Suppr超能文献

IPAQ-SF与其他两份身体活动问卷在青少年男性中与加速度计的比较。

Comparison of IPAQ-SF and Two Other Physical Activity Questionnaires with Accelerometer in Adolescent Boys.

作者信息

Rääsk Triin, Mäestu Jarek, Lätt Evelin, Jürimäe Jaak, Jürimäe Toivo, Vainik Uku, Konstabel Kenn

机构信息

Institute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169527. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Self-report measures of physical activity (PA) are easy to use and popular but their reliability is often questioned. Therefore, the general aim of the present study was to investigate the association of PA questionnaires with accelerometer derived PA, in a sample of adolescent boys. In total, 191 pubertal boys (mean age 14.0 years) completed three self-report questionnaires and wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M) for 7 consecutive days. The PA questionnaires were: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), Tartu Physical Activity Questionnaire (TPAQ), and the Inactivity subscale from Domain-Specific Impulsivity (DSI) scale. All three questionnaires were significantly correlated with accelerometer derived MVPA: the correlations were 0.31 for the IPAQ-SF MVPA, 0.34 for the TPAQ MVPA and -0.29 for the DSI Inactivity scale. Nevertheless, none of the questionnaires can be used as a reliable individual-level estimate of MVPA in male adolescents. The boys underreported their MVPA in IPAQ-SF as compared to accelerometer-derived MVPA (respective averages 43 and 56 minutes); underreporting was more marked in active boys with average daily MVPA at least 60 minutes, and was not significant in less active boys. Conversely, MVPA index from TPAQ overestimated the MVPA in less active boys but underestimated it in more active boys. The sedentary time reported in IPAQ-SF was an underestimate as compared to accelerometer-derived sedentary time (averages 519 and 545 minutes, respectively).

摘要

身体活动(PA)的自我报告测量方法使用简便且广受欢迎,但人们常常质疑其可靠性。因此,本研究的总体目标是在一群青少年男性样本中,调查PA问卷与通过加速度计得出的PA之间的关联。共有191名青春期男孩(平均年龄14.0岁)完成了三份自我报告问卷,并连续7天佩戴加速度计(ActiGraph GT1M)。这些PA问卷分别是:国际身体活动问卷简表(IPAQ-SF)、塔尔图身体活动问卷(TPAQ)以及特定领域冲动性(DSI)量表中的不活动分量表。所有这三份问卷与通过加速度计得出的中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)均显著相关:IPAQ-SF的MVPA相关性为0.31,TPAQ的MVPA相关性为0.34,DSI不活动量表的相关性为-0.29。然而,没有一份问卷能够可靠地用于个体层面评估男性青少年的MVPA。与通过加速度计得出的MVPA相比,男孩们在IPAQ-SF中少报了他们的MVPA(各自平均值分别为43分钟和56分钟);在平均每日MVPA至少60分钟的活跃男孩中,少报情况更为明显,而在不太活跃的男孩中则不显著。相反,TPAQ的MVPA指数在不太活跃的男孩中高估了MVPA,但在更活跃的男孩中则低估了MVPA。与通过加速度计得出的久坐时间相比,IPAQ-SF中报告的久坐时间被低估了(分别为519分钟和545分钟)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1f/5215940/4da956cd3d2f/pone.0169527.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验