Geneen Louise J, Kinsella Jodie, Zanotto Tobia, Naish Patrick F, Mercer Thomas H
Centre of Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Health Sciences, 3122Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Renal Medicine, 105646University of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Perit Dial Int. 2022 Jan;42(1):57-64. doi: 10.1177/08968608211002384. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Accurate measurement of muscle mass is an important research and clinical tool. High-resolution ultrasound (US) has shown potential as a method to assess muscle and fat mass at specific anatomical sites. However, there is limited evidence for the reliability of US to measure muscle size in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Therefore, we examined the validity and reliability of an US method compared to a gold standard comparison for the assessment of a quadriceps muscle in this clinical population.
Twenty people receiving CAPD (mean age = 56.5 ± 16.7 years) at a single dialysis unit were assessed on two occasions, 7 days apart. Measures of the mid-thigh, such as vastus lateralis (VL) anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA), VL muscle thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness were compared for US reliability and validity compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures.
US had high validity against gold standard MRI measures, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) equating to VL ACSA of 0.95, VL thickness of 0.99 and fat thickness of 0.98. The US measurements also exhibited high intra-rater reliability (ICCs: VL thickness = 0.98, total muscle thickness = 0.97 and fat thickness = 0.99) in measuring body composition at the mid-VL site in the study population.
Valid assessment of regional body composition can be achieved via high-resolution US in patients receiving CAPD. The validity and reliability of the US in repeated measures (in comparison to the gold standard MRI) warrant further investigation in the wider chronic kidney disease population.
准确测量肌肉质量是一项重要的研究和临床工具。高分辨率超声(US)已显示出作为评估特定解剖部位肌肉和脂肪质量方法的潜力。然而,关于US测量持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者肌肉大小的可靠性的证据有限。因此,我们在这一临床人群中,将一种US方法与金标准比较,以检验其评估股四头肌的有效性和可靠性。
在一个透析单元中,对20名接受CAPD的患者(平均年龄=56.5±16.7岁)进行了两次评估,间隔7天。将大腿中部的测量值,如股外侧肌(VL)的解剖横截面积(ACSA)、VL肌肉厚度和皮下脂肪厚度,与磁共振成像(MRI)测量值进行比较,以评估US的可靠性和有效性。
与金标准MRI测量相比,US具有较高的有效性,组内相关系数(ICC)分别为:VL ACSA为0.95,VL厚度为0.99,脂肪厚度为0.98。在研究人群中,US测量在测量VL中部部位的身体成分时,也表现出较高的评估者内可靠性(ICC:VL厚度=0.98,总肌肉厚度=0.97,脂肪厚度=0.99)。
接受CAPD的患者可通过高分辨率US实现对局部身体成分的有效评估。US在重复测量中的有效性和可靠性(与金标准MRI相比)值得在更广泛的慢性肾病患者群体中进一步研究。