• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语连贯性的手动与自动定量产出分析比较。

A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Apr 14;64(4):1271-1282. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00561. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00561
PMID:33784197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608208/
Abstract

Purpose Analysis of connected speech in the field of adult neurogenic communication disorders is essential for research and clinical purposes, yet time and expertise are often cited as limiting factors. The purpose of this project was to create and evaluate an automated program to score and compute the measures from the Quantitative Production Analysis (QPA), an objective and systematic approach for measuring morphological and structural features of connected speech. Method The QPA was used to analyze transcripts of Cinderella stories from 109 individuals with acute-subacute left hemisphere stroke. Regression slopes and residuals were used to compare the results of manual scoring and automated scoring using the newly developed C-QPA command in CLAN, a set of programs for automatic analysis of language samples. Results The C-QPA command produced two spreadsheet outputs: an analysis spreadsheet with scores for each utterance in the language sample, and a summary spreadsheet with 18 score totals from the analysis spreadsheet and an additional 15 measures derived from those totals. Linear regression analysis revealed that 32 of the 33 measures had good agreement; was the one score that did not have good agreement. Conclusions The C-QPA command can be used to perform automated analyses of language transcripts, saving time and training and providing reliable and valid quantification of connected speech. Transcribing in CHAT, the CLAN editor, also streamlined the process of transcript preparation for QPA and allowed for precise linking of media files to language transcripts for temporal analyses.

摘要

目的

分析成人神经源性语言障碍领域的连续言语对于研究和临床目的至关重要,但时间和专业知识通常被认为是限制因素。本项目的目的是创建和评估一个自动程序,以对定量生产分析(QPA)进行评分并计算其度量值,这是一种客观而系统的方法,用于测量连续言语的形态和结构特征。

方法

使用 QPA 分析了 109 名急性亚急性左侧大脑半球中风患者的灰姑娘故事转录本。使用 CLAN 中的新开发的 C-QPA 命令(一组语言样本自动分析程序),使用回归斜率和残差比较手动评分和自动评分的结果。

结果

C-QPA 命令生成了两个电子表格输出:一个分析电子表格,其中包含语言样本中每个话语的分数,以及一个汇总电子表格,其中包含分析电子表格中的 18 个分数总和以及从这些总和中得出的另外 15 个度量。线性回归分析表明,33 个测量值中有 32 个具有良好的一致性;有一个得分没有良好的一致性。

结论

C-QPA 命令可用于执行语言转录本的自动分析,节省时间和培训,并提供可靠和有效的连续言语量化。在 CLAN 编辑器 CHAT 中进行转录也简化了 QPA 的转录准备过程,并允许将媒体文件与语言转录本精确链接,以便进行时间分析。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.言语连贯性的手动与自动定量产出分析比较。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Apr 14;64(4):1271-1282. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00561. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Automation of the Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis System.西北叙事语言分析系统的自动化
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1835-1844. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00267. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Manual Versus Automated Narrative Analysis of Agrammatic Production Patterns: The Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis and Computerized Language Analysis.语法缺失性产出模式的人工叙事分析与自动叙事分析对比:西北叙事语言分析与计算机化语言分析
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Feb 15;61(2):373-385. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0185.
4
Machine-Scored Syntax: Comparison of the CLAN Automatic Scoring Program to Manual Scoring.机器评分句法:CLAN 自动评分程序与人工评分的比较。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):479-493. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00056. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Differences in Connected Speech Outcomes Across Elicitation Methods.不同引出方法下连贯言语结果的差异。
Aphasiology. 2024;38(5):816-837. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2239509. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
6
Description of connected speech across different elicitation tasks in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.在原发性进行性失语症的失语症变异中,不同引出任务下的连贯言语描述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Sep;56(5):1074-1085. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12660. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
A "Verbal Thermometer" for Assessing Neurodegenerative Disease: Automated Measurement of Pronoun and Verb Ratio from Speech.一种用于评估神经退行性疾病的“言语温度计”:自动测量言语中的代词与动词比率
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:5831-5837. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176185.
8
Auditory-Perceptual Rating of Connected Speech in Aphasia.失语症患者言语连贯性的听觉感知评估。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 May 27;28(2):550-568. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0192. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
A unified model of post-stroke language deficits including discourse production and their neural correlates.一种包括话语生成在内的卒中后语言缺陷的统一模型及其神经相关性。
Brain. 2020 May 1;143(5):1541-1554. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa074.
10
Connected speech in transient aphasias after left hemisphere resective surgery.左半球切除术后短暂性失语中的连贯言语。
Aphasiology. 2017;31(11):1266-1281. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1278740. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Connected Speech Outcomes Across Elicitation Methods.不同引出方法下连贯言语结果的差异。
Aphasiology. 2024;38(5):816-837. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2239509. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
Automation of Language Sample Analysis.语言样本分析自动化。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jul 12;66(7):2421-2433. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00642. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
A systematic review of studies on connected speech processing: Trends, key findings, and implications.关于连贯言语处理研究的系统综述:趋势、主要发现及启示
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:1056827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056827. eCollection 2022.
4
Anterior connectivity critical for recovery of connected speech after stroke.中风后连贯言语恢复的关键在于前向连接。
Brain Commun. 2022 Oct 19;4(6):fcac266. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac266. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing Assessment of Spoken Discourse in Aphasia: A Working Group With Deliverables.标准化失语症口语评估:具有可交付成果的工作组。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;30(1S):491-502. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00093. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Automation of the Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis System.西北叙事语言分析系统的自动化
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1835-1844. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00267. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Dissociation between frontal and temporal-parietal contributions to connected speech in acute stroke.急性脑卒中患者额区与颞顶区在连续言语产出中的分离。
Brain. 2020 Mar 1;143(3):862-876. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa027.
4
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.英国言语治疗师在失语症康复中对话语分析的看法和报告的实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
Mapping articulatory and grammatical subcomponents of fluency deficits in post-stroke aphasia.绘制中风后失语症流利性缺陷的发音和语法子成分
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Oct;19(5):1286-1298. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00729-9.
6
Let's talk real talk: An argument to include conversation in a D-COS for aphasia research with an acknowledgment of the challenges ahead.让我们实话实说:主张将对话纳入失语症研究的数字临床结局量表,并认识到前方的挑战。
Aphasiology. 2018;32(4):475-478. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1398808. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Independent contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to spontaneous speech in acute stroke.语义和语音工作记忆对急性脑卒中患者自发语言的独立贡献。
Cortex. 2019 Mar;112:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement.失语症治疗研究的核心结局集:ROMA 共识声明。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Feb;14(2):180-185. doi: 10.1177/1747493018806200. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Manual Versus Automated Narrative Analysis of Agrammatic Production Patterns: The Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis and Computerized Language Analysis.语法缺失性产出模式的人工叙事分析与自动叙事分析对比:西北叙事语言分析与计算机化语言分析
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Feb 15;61(2):373-385. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0185.
10
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.失语症中话语信息测量质量的综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.