Sokol Rebeccah L, Heinze Justin, Doan Jessica, Normand Meg, Grodzinski Alison, Pomerantz Naomi, Scott Briana A, Gaswirth Maura, Zimmerman Marc
School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
J Sch Violence. 2021;20(2):241-260. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2021.1879098. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
This systematic review synthesizes research on school-based crisis intervention protocols, descriptions, and evaluations. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 60 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. We found an overwhelming lack of evaluation studies (n=3), suggesting that interventions are being administered post-crises without evaluation. The most frequently named crisis intervention model was the Prevent/Prepare, Reaffirm, Evaluate, Provide and Respond, and Examine (PREPaRE) model (n=6). All evaluation studies in the sample were observational, and most adopted qualitative methods of evaluation. Future studies are needed to evaluate crisis interventions to measure the fidelity, reliability, and effectiveness of such interventions.
本系统综述综合了关于校本危机干预方案、描述及评估的研究。我们进行了全面的文献检索,有60项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。我们发现评估研究严重匮乏(n = 3),这表明干预措施在危机发生后实施,却未进行评估。最常被提及的危机干预模式是预防/准备、重申、评估、提供与应对以及检查(PREPaRE)模式(n = 6)。样本中的所有评估研究均为观察性研究,且大多采用定性评估方法。未来需要开展研究来评估危机干预措施,以衡量此类干预措施的保真度、可靠性和有效性。