Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Penn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3373-3382. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06678-9. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
The opioid epidemic is widely recognized as a legislative priority, but there is substantial variation in state adoption of evidence-based policy. State legislators' use of social media to disseminate information and to indicate support for specific initiatives continues to grow and may reflect legislators' openness to opioid-related policy change.
We sought to identify changes in the national dialogue regarding the opioid epidemic among Democratic and Republican state legislators and to estimate changing partisanship around understanding and addressing the epidemic over time.
Longitudinal natural language processing analysis.
A total of 4083 US state legislators in office between 2014 and 2019 with any opioid-related social media posts.
Association between opioid-related post volume and state overdose mortality, as measured by Kendall's rank correlation coefficient. Latent Dirichlet allocation analysis of all social media posts to identify key opioid-related topics. Longitudinal analysis of differences in the prevalence of key topics among Democrats and Republicans over time.
In total, 43,558 social media posts met inclusion criteria, with the vast majority to Twitter (n=28,564; 65.6%) or Facebook (n=14,283; 32.8%). Posts were more likely to mention fentanyl and less likely to mention heroin over time. The volume of opioid-related content was positively associated with state-level unintentional overdose mortality among both Democrats (tau=0.42, P<.001) and Republicans (tau=0.39, P<.001). Democrats' social media content has increasingly spoken to holding pharmaceutical companies accountable, while Republicans' social media content has increasingly spoken to curbing illicit drug trade. Overall, partisanship across topics increased from 2016 to 2019.
The volume of opioid-related social media posts by US state legislators between 2014 and 2019 is associated with state-level overdose mortality, but the content across parties is significantly different. Democrats' and Republicans' social media posts may reflect growing partisanship regarding how best to address the overdose epidemic.
阿片类药物泛滥已被广泛认为是立法的当务之急,但各州在采用循证政策方面存在很大差异。州议员利用社交媒体传播信息并表示支持特定倡议的情况继续增加,这可能反映了议员们对阿片类药物相关政策变革的开放态度。
我们旨在确定民主党和共和党州议员在阿片类药物泛滥问题上的全国性对话的变化,并估计随着时间的推移,他们对理解和应对这一流行疾病的党派立场的变化。
纵向自然语言处理分析。
2014 年至 2019 年期间在职的共 4083 名美国州议员,他们有任何与阿片类药物相关的社交媒体帖子。
用 Kendall 等级相关系数衡量阿片类药物相关帖子数量与州级过量死亡率之间的关联。对所有社交媒体帖子进行潜在狄利克雷分配分析,以确定关键的阿片类药物相关主题。随着时间的推移,对民主党人和共和党人之间关键主题流行率的差异进行纵向分析。
共有 43558 条社交媒体帖子符合纳入标准,其中绝大多数(n=28564;65.6%)是在 Twitter 上发布的,14283 条(32.8%)是在 Facebook 上发布的。随着时间的推移,帖子中提到芬太尼的频率越来越高,而提到海洛因的频率越来越低。民主党人和共和党人,无论是民主党人(tau=0.42,P<.001)还是共和党人(tau=0.39,P<.001),阿片类药物相关内容的数量与州级非故意过量死亡率呈正相关。民主党人的社交媒体内容越来越多地呼吁追究制药公司的责任,而共和党人的社交媒体内容越来越多地呼吁遏制非法毒品贸易。总体而言,从 2016 年到 2019 年,各党派之间的主题分歧越来越大。
2014 年至 2019 年期间,美国州议员与阿片类药物相关的社交媒体帖子数量与州级过量死亡率相关,但各方的内容却大不相同。民主党人和共和党人的社交媒体帖子可能反映了他们在如何最好地应对过量流行方面日益加剧的党派分歧。