• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛评分解读对患者疼痛感知的影响:一项前瞻性研究。

Influence of interpretation of pain scores on patients' perception of pain: A prospective study.

作者信息

Bakshi Sumitra G, Rathod Akanksha, Salunkhe Supriya

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):216-220. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_130_21. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

DOI:10.4103/ija.IJA_130_21
PMID:33776112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7989498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Assessment of pain using pain scales is essential. In the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to score their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10 (10- worst pain). This requires some abstract thinking by the patient, also the pain scores (PS) may not essentially communicate the patients' need for more analgesia. We planned a study to evaluate the change in patients' self-assessed PS after understanding clinical interpretation of the NRS.

METHODS

This prospective study was registered after approval from our hospital ethics board. Sample size estimated for the trial was 360 patients. All postoperative patients were recruited after informed consent. Patients having prolonged stay in Intensive Care Unit (more than 48 h), or those who underwent emergency surgeries were excluded. During Acute Pain Service (APS) rounds, patients were asked to rate their PS on the NRS. This was followed by a briefing about the clinical interpretation of the scale, and the patients were asked to re score their pain using the same scale. The change in pain severity was compared using Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Following explanation, a change in severity was seen for PS at rest [ (9, N- 360) = 441, < 0.001] and at movement [X (9, N- 360) = 508, < 0.001]. Overall, a change in PS severity was seen in 162 patients (45%). A decrease and an increase in the severity of pain was seen in 119 and 41 patients respectively.

CONCLUSION

Explaining the clinical interpretation of PS on a NRS does lead to a change in patients' self-assessed PS.

摘要

背景与目的

使用疼痛量表评估疼痛至关重要。在数字评分量表(NRS)中,要求患者在0至10的量表上对其疼痛强度进行评分(10为最严重疼痛)。这需要患者进行一些抽象思维,而且疼痛评分(PS)可能无法确切传达患者对更多镇痛的需求。我们计划开展一项研究,以评估患者在理解NRS的临床解读后自我评估的PS变化。

方法

这项前瞻性研究在获得我院伦理委员会批准后进行注册。该试验估计的样本量为360名患者。所有术后患者在获得知情同意后被纳入。排除在重症监护病房停留时间延长(超过48小时)的患者或接受急诊手术的患者。在急性疼痛服务(APS)查房期间,要求患者在NRS上对其PS进行评分。随后对该量表的临床解读进行简要说明,并要求患者使用同一量表重新对其疼痛进行评分。使用卡方检验比较疼痛严重程度的变化。

结果

经过解释后,静息时PS的严重程度发生了变化[卡方值(9,N = 360)= 441,P < 0.001],活动时也发生了变化[卡方值(9,N = 360)= 508,P < 0.001]。总体而言,162名患者(45%)的PS严重程度发生了变化。疼痛严重程度降低和增加的患者分别有119名和41名。

