Suppr超能文献

政策参与的科学传播优化器:SCOPE 模型对州议员在公共话语中使用研究的随机对照试验。

SciComm Optimizer for Policy Engagement: a randomized controlled trial of the SCOPE model on state legislators' research use in public discourse.

机构信息

Evidence-to-Impact Collaborative, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.

Social Work Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2023 May 5;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01268-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While prior work has revealed conditions that foster policymakers' use of research evidence, few studies have rigorously investigated the effectiveness of theory-based practices. Specifically, policymakers are most apt to use research evidence when it is timely, relevant, brief, and messaged appropriately, as well as when it facilitates interactive engagement. This study sought to experimentally evaluate an enhanced research dissemination intervention, known as the SciComm Optimizer for Policy Engagement (SCOPE), implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic among US state legislators.

METHODS

State legislators assigned to health committees and their staff were randomized to receive the SCOPE intervention. This involved providing academic researchers with a pathway for translating and disseminating research relevant to current legislative priorities via fact sheets emailed directly to officials. The intervention occurred April 2020-March 2021. Research language was measured in state legislators' social media posts.

RESULTS

Legislators randomized to receive the intervention, relative to the control group, produced 24% more social media posts containing research language related to COVID-19. Secondary analyses revealed that these findings were driven by two different types of research language. Intervention officials produced 67% more COVID-related social media posts referencing technical language (e.g., statistical methods), as well as 28% more posts that referenced research-based concepts. However, they produced 31% fewer posts that referenced creating or disseminating new knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that strategic, targeted science communication efforts may have the potential to change state legislators' public discourse and use of evidence. Strategic science communication efforts are particularly needed in light of the role government officials have played in communicating about the pandemic to the general public.

摘要

背景

尽管先前的研究揭示了一些有利于政策制定者使用研究证据的条件,但很少有研究严格调查基于理论的实践的有效性。具体而言,当研究证据及时、相关、简洁且信息传达方式恰当,并且有助于互动参与时,政策制定者最有可能使用研究证据。本研究旨在实验评估一种增强型研究传播干预措施,称为政策参与的科学传播优化器(SCOPE),该措施在 COVID-19 大流行期间在美国州议员中实施。

方法

被分配到健康委员会的州议员及其工作人员被随机分配接受 SCOPE 干预。这涉及为学术研究人员提供一条途径,通过直接向官员发送电子邮件的情况说明书来传播与当前立法优先事项相关的研究。干预发生在 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间。研究语言是通过州议员的社交媒体帖子来衡量的。

结果

与对照组相比,随机接受干预的议员在与 COVID-19 相关的研究语言的社交媒体帖子中增加了 24%。二次分析表明,这些发现是由两种不同类型的研究语言驱动的。干预官员发布了 67%更多的与 COVID 相关的社交媒体帖子,引用了技术语言(例如,统计方法),以及 28%更多的引用了基于研究的概念的帖子。然而,他们发布的提及创建或传播新知识的帖子减少了 31%。

结论

本研究表明,战略性、有针对性的科学传播工作可能有潜力改变州议员的公开言论和证据使用。鉴于政府官员在向公众传播有关大流行的信息方面所扮演的角色,因此特别需要战略性的科学传播工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d243/10161680/9c5a212a9c16/13012_2023_1268_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验