The Copenhagen Affective Disorder research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;75(3):186-193. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1831063. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
The association between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and objective measures of physical activity has never been evaluated in participants with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder (BD). Our aim was to compare IPAQ-SF to objective measures in participants with newly diagnosed BD, their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR), and healthy control individuals (HC) in groups combined and stratified by group.
Physical activity measurements were collected on 20 participants with newly diagnosed BD, 20 of their UR, and 20 HC using individually calibrated combined acceleration and heart rate sensing (Actiheart) for seven days. IPAQ-SF was self-completed at baseline. Correlation between measurements from the two methods was examined with Spearman rank correlation coefficient and agreement levels examined with modified Bland-Altman plots.
Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) from IPAQ-SF was weakly but significantly positively correlated with physical activity estimates measured using acceleration and heart rate in groups combined (Actiheart PAEE) (ρ= 0.301, 0.02). Correlations for each group were positive, but only in UR were it statistically significant (BD: = 0.18, UR: = 0.007, HC: = 0.84). Self-reported PAEE and moderate-intensity were markedly underestimated [PAEE in all participants combined: 62.7 (Actiheart) vs. 24.3 kJ/day/kg (IPAQ-SF), < 0.001], while vigorous-intensity was overestimated. Bland-Altman plots indicated proportional bias.
These results suggest that the use of the IPAQ-SF to monitor levels of physical activity in participants with newly diagnosed BD, in a psychiatric clinical setting, should be used with caution and consideration.
国际体力活动问卷短表(IPAQ-SF)与新诊断的双相情感障碍(BD)患者的体力活动的客观测量之间的关联从未被评估过。我们的目的是比较 IPAQ-SF 与新诊断的 BD 患者、未受影响的一级亲属(UR)和健康对照个体(HC)的客观测量值,这些个体在组合和分层的组中进行比较。
使用个体校准的加速度和心率感应(Actiheart)对 20 名新诊断的 BD 患者、20 名 UR 和 20 名 HC 进行为期七天的身体活动测量。在基线时使用 IPAQ-SF 进行自我完成。使用 Spearman 等级相关系数检查两种方法的测量值之间的相关性,并使用修改后的 Bland-Altman 图检查一致性水平。
IPAQ-SF 的体力活动能量消耗(PAEE)与使用加速度和心率测量的活动量估计值在组合组中呈弱但显著正相关(Actiheart PAEE)(ρ=0.301,0.02)。每个组的相关性都是正的,但只有在 UR 中才具有统计学意义(BD: = 0.18,UR: = 0.007,HC: = 0.84)。自我报告的 PAEE 和中等强度明显被低估[所有参与者组合的 PAEE:62.7(Actiheart)vs. 24.3 kJ/day/kg(IPAQ-SF), < 0.001],而剧烈强度则被高估。Bland-Altman 图表明存在比例偏差。
这些结果表明,在精神病临床环境中,使用 IPAQ-SF 监测新诊断的 BD 患者的体力活动水平应谨慎使用。