• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国难治性反流病的估计:经济负担和相关临床特征。

Estimate of Refractory Reflux Disease in the United States: Economic Burden and Associated Clinical Characteristics.

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN.

Ironwood Pharmaceuticals.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(10):842-850. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001518.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001518
PMID:33780218
Abstract

GOALS

To update the estimate of the prevalence of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the United States, and to assess the clinical and economic differences between patients with and without refractory GERD.

BACKGROUND

GERD affects 18% to 28% of the US population, with nearly 40% of GERD patients presenting with refractory symptoms despite ongoing therapy.

STUDY

Retrospective analysis of the IBM MarketScan databases between January 2011 and June 2018. Inclusion criteria were prescription fill and subsequent refill of a proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist (earliest claim=index date), diagnosis of GERD 60 days preceding and/or following index, continuous insurance enrolment for 12 months preceding/following index, and absence of prior GERD diagnosis or GERD medication. We derived refractory GERD symptom scores for all patients on the basis of a previously published algorithm. Health care costs and comorbidities were assessed for all patients and compared between those with and without refractory GERD.

RESULTS

In total, 399,017 GERD patients qualified for the study; 103,654 (26%) met our definition of having indications of refractory GERD symptoms. Patients with refractory GERD symptoms reported significantly higher rates of hiatal hernia (25.1% vs. 5.9%), esophagitis (37.3% vs. 11.8%), esophageal stricture (11.3% vs. 1.5%), and dysphagia (26.8% vs. 7.1%; P<0.01 for each). The refractory GERD symptoms cohort incurred ~$10,000 greater health care costs per patient per year compared with patients without refractory GERD symptoms ($26,057±$58,948 vs. $15,285±$39,307; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Refractory GERD symptoms were associated with a substantial increase in health care costs. Treatments aimed at improving refractory GERD symptoms may mitigate symptom burden, potentially reducing health care expenditure.

摘要

目的

更新美国难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)患病率的估计,并评估有和无难治性 GERD 患者的临床和经济差异。

背景

GERD 影响美国 18%至 28%的人口,近 40%的 GERD 患者尽管持续治疗,但仍出现难治性症状。

研究

对 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月间 IBM MarketScan 数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为质子泵抑制剂或 H2 受体拮抗剂的处方填写和随后的续方(最早的索赔=索引日期),在索引日期前 60 天和/或之后诊断 GERD,索引日期前/后 12 个月连续投保,以及无先前 GERD 诊断或 GERD 药物治疗。我们根据先前发表的算法为所有患者推导难治性 GERD 症状评分。评估了所有患者的医疗保健费用和合并症,并比较了有和无难治性 GERD 的患者之间的差异。

结果

共有 399,017 名 GERD 患者符合研究条件;103,654 名(26%)符合难治性 GERD 症状的定义。有难治性 GERD 症状的患者报告疝(25.1%比 5.9%)、食管炎(37.3%比 11.8%)、食管狭窄(11.3%比 1.5%)和吞咽困难(26.8%比 7.1%;每项 P<0.01)的发生率显著更高。难治性 GERD 症状组的每位患者每年的医疗保健费用比无难治性 GERD 症状组高出约 10,000 美元(26,057±58,948 美元比 15,285±39,307 美元;P<0.01)。

结论

难治性 GERD 症状与医疗保健费用的大幅增加相关。旨在改善难治性 GERD 症状的治疗方法可能减轻症状负担,从而降低医疗保健支出。

相似文献

1
Estimate of Refractory Reflux Disease in the United States: Economic Burden and Associated Clinical Characteristics.美国难治性反流病的估计:经济负担和相关临床特征。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(10):842-850. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001518.
2
Algorithmic approach to patients presenting with heartburn and epigastric pain refractory to empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.对经验性质子泵抑制剂治疗无效的烧心和上腹痛患者的算法处理方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Oct;56(10):2871-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1708-9. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
3
Characteristics of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms -is switching proton pump inhibitors based on the patient's CYP2C19 genotype an effective management strategy?难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的特征——基于患者细胞色素P450 2C19(CYP2C19)基因型更换质子泵抑制剂是否为一种有效的管理策略?
Intern Med. 2015;54(2):97-105. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.3412. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
4
Multimodality evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms who have failed empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.胃食管反流病症状患者经经验性质子泵抑制剂治疗失败后的多模态评估。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01381.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease.ESNM/ANMS 共识文件:难治性胃食管反流病的诊断和治疗。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Apr;33(4):e14075. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14075. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Cost and burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease among patients with persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: an observational study in France.质子泵抑制剂治疗后症状持续的胃食管反流病患者的成本和负担:法国的一项观察性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb 28;13:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-39.
7
Development of a refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux score using an administrative claims database.利用行政索赔数据库开发难治性胃食管反流评分。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Sep;34(5):555-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04755.x. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
8
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?经喉镜检查怀疑的咽反流病例中有多少与胃食管反流病有关?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
9
New treatment method for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): C-BLART (clip band ligation anti-reflux therapy)-a short-term study.难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的新治疗方法:C-BLART(夹结扎反流治疗)-短期研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4516-4524. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07238-3. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom severity, proton pump inhibitor use, and esophageal carcinogenesis.胃食管反流病症状严重程度、质子泵抑制剂的使用与食管癌发生
Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):851-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.174.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Burden of Partial Response to Standard Doses of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Real-World Evidence Study in India.临床诊断为胃食管反流病患者对标准剂量质子泵抑制剂部分反应的负担评估:印度的一项真实世界证据研究
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s40801-025-00497-8.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden.胃食管反流病患者的诊断和治疗——成本效益和经济负担的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8.
3
A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.
难治性胃食管反流病的科学计量学分析与可视化
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1393526. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393526. eCollection 2024.
4
To wean or not to wean: proton pump inhibitor management after anti-reflux surgery amongst foregut experts.是否停药:胃食管反流手术治疗后质子泵抑制剂管理的专家意见
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3992-3998. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10910-y. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Mixed Esophageal Disease (MED): A New Concept.混合性食管疾病(MED):新概念。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3542-3554. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08008-x. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Causal association between obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与胃食管反流病之间的因果关联:一项双向双样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Genet. 2023 Apr 5;14:1111144. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1111144. eCollection 2023.
7
Influence of proton pump inhibitor use on clinical outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.质子泵抑制剂使用对炎症性肠病患者临床结局的影响。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2198775. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2198775.
8
Utilization of Antireflux Mucosectomy and Resection and Plication: A Novel Approach for the Management of Recurrent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Prior Nissen Fundoplication or Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication.抗反流黏膜切除术、切除术及折叠术的应用:一种治疗既往行nissen胃底折叠术或经口无切口胃底折叠术后复发性胃食管反流病的新方法。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 1;11(23):7141. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237141.
9
Identification of 14 novel susceptibility loci for diaphragmatic hernia development and their biological and clinical implications: results from the UK Biobank.鉴定 14 个新的膈疝发育易感性位点及其生物学和临床意义:来自英国生物银行的研究结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7647-7651. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09064-6. Epub 2022 Sep 8.