Suppr超能文献

催眠和渐进性肌肉放松在 8-12 岁儿童拔牙术中的焦虑和疼痛控制的随机对照试验。

Hypnosis and progressive muscle relaxation for anxiolysis and pain control during extraction procedure in 8-12-year-old children: a randomized control trial.

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110095, Delhi, India.

Department of Psychiatry, University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110095, Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021 Oct;22(5):823-832. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00619-0. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypnosis (H) and Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) have proven to be effective in a variety of medical settings; there is a paucity of their practical application in paediatric dentistry. The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the role of H and PMR on anxiety, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SPO), blood pressure (BP), pain, and analgesic requirement during extraction in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty children aged 8-12 years undergoing primary molar extractions were randomly allocated to three groups-H, PMR, and control (C). The anxiety (proposed Visual Facial Anxiety scale), HR, and SPO were measured pre/post-operatively with/without interventions (H, PMR, C) at 4 intervals. The BP and pain (Wong-Baker faces pain scale) were recorded pre- and post-operatively. Need for analgesic post-operatively was assessed.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reduction in anxiety was noted post-extraction in H (0.30 ± 0.80), PMR (0.50 ± 0.69) (p < 0.001*). HR showed a statistically significant drop after H, PMR application. (p < 0.001*) No significant difference in SPO was noted in the three groups (p > 0.05). Pain control was well achieved using H (85%), PMR (70%); BP was well-regulated in the H, PMR compared to C group (p < 0.001*). Need for analgesics was reduced in H (45%), PMR (50%) versus C (100%). Both techniques H, PMR were comparable in all measures.

CONCLUSION

Hypnosis and PMR are effective techniques for anxiolysis and pain control in paediatric dental patients.

摘要

简介

催眠(H)和渐进性肌肉放松(PMR)已被证明在多种医疗环境中有效;但在儿科牙科中,它们的实际应用却很少。本研究旨在比较评估 H 和 PMR 在儿童拔牙过程中对焦虑、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SPO)、血压(BP)、疼痛和镇痛需求的作用。

材料和方法

将 60 名 8-12 岁接受乳磨牙拔除的儿童随机分为三组:H 组、PMR 组和对照组(C)。在干预(H、PMR、C)前后,用/不用干预措施,在 4 个时间点测量术前/术后的焦虑(提出的视觉面部焦虑量表)、HR 和 SPO。记录术前/术后的 BP 和疼痛(Wong-Baker 面部疼痛量表)。术后评估镇痛需求。

结果

H 组(0.30±0.80)和 PMR 组(0.50±0.69)拔牙后焦虑显著降低(p<0.001*)。H、PMR 应用后 HR 明显下降。(p<0.001*)三组 SPO 无显著差异(p>0.05)。H 组(85%)和 PMR 组(70%)镇痛效果较好;H、PMR 组 BP 调节优于 C 组(p<0.001*)。与 C 组(100%)相比,H 组(45%)和 PMR 组(50%)需要的镇痛药减少。H 和 PMR 在所有指标上都相当。

结论

催眠和 PMR 是儿科牙科患者焦虑和疼痛控制的有效技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4770/8006876/1c6ce72ee432/40368_2021_619_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验