Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland (N.S., S.D.H., J.H.); Breast Unit (Y.M., S.D.H.) and Department of Pathology (E.H.), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland; and MRI Unit, The Francis Crick Institute, London, England (B.S.).
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019 Sep 27;1(1):e190008. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2019190008. eCollection 2019 Sep.
To determine whether q-space imaging (QSI), an advanced diffusion-weighted MRI method, provides a higher effect gradient to assess tumor cellularity than existing diffusion imaging methods, and fidelity to cellularity obtained from histologic analysis.
In this prospective study, diffusion-weighted images were acquired from 20 whole-breast tumors freshly excised from participants (age range, 35-78 years) by using a clinical 3.0-T MRI unit. Median and skewness values were extracted from the histogram distributions obtained from QSI, monoexponential model, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and stretched exponential model (SEM). The skewness from QSI and other diffusion models was compared by using paired tests and relative effect gradient obtained from correlating skewness values.
The skewness obtained from QSI (mean, 1.34 ± 0.77 [standard deviation]) was significantly higher than the skewness from monoexponential fitting approach (mean, 1.09 ± 0.67; = .015), SEM (mean, 1.07 ± 0.70; = .014), and DKI (mean, 0.97 ± 0.63; = .004). QSI yielded a higher effect gradient in skewness (percentage increase) compared with monoexponential fitting approach (0.26 of 0.74; 35.1%), SEM (0.26 of 0.74; 35.1%), and DKI (0.37 of 0.63; 58.7%). The skewness and median from QSI were significantly correlated with the skewness (ρ = -0.468; = .038) and median (ρ = -0.513; = .021) of cellularity from histologic analysis.
QSI yields a higher effect gradient in assessing breast tumor cellularity than existing diffusion methods, and fidelity to underlying histologic structure. Breast, MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging, MR-Imaging, Pathology, Tissue Characterization, Tumor ResponsePublished under a CC BY 4.0 license.
确定 q 空间成像(QSI)这种先进的扩散加权 MRI 方法是否比现有的扩散成像方法能提供更高的评估肿瘤细胞密度的效果梯度,并与组织学分析得到的细胞密度保持一致。
在这项前瞻性研究中,使用临床 3.0T MRI 仪从 20 例刚切除的全乳肿瘤患者(年龄 35-78 岁)中获取扩散加权图像。从 QSI、单指数模型、扩散峰度成像(DKI)和拉伸指数模型(SEM)获得的直方图分布中提取中位数和偏度值。使用配对 t 检验比较 QSI 和其他扩散模型的偏度,并通过相关偏度值获得相对效果梯度。
QSI 获得的偏度(平均值 1.34 ± 0.77[标准差])明显高于单指数拟合方法(平均值 1.09 ± 0.67; =.015)、SEM(平均值 1.07 ± 0.70; =.014)和 DKI(平均值 0.97 ± 0.63; =.004)。与单指数拟合方法(0.74 的 0.26,即 35.1%)、SEM(0.74 的 0.26,即 35.1%)和 DKI(0.63 的 0.37,即 58.7%)相比,QSI 在偏度方面的效果梯度更高。QSI 的偏度和中位数与组织学分析得到的偏度(ρ=-0.468; =.038)和中位数(ρ=-0.513; =.021)显著相关。
QSI 在评估乳腺肿瘤细胞密度方面的效果梯度高于现有的扩散方法,与组织学结构具有一致性。乳腺、MR 扩散加权成像、MR 成像、病理学、组织特征、肿瘤反应。发表于 CC BY 4.0 许可下。