Marsh Jenny L, Bentil Sarah A
The Bentil Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 12;12:626393. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626393. eCollection 2021.
Cavitation has gained popularity in recent years as a potential mechanism of blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI). This review presents the most prominent debates on cavitation; how bubbles can form or exist within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain vasculature, potential mechanisms of cellular, and tissue level damage following the collapse of bubbles in response to local pressure fluctuations, and a survey of experimental and computational models used to address cavitation research questions. Due to the broad and varied nature of cavitation research, this review attempts to provide a necessary synthesis of cavitation findings relevant to bTBI, and identifies key areas where additional work is required. Fundamental questions about the viability and likelihood of CSF cavitation during blast remain, despite a variety of research regarding potential injury pathways. Much of the existing literature on bTBI evaluates cavitation based off its plausibility, while more rigorous evaluation of its likelihood becomes increasingly necessary. This review assesses the validity of some of the common assumptions in cavitation research, as well as highlighting outstanding questions that are essential in future work.
近年来,空化作为爆炸所致创伤性脑损伤(bTBI)的一种潜在机制而受到关注。本综述介绍了关于空化的最突出争论;气泡如何在脑脊液(CSF)和脑血管系统中形成或存在,气泡在局部压力波动作用下破裂后细胞和组织水平损伤的潜在机制,以及用于解决空化研究问题的实验和计算模型综述。由于空化研究广泛且多样,本综述试图对与bTBI相关的空化研究结果进行必要的综合,并确定需要进一步开展工作的关键领域。尽管对潜在损伤途径进行了各种研究,但关于爆炸期间脑脊液空化的可行性和可能性的基本问题仍然存在。现有关于bTBI的许多文献根据其合理性评估空化,而对其可能性进行更严格的评估变得越来越必要。本综述评估了空化研究中一些常见假设的有效性,并强调了未来工作中至关重要的未解决问题。