Mignini F, Prenna M, Oliveri S, Cammarata E, Falcioni E, Dainelli B, Ripa S
Department of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Italy.
Chemioterapia. 1988 Feb;7(1):38-41.
This study evaluates the susceptibility of sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and Candida lusitaniae strains to amphotericin B (AMB), miconazole (MCZ) and ketoconazole (KTZ). The susceptibility tests were carried out in different media: Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM-3m) and Earle Minimum Essential Medium (E-MEM) for AMB: Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and E-MEM for imidazole compounds. The minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of AMB were slightly higher than minimal inhibitory concentration (MICs) except against Candida lusitaniae strains; whereas the MFCs of MCZ and KTZ were higher than the MICs by almost two-fold for all strains tested. AMB was more efficacious against sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and the MICs were very definite; on the contrary, the MICs with KTZ were difficult to read. The MICs of AMB in E-MEM were essentially the same as those in AM-3m; whereas for KTZ and MCZ determined in YNB the MICs were generally higher than those obtained in E-MEM.
本研究评估了蔗糖阴性热带假丝酵母菌和葡萄牙假丝酵母菌菌株对两性霉素B(AMB)、咪康唑(MCZ)和酮康唑(KTZ)的敏感性。敏感性试验在不同培养基中进行:用于AMB的抗生素培养基3(AM - 3m)和Earle最低必需培养基(E - MEM);用于咪唑类化合物的酵母氮源培养基(YNB)和E - MEM。除葡萄牙假丝酵母菌菌株外,AMB的最低杀菌浓度(MFC)略高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC);而对于所有测试菌株,MCZ和KTZ的MFC比MIC高近两倍。AMB对蔗糖阴性热带假丝酵母菌更有效,且MIC非常明确;相反,KTZ的MIC难以读取。E - MEM中AMB的MIC与AM - 3m中的基本相同;而在YNB中测定的KTZ和MCZ的MIC通常高于在E - MEM中获得的MIC。