• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与胸骨切开术治疗老年二尖瓣手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy for Mitral Surgery in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

622170384 Western University, London, ON, Canada.

1857 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2021 Jul-Aug;16(4):310-316. doi: 10.1177/15569845211000332. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1177/15569845211000332
PMID:33781118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8414825/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in elderly patients is still debated. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing MIMVS with conventional sternotomy (CS) in elderly patients (≥65 years old).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for trials and observational studies comparing MIMVS with CS in patients ≥65 years old presenting for mitral valve surgery. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of all outcomes.

RESULTS

The MIMVS group had lower odds of acute renal failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78), prolonged intubation (>48 h; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.70), less blood product transfusion (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.82 units; 95% CI -1.29 to -0.34 units), shorter ICU length of stay (LOS; WMD -2.57 days; 95% CI -3.24 to -1.90 days) and hospital LOS (WMD -4.06 days; 95% CI -5.19 to -2.94 days). There were no significant differences in the odds of mortality, stroke, respiratory infection, reoperation for bleeding, and postoperative atrial fibrillation. MIMVS was associated with longer cross-clamp (WMD 11.8 min; 95% CI 3.5 to 20.1 min) and cardiopulmonary bypass times (WMD 23.0 min; 95% CI 10.4 to 35.6 min).

CONCLUSIONS

MIMVS in elderly patients is associated with lower postoperative complications, blood transfusion, shorter ICU, and hospital LOS, and longer cross-clamp and bypass times.

摘要

目的

微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)在老年患者中的安全性仍存在争议。我们的目的是对比较 MIMVS 与传统胸骨切开术(CS)在老年患者(≥65 岁)中的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心,以查找比较≥65 岁行二尖瓣手术的患者中 MIMVS 与 CS 的试验和观察性研究。我们对所有结局进行了随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

MIMVS 组急性肾衰竭的几率较低(比值比[OR] 0.27;95%置信区间[CI] 0.10 至 0.78),需要长时间插管(>48 小时;OR 0.47;95% CI 0.31 至 0.70)、较少的血液制品输注(加权均数差[WMD] -0.82 单位;95% CI -1.29 至 -0.34 单位)、较短的 ICU 住院时间(WMD -2.57 天;95% CI -3.24 至 -1.90 天)和住院时间(WMD -4.06 天;95% CI -5.19 至 -2.94 天)。死亡率、中风、呼吸道感染、因出血再次手术和术后心房颤动的几率没有显著差异。MIMVS 与更长的体外循环(WMD 11.8 分钟;95% CI 3.5 至 20.1 分钟)和心肺转流时间(WMD 23.0 分钟;95% CI 10.4 至 35.6 分钟)相关。