结论

解释NRS上PS的临床解读确实会导致患者自我评估的PS发生变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d4/7989498/1048577d2fc2/IJA-65-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d4/7989498/1048577d2fc2/IJA-65-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d4/7989498/1048577d2fc2/IJA-65-216-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of interpretation of pain scores on patients' perception of pain: A prospective study.疼痛评分解读对患者疼痛感知的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):216-220. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_130_21. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
2
Validation of a New "Objective Pain Score" Vs. "Numeric Rating Scale" For the Evaluation of Acute Pain: A Comparative Study.一种新的“客观疼痛评分”与“数字评分量表”在急性疼痛评估中的有效性验证:一项比较研究。
Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan 17;6(1):e32101. doi: 10.5812/aapm.32101. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: a cross-sectional study.基于数字评分的术后疼痛评估对患者和专业人员来说并不相同:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
4
A prospective randomized study to analyze the efficacy of balanced pre-emptive analgesia in spine surgery.一项前瞻性随机研究,旨在分析平衡预预防性镇痛在脊柱手术中的疗效。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):569-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Patients' self-reported nausea: Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale and of a daily summary of repeated Numerical Rating Scale scores.患者自述恶心:数字评定量表和重复数字评定量表评分每日摘要的验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):959-968. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14705. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
What adult patients prefer for reporting their pain levels, and frequency of reassessment when in the emergency department.成年患者在急诊科报告疼痛程度时更喜欢采用何种方式,以及重新评估的频率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;73:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
7
Psychometric properties of the itch numeric rating scale, skin pain numeric rating scale, and atopic dermatitis sleep scale in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.中重度特应性皮炎成人患者中瘙痒数字评分量表、皮肤疼痛数字评分量表和特应性皮炎睡眠量表的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Oct 23;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01877-8.
8
Predicting postoperative pain by using preoperative pain threshold in response to electrical stimulus in women undergoing gynaecological cancer surgery - Single-arm, prospective, observational study.通过术前对电刺激的疼痛阈值预测妇科癌症手术女性患者的术后疼痛——单臂前瞻性观察研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;67(6):497-502. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_503_22. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
9
Analgesia nociception index: evaluation as a new parameter for acute postoperative pain.镇痛伤害指数:评估作为急性术后疼痛的一个新参数。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):627-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet111. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
A comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain.三种自我报告疼痛量表在急性疼痛成人患者中的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.039. Epub 2014 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the role of nursing interventions in enhanced recovery after surgery for minimally invasive spine surgery: a retrospective analysis.评估护理干预在微创脊柱手术术后加速康复中的作用:一项回顾性分析。
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 19;12:1519135. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1519135. eCollection 2025.
2
A Review of Federal and Statewide Guidelines and Their Effects on Orthopedics.联邦及全州指南及其对骨科影响的综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 16;15(9):e45374. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45374. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Proximal versus distal adductor canal catheters for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluations of single-item pain-intensity measures in cancer patients: Numeric rating scale vs. verbal rating scale.癌症患者单项疼痛强度测量的比较评估:数字评定量表与言语评定量表。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2945-2952. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15341. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
Validation of a New "Objective Pain Score" Vs. "Numeric Rating Scale" For the Evaluation of Acute Pain: A Comparative Study.一种新的“客观疼痛评分”与“数字评分量表”在急性疼痛评估中的有效性验证:一项比较研究。
Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan 17;6(1):e32101. doi: 10.5812/aapm.32101. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
Postoperative patients' perspectives on rating pain: A qualitative study.
近端与远端收肌管导管用于全膝关节置换术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;71(6):834-848. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02552-w. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FI) block for hip surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经周围筋膜腔(FI)阻滞在髋关节手术中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):794-809. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Translation and validation of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for evaluating the effectiveness of acute pain services in the Indian population.用于评估印度人群急性疼痛服务有效性的修订版美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R)的翻译与验证
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Feb;67(2):219-221. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_474_22. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Does past/current pain change pain experience? Comparing self-reports and pupillary responses.过去/当前的疼痛会改变疼痛体验吗?比较自我报告与瞳孔反应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1094903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1094903. eCollection 2023.
7
Functional outcomes and quality of recovery after anaesthesia and surgery - Outreaching towards protracted goals.麻醉与手术后的功能结局及恢复质量——迈向长期目标
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 May;66(Suppl 3):S133-S136. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_356_22. Epub 2022 May 17.
8
The increasing trend of observational studies in clinical research: Have we forgotten and started defying the hierarchy?临床研究中观察性研究的增长趋势:我们是否已经遗忘并开始违背等级制度?
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):186-190. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_176_21. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
术后患者对疼痛评分的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:260-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
4
A comparison of three self-report pain scales in adults with acute pain.三种自我报告疼痛量表在急性疼痛成人患者中的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.039. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
5
The Relation Between Patients' NRS Pain Scores and Their Desire for Additional Opioids after Surgery.患者数字评分法疼痛评分与术后额外使用阿片类药物意愿之间的关系。
Pain Pract. 2015 Sep;15(7):604-9. doi: 10.1111/papr.12217. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the use of pain scales in postoperative pain assessments.医疗保健专业人员对疼痛量表在术后疼痛评估中的使用看法。
Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments.数字评分量表:患者对其在术后疼痛评估中使用的看法。
Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
8
How simple can it get? Measuring pain with NRS items or binary items.有多简单?用 NRS 项目或二进制项目来测量疼痛。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Mar;29(3):224-32. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824c5d7a.
9
Utility of numerical and visual analog scales for evaluating the post-operative pain in rural patients.数字评分量表和视觉模拟评分量表在评估农村患者术后疼痛中的效用。
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;56(6):553-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.104573.
10
The diagnostic value of the numeric pain rating scale in older postoperative patients.数字疼痛评分量表在老年术后患者中的诊断价值。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3018-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04288.x.