMARCB1 genomic alterations were significantly more frequent in mRMC than mCDC (P = 0.0002), but were the most common alterations in both subtypes. Mutations to EGFR, RET, NF2, and TSC2 were more frequently identified in mCDC versus mRMC. The median TMB and MSI-High status was low with <1% of mCCRC, mCDC, and mRMC having ≥ 20 mut/Mb.

CONCLUSION

Genomic alteration patterns in mCDC and mRMC differ significantly from mCCRCC. Targeted therapies for mCDC and mRMC appear limited with rare opportunities to target alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase and MTOR pathways. Similarly, TMB and absence of MSI-High status in mCDC and mRMC suggest resistance to immunotherapies.

摘要

引言与目的

与透明细胞肾细胞癌(CCRCC)不同,集合管癌(CDC)和肾髓质癌(RMC)是罕见肿瘤,进展迅速且似乎对当前的全身治疗有抗性。我们通过全面基因组分析来寻找靶向治疗和免疫治疗的机会。

材料与方法

从复发的转移性CDC(mCDC,n = 46)、转移性RMC(mRMC,n = 24)以及难治性和转移性(m)mCCRCC(n = 626)的40微米福尔马林固定石蜡包埋标本中提取DNA。进行全面基因组分析,并计算肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)和微卫星不稳定性(MSI)。我们分析了所有类型的基因组改变。

结果

mCDC中每个肿瘤的基因组改变数为1.7个,而mCCRCC为2.7个(P = 0.04)。VHL(P < 0.0001)和TSC1(P = 0.04)的突变在mCCRCC中更常见。SMARCB1(P < 0.0001)、NF2(P = 0.0007)、RB1(P = 0.02)和RET(P = 0.0003)的改变在mCDC中比mCCRCC更常见。在mRMC和mCDC中未发现VHL改变。SMARCB1基因组改变在mRMC中比mCDC显著更常见(P = 0.0002),但在两种亚型中都是最常见的改变。与mRMC相比,在mCDC中更频繁地鉴定出EGFR、RET、NF2和TSC2的突变。mCCRC、mCDC和mRMC中TMB中位数和MSI-High状态较低,≥20个突变/Mb的比例<1%。

结论

mCDC和mRMC的基因组改变模式与mCCRCC有显著差异。mCDC和mRMC的靶向治疗似乎有限,靶向受体酪氨酸激酶和MTOR途径改变的机会很少。同样,mCDC和mRMC中TMB以及缺乏MSI-High状态表明对免疫治疗有抗性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验