结论

MIMVS 治疗老年患者与术后并发症减少、输血减少、ICU 和住院时间缩短、体外循环和心肺转流时间延长有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/b9a240102951/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/7549aba0f46d/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/a16c0230b3f7/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/31e0e328c04e/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/ebb399182b65/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/b9a240102951/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/7549aba0f46d/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/a16c0230b3f7/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/31e0e328c04e/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/ebb399182b65/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d9/8414825/b9a240102951/10.1177_15569845211000332-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy for Mitral Surgery in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创与胸骨切开术治疗老年二尖瓣手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Innovations (Phila). 2021 Jul-Aug;16(4):310-316. doi: 10.1177/15569845211000332. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
A review and meta-analysis of conventional sternotomy versus minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral valve disease focused on the last decade of evidence.一项关于传统胸骨切开术与微创二尖瓣手术治疗退行性二尖瓣疾病的回顾性分析和荟萃分析,重点关注过去十年的证据。
Perfusion. 2024 Jul;39(5):988-997. doi: 10.1177/02676591231174579. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?在二尖瓣手术患者中,全胸骨切开术比体外循环时间的影响更显著吗?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Apr 14;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0719-4.
4
Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies.微创小切口与胸骨正中切口在二尖瓣手术中的比较:近期匹配和随机研究的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 6;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02229-x.
5
Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创开胸术与传统胸骨切开术二尖瓣手术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Jun;58(3):489-496. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09603-8. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
6
Mitral Valve Surgery in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Safe?肺动脉高压患者的二尖瓣手术:微创手术安全吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.147. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
The role of minimal access valve surgery in the elderly. A meta-analysis of observational studies.微创瓣膜手术在老年人中的作用。一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.040. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
Mitral valve repair with minimally invasive approaches vs sternotomy: A meta-analysis of early and late results in randomized and matched observational studies.二尖瓣修复的微创方法与胸骨切开术:随机和匹配观察性研究的早期和晚期结果的荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2020 Sep;35(9):2307-2323. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14799. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Minimally Invasive Procedure versus Conventional Redo Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients with Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.既往心脏手术患者二尖瓣手术的微创与传统再次胸骨切开术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Chest Surg. 2023 Nov 5;56(6):374-386. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.038. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies.微创二尖瓣手术与传统胸骨切开术二尖瓣手术的比较:119 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 May;37(5):1319-1327. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16314. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: An Expanding Standard of Care.≥75岁患者的微创二尖瓣手术:不断扩大的治疗标准
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 16;14(16):5798. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165798.
2
Cost Analysis for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Single-Centre Canadian Study.微创二尖瓣手术的成本分析:一项加拿大单中心研究
CJC Open. 2025 May 2;7(7):871-878. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.072. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Does Body Mass Index Impact Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Mitral Valve Replacement with a Right Chest Small Incision in Patients Aged Over 65 Years.65岁以上患者经右胸小切口的微创视频辅助二尖瓣置换术
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug 27;34(4):428-435. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0409.
2
A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgery.机器人辅助、微创和传统二尖瓣手术的倾向性匹配分析。
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(23):1970-1975. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313129. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with excellent resource utilization, cost, and outcomes.
体重指数对接受微创二尖瓣手术患者的预后有影响吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 16;61(5):903. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050903.
4
Moving from minimally invasive to totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery: a retrospective review of outcomes.从微创二尖瓣手术到完全内镜二尖瓣手术:手术结果的回顾性分析
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 May 6;40(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf106.
5
Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.微创心脏手术中的疼痛管理:当前临床证据综述
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun;14(3):913-930. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00739-1. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Versus Sternotomy Surgical Resection of Primary Cardiac Tumors.微创内镜手术与胸骨切开术切除原发性心脏肿瘤的长期疗效
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):550-555. doi: 10.1177/15569845241289132. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
7
Early outcome of endoscopic mitral valve surgery in elderly patients: a high-volume single center experience.老年患者内镜二尖瓣手术的早期结果:高容量单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 28;10:1182752. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1182752. eCollection 2023.
8
Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.微创心脏手术的麻醉
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Nov 15;10(11):462. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110462.
9
An international survey-based assessment of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.一项基于国际调查的微创二尖瓣手术评估。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;37(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad154.
10
Building a successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair program before introducing the robotic approach: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience.在引入机器人手术方法之前建立一个成功的微创二尖瓣修复项目:麻省总医院的经验。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 21;10:1113908. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1113908. eCollection 2023.
微创二尖瓣手术与优秀的资源利用、成本和结果相关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;156(2):611-616.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.108. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Higher-risk mitral valve operations after previous sternotomy: endoscopic, minimally invasive approach improves patient outcomes.既往胸骨切开术后的高风险二尖瓣手术:内镜下微创方法可改善患者预后。
Can J Surg. 2016 Dec;59(6):399-406. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004516.
5
Minimally invasive mitral repair surgery: why does controversy still persist?微创二尖瓣修复手术:为何争议依然存在?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jan;15(1):15-24. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1266936. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
6
Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison.微创方法为二尖瓣反流的手术矫正提供了至少等效的结果:一项倾向匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3):748-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.093.
7
Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients.微创与传统胸骨切开术二尖瓣手术治疗老年患者的比较效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.090.
8
Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery.肥胖患者行单纯瓣膜手术中微创瓣膜手术与标准胸骨切开术的结果比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;91(2):406-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.039.
9
Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients greater than 70 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.高龄患者行二尖瓣手术时微创与胸骨正中切开术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;91(2):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.08.006.
10
Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater.75 岁及以上患者微创瓣膜手术与正中开胸术的结果比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Jan;91(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.019